![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
First of all, I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong place. I've been lurking here for a while on CNCzone and trying to soak up as much as possible, but now I need advice. I run/own a small 2 man manufacturing company and now have a somewhat urgent need (within 2-3 months) for a "specialized" machine to accurately slice a round bar stock of crystal into slices or wafers. The thickness of the slices is important. I am trying to keep them within +- 0.0003" of a target thickness. I have attached a basic sketch of what I think the machine is to look like. I have specifically omitted the coolant drainage/collection and splash issues for now. Please look at the .PDF as it makes things clearer (I hope). I envision a basic machine consisting of 2 axis'. An accurate/precision axis to step the bar along to create the slice thickness (8 inches of travel min.) and a far less accurate axis (3 inches of travel min.) to push the crystal bar into a position stationary diamond blade and then retract it when the cut is done. Cutting will be water cooled. The concept is very similar to a tile/brick wet saw where you push the object into the blade. Each axis will be driven by either a stepper or servo and controlled probably by Gecko's and then Mach2 or other comparable software. I am a Mech. Eng. and have a good bit of experience with designing building fixtures, jigs, parts, etc. I have previous experience with the blades/motors/etc and sawing of this material. I have minimal experience with stepper/servo motors and controls. My plan is to try to purchase (new or used, ebay etc) either a complete 2 axis assembly or each axis seperately and join them. To fabricate the bar stock holder and mount it to the uppermost stage. To build the motor/blade mount myself and mount it and the two stages to a rigid base plate. To purchase a preassembled Gecko/controller/PS box. To use as much preassembled stuff as possible to save time and compensate for my lack of experience in this area. I am doing this because machines designed for crystal wafering are typically $20K to $30K used!, and old, and oversized for what I need, etc, etc. Does my plan sound reasonable?? I am expecting to spend $2k to $4K to do this. I would be willing to let someone else construct it for me, if they had the experience and the price was reasonable. Any and all comments/questions are welcome. Thanks for your time, Andy M. (Ga. Tech, BSME '91) |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Welcome to the boards Andy, I don't have much experience building myself but what you have described (and drawn) seems very straight forward to me. Heck, you won't need much in the way of software either. You'll probably want to spec out some ground ballscrew for your X axis if those are the tollerances you wish to hold. The whole blade setup will be just as crucial. What size blade are you going to use? Can you really hold it steady to .0003" while rotating it X rpm? This is the question that jumps out at me most of all. On the other hand, like you said, a lot of this has already been engineered, so I guess it is possible. BTW, are you making silicon chips? I've done research on the silicon industry and the term "ingot" is frequently used... Carlo |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Well your price is probably a bit shy for a machine that must hold tenths. I suspect your therory is A-OK, it sounds like you know what you need. As long as you can determine what the kerf size is on the blade you should be able to attempt to slice your wafers, Are the cutting loads fairly low? You will definetly want to use precision slides and ball screws which will drive up the price. 0.0003 sure is a tight tolerance to hold on a saw type operation, the alignment will be crucial, as will the work piece holding. is parrallel more important than size control? To make things more rigid, you might consider a single axis for moving the work and another for moving the motor with the blade. That would allow a wider base across the motor axis and would be eaiser to get rigid. Both axis could then be fixed to a single plane, ie base. Possibly the use of a say 18 X 24 or 24 X 36 granite surface plate would make an ideal base with lots of mass. In 0.0002 flatness they are quite reasonable. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
Andy, Welcome to the CNCZone. I think that building the machine is possible. However, I am concerned that the tolerance of 0.0003 could possibly be a problem. I think that a servo motor with encoder feedback is required on the X axis. The encoder would be required to get the accuracy that is desired. As was mentioned in the previous posts, a very high tolerance ballscrew or leadscrew with almost zero backlash would be required. You might also want to consider having a brake on the X axis servo motor to hold the position once the correct position is reached. Any movement at all during the cutting stage could really mess up the wafer surface. Any flexing of the cutting blade could also affect the tolerance. I don't think the Y axis is critical, so you could use either a stepper or servo, but personally, I would use the same components on both axis so that spare parts would be minimal, and troubleshooting would be simpler due to using same components. There is a complete wiring diagram for the Gecko 320 servo system on this site that I uploaded awhile back. It includes power supply, Gecko's, servos, encoders, and breakout board. It is listed under the Gecko Thread. I don't have the exact link at this time. You will need a qualified electronics/electrical person to perform the wiring for this system. Good luck on your project, and keep us posted with photos if possible. Jerry |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I disagree with some of the previous postings. A precision acme thread can be as precise or more precise than a ballscrew. Since you are only moving in a single direction, backlash is unimportant. Since traverse speed is low, forces are low. Use steppers for both the X and Y axis. Ken
__________________ Kenneth Lerman 55 Main Street Newtown, CT 06470 |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't see posted here what shape the stock is, but I wonder if a lathe type operation (with a live tool running your diamond blade) would be more successful than a cutoff saw type of thing? For one thing, wheel loading will be much reduced if you rotate the stock. The travel accuracy of the saw would be better if it only has to travel the radius distance to complete the cut. If the cuts are concave, the tool slide could be tweaked to obtain better flatness, or at least, you will be able to determine if the flatness fault is in the blade wandering or in the setup, if you find that no amount of tweaking will give perfect results every cut. With a lathe type cutoff, you can also position the part for cutting several slices without rechucking the stock. This permits you to make proper offsets to allow for the blade thickness (and possible wear amount), between cuts, and permits you to get the maximum accuracy for the next cut by simply indexing the carriage screw. You could use any old screw, but use a precision linear scale to determine the position accuracy. Hold the cutoff part with a suction cup in a live tailcenter.
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| You have this sentence in your first post: "Does my plan sound reasonable?? I am expecting to spend $2k to $4K to do this." You want +/- 0.0003 on a target thickness which requires two cuts separated by one advance of the material. Each cut has to be better than +/- 0.0001 and the advance has to be the same. This is a very tight tolerance; if you look up the specs for many CNC machining centers and lathes you will find the mid range machines quote accuracy of +/- 0.0002 and precision of +/- 0.0001. For $2k to $4k no your plan is not reasonable. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Andy, My first thought was cut the wafers without any regard to tolerance then lap them.I have seen rotary lapping machines used on ebay for the cost you are talking about. You could even build one as i am doing now. Google speefam or rotary lapping table. They can lap to within a half a wave length of a single lightband, which by the way is how the semiconductor industry does it. Also look up lapmaster model 15c for an idea of how they work. One could build the frame,table,slurry dispensing system,etc and buy the conditioning rings,and lap plate. Good luck! |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Well you're an ME...so you probably already know that the main problem is with how accurately your diamond blade is rotating.....so the spindle for the saw is the biggest problem....figure out how much tolerance different spindles can hold....once you know that then you know how much of your budget is in the spindle. You could actually use a stop mechanism....you know where you feed the ingot until you meet the physical stop. I'm sure you get the idea. Last edited by ViperTX; 01-06-2006 at 01:50 PM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |