CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Linear and Rotary Motion


Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-01-2006, 11:09 PM
amasters's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 53
amasters is on a distinguished road
Advice on building a specialized machine...

First of all, I'm sorry if this is posted in the wrong place.

I've been lurking here for a while on CNCzone and trying to soak up as much as possible, but now I need advice.

I run/own a small 2 man manufacturing company and now have a somewhat urgent need (within 2-3 months) for a "specialized" machine to accurately slice a round bar stock of crystal into slices or wafers. The thickness of the slices is important. I am trying to keep them within +- 0.0003" of a target thickness.

I have attached a basic sketch of what I think the machine is to look like. I have specifically omitted the coolant drainage/collection and splash issues for now. Please look at the .PDF as it makes things clearer (I hope).

I envision a basic machine consisting of 2 axis'. An accurate/precision axis to step the bar along to create the slice thickness (8 inches of travel min.) and a far less accurate axis (3 inches of travel min.) to push the crystal bar into a position stationary diamond blade and then retract it when the cut is done. Cutting will be water cooled. The concept is very similar to a tile/brick wet saw where you push the object into the blade.

Each axis will be driven by either a stepper or servo and controlled probably by Gecko's and then Mach2 or other comparable software.

I am a Mech. Eng. and have a good bit of experience with designing building fixtures, jigs, parts, etc. I have previous experience with the blades/motors/etc and sawing of this material. I have minimal experience with stepper/servo motors and controls.

My plan is to try to purchase (new or used, ebay etc) either a complete 2 axis assembly or each axis seperately and join them. To fabricate the bar stock holder and mount it to the uppermost stage. To build the motor/blade mount myself and mount it and the two stages to a rigid base plate. To purchase a preassembled Gecko/controller/PS box. To use as much preassembled stuff as possible to save time and compensate for my lack of experience in this area.

I am doing this because machines designed for crystal wafering are typically $20K to $30K used!, and old, and oversized for what I need, etc, etc.

Does my plan sound reasonable?? I am expecting to spend $2k to $4K to do this.

I would be willing to let someone else construct it for me, if they had the experience and the price was reasonable.

Any and all comments/questions are welcome.

Thanks for your time,

Andy M.
(Ga. Tech, BSME '91)
Attached Files
File Type: pdf Ingot Slicer.pdf‎ (12.4 KB, 234 views)
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 02:25 AM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 290
cbass is on a distinguished road

Welcome to the boards Andy,

I don't have much experience building myself but what you have described (and drawn) seems very straight forward to me. Heck, you won't need much in the way of software either.

You'll probably want to spec out some ground ballscrew for your X axis if those are the tollerances you wish to hold. The whole blade setup will be just as crucial. What size blade are you going to use? Can you really hold it steady to .0003" while rotating it X rpm? This is the question that jumps out at me most of all. On the other hand, like you said, a lot of this has already been engineered, so I guess it is possible.

BTW, are you making silicon chips? I've done research on the silicon industry and the term "ingot" is frequently used...

Carlo
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 03:15 AM
DieGuy's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 420
DieGuy is on a distinguished road

Well your price is probably a bit shy for a machine that must hold tenths. I suspect your therory is A-OK, it sounds like you know what you need. As long as you can determine what the kerf size is on the blade you should be able to attempt to slice your wafers,

Are the cutting loads fairly low? You will definetly want to use precision slides and ball screws which will drive up the price. 0.0003 sure is a tight tolerance to hold on a saw type operation, the alignment will be crucial, as will the work piece holding. is parrallel more important than size control?

To make things more rigid, you might consider a single axis for moving the work and another for moving the motor with the blade. That would allow a wider base across the motor axis and would be eaiser to get rigid. Both axis could then be fixed to a single plane, ie base. Possibly the use of a say 18 X 24 or 24 X 36 granite surface plate would make an ideal base with lots of mass. In 0.0002 flatness they are quite reasonable.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 01-02-2006, 03:28 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 742
CJL5585 is on a distinguished road
Welcome to the Zone -- The CNCZone

Andy,
Welcome to the CNCZone.

I think that building the machine is possible. However, I am concerned that the tolerance of 0.0003 could possibly be a problem.

I think that a servo motor with encoder feedback is required on the X axis. The encoder would be required to get the accuracy that is desired.

As was mentioned in the previous posts, a very high tolerance ballscrew or leadscrew with almost zero backlash would be required.

