CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Mechanical Engineering > Linear and Rotary Motion


Linear and Rotary Motion Discuss ball/Acme screws, R&P, linear slides and theory here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2005, 12:11 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 117
AustinT is on a distinguished road
any problems mounting teeth on rack up?

I have been thinking the last few days of an easy to build table. The rack for the rack and pinion however has to mounted right side up. The rack will be above the level of the torch by 1 foot. I could mount it on the bottom of the square tube but it will still be exposed to splatter.
Thanks
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2005, 09:43 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Louisville Ky
Posts: 46
Luslugger is on a distinguished road

With the teeth up there will be no shedding of anything that gets on the rack.
Bob
__________________
Robert Setree 502-452-9851
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 12-31-2005, 09:53 AM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,455
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

I've never used a plasma, but have read that they are very messy, with gritty dust getting everywhere. Including the rack I'd assume.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2005, 10:46 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 117
AustinT is on a distinguished road

Thanks for your replies. Ill have to see what else I can come up with. I was going to use 4 V bearings for the X axis. The rails would be a foot above the the table and would be made out of 3 inch square tube. Angle iron would be welded to the side of the tube so that the 90 degree edge was pointed in towards the table. The gantry would use the v bearings horizontally and push into these angle irons. A larger bearing such as a size 3 or 4 would be used because the weight of the gantry would be an axial force on the bearings. The radial force would preload the bearings into the angle iron. Only 4 bearings would be used for the x axis. Because the angle iron is welded to the sides of the tube it leaves the top of the tube open. This would have worked out great for the rack and pinion. The rack would have been on the top of tube. an axle would connect both sides and would be supported by 2 pillow blocks. The pillow blocks would mount on their sides on the gantery so that moving them up or down would change the preload of the gear on the rack.

Thanks for all of your help what a great forum!
Dan
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2005, 01:37 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Australia
Posts: 14
Vaughan Sage is on a distinguished road

If dust simply flying UP is going to be main problem, how about designing in a METAL film seal made from very thin spring steel like shim. The seal would be a full length taught flexible band(s), anchored at each end. 4 largish diameter rollers would direct the tape seal around any torch etc inside a housing box, The splatter would not directly hit your Vee rollers, rack etc. Rack teeth downwards is still to be avoided as muck just builds up & gets rolled in tight, I have that on a LaserKomb paper cutting from Germany... Old defunct waiting for me to try building a CNC drill/mill.????
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 12-31-2005, 02:54 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 2
systemfoxtrott is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Vaughan Sage
If dust simply flying UP is going to be main problem, how about designing in a METAL film seal made from very thin spring steel like shim. The seal would be a full length taught flexible band(s), anchored at each end. 4 largish diameter rollers would direct the tape seal around any torch etc inside a housing box, The splatter would not directly hit your Vee rollers, rack etc. Rack teeth downwards is still to be avoided as muck just builds up & gets rolled in tight, I have that on a LaserKomb paper cutting from Germany... Old defunct waiting for me to try building a CNC drill/mill.????
I think you got it Vaughan teeth up no matter what and debreeis an issue.Im going to ponder over what your saying about this tape seal idea.sounds doable .We used a mesh that looked like what the midevil body suits were made of for debree but I can not remember the nameof it was but it worked.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 03:14 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 31
csrc is on a distinguished road
Flying seal

Originally Posted by Vaughan Sage
If dust simply flying UP is going to be main problem, how about designing in a METAL film seal made from very thin spring steel like shim. The seal would be a full length taught flexible band(s), anchored at each end. 4 largish diameter rollers would direct the tape seal around any torch etc inside a housing box, The splatter would not directly hit your Vee rollers, rack etc. Rack teeth downwards is still to be avoided as muck just builds up & gets rolled in tight, I have that on a LaserKomb paper cutting from Germany... Old defunct waiting for me to try building a CNC drill/mill.????
Sounds like maybe a wide tape measure spring might work, flying with the gantry.If you used a brush wiper and some WD40 the spatter would likely not adhere to the spring.

CSRC
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 01-02-2006, 03:27 PM
Bloy2004's Avatar
Fumbling Machinist
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sturgeon Bay, WI
Posts: 892
Bloy2004 is on a distinguished road

Although I haven't implemented it yet, a possibility would be to use an air jet mounted to travel along the gantry pointed at the rack to lead and clear the teeth as travel takes place. this could be controled from the software and only occur in selectable time intervals.
Besides.. the sound would be cool.....pshsst! pshssssst.!!

This is the machine I'd like to do this to...dropping the flexible air line from above: http://www.cnczone.com/forums/attach...chmentid=11096

..although the racks on this machine are on their sides....
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 12:23 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15
chineguy is on a distinguished road

This would be prone to debris for sure. The cover idea is something similar to designs I have seen used on various machines over the years. Many used a fabric reinforced rubber though. They usually had a internal clock spring style roller to maintain the tension. It might be a time consuming pain to get one to work just right. That's not to say that it can't be done though. Keep in mind that any extra drag that is added will likely need to be compensated for in your drives.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 12:32 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 117
AustinT is on a distinguished road

Ive decided to rethink my design . The previous design although really easy to build had raised rails and the rack facing up. From what I have read these could both be a pain to deal with

Thanks for all the posts
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361