You might also want to consider having a brake on the X axis servo motor to hold the position once the correct position is reached. Any movement at all during the cutting stage could really mess up the wafer surface.

Any flexing of the cutting blade could also affect the tolerance.

I don't think the Y axis is critical, so you could use either a stepper or servo, but personally, I would use the same components on both axis so that spare parts would be minimal, and troubleshooting would be simpler due to using same components.

There is a complete wiring diagram for the Gecko 320 servo system on this site that I uploaded awhile back. It includes power supply, Gecko's, servos, encoders, and breakout board. It is listed under the Gecko Thread. I don't have the exact link at this time.

You will need a qualified electronics/electrical person to perform the wiring for this system.

Good luck on your project, and keep us posted with photos if possible.

Jerry
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 09:04 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: U.S.ofA.
Posts: 91
Bear is on a distinguished road

Hey Andy
check out "Low Cost CNC Retrofits" for ready to go units,sounds like what
youre hunting,Im satisifed pretty much ith the results I got.
Bear
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:13 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newtown, CT, USA
Age: 68
Posts: 517
lerman is on a distinguished road

I disagree with some of the previous postings. A precision acme thread can be as precise or more precise than a ballscrew. Since you are only moving in a single direction, backlash is unimportant. Since traverse speed is low, forces are low. Use steppers for both the X and Y axis.

Ken
__________________
Kenneth Lerman
55 Main Street
Newtown, CT 06470
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 01-02-2006, 09:56 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

I don't see posted here what shape the stock is, but I wonder if a lathe type operation (with a live tool running your diamond blade) would be more successful than a cutoff saw type of thing?

For one thing, wheel loading will be much reduced if you rotate the stock.

The travel accuracy of the saw would be better if it only has to travel the radius distance to complete the cut. If the cuts are concave, the tool slide could be tweaked to obtain better flatness, or at least, you will be able to determine if the flatness fault is in the blade wandering or in the setup, if you find that no amount of tweaking will give perfect results every cut.

With a lathe type cutoff, you can also position the part for cutting several slices without rechucking the stock. This permits you to make proper offsets to allow for the blade thickness (and possible wear amount), between cuts, and permits you to get the maximum accuracy for the next cut by simply indexing the carriage screw. You could use any old screw, but use a precision linear scale to determine the position accuracy.

Hold the cutoff part with a suction cup in a live tailcenter.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 10:30 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

You have this sentence in your first post:

"Does my plan sound reasonable?? I am expecting to spend $2k to $4K to do this."

You want +/- 0.0003 on a target thickness which requires two cuts separated by one advance of the material. Each cut has to be better than +/- 0.0001 and the advance has to be the same. This is a very tight tolerance; if you look up the specs for many CNC machining centers and lathes you will find the mid range machines quote accuracy of +/- 0.0002 and precision of +/- 0.0001.

For $2k to $4k no your plan is not reasonable.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 12:29 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Age: 52
Posts: 169
swarfmacdaddy is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

Andy,
My first thought was cut the wafers without any regard to tolerance then lap them.I have seen rotary lapping machines used on ebay for the cost you are talking about. You could even build one as i am doing now. Google speefam or rotary lapping table. They can lap to within a half a wave length of a single lightband, which by the way is how the semiconductor industry does it. Also look up lapmaster model 15c for an idea of how they work. One could build the frame,table,slurry dispensing system,etc and buy the conditioning rings,and lap plate. Good luck!
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 08:52 PM
DennisCNC's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL US
Age: 29
Posts: 816
DennisCNC is on a distinguished road

Here is a lapping machine on eBay small and in your price range:
Click

This is most likely the simpler way to go.
__________________
Dennis
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 10:19 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 2,786
ViperTX is on a distinguished road

Well you're an ME...so you probably already know that the main problem is with how accurately your diamond blade is rotating.....so the spindle for the saw is the biggest problem....figure out how much tolerance different spindles can hold....once you know that then you know how much of your budget is in the spindle.

You could actually use a stop mechanism....you know where you feed the ingot until you meet the physical stop. I'm sure you get the idea.

Last edited by ViperTX; 01-06-2006 at 01:50 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 01-05-2006, 12:08 PM
braidmeister's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 203
braidmeister is an unknown quantity at this point

Making solar cells...or gonna make some semi-conductors?

-Brady
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361