
08-11-2006, 10:03 PM
|
| *Registered* | | Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 104
| |
Originally Posted by Cruiser Hey there CNCPLASTIC, I'd really be interested in hearing more about your counterbalance system and how it reacts with the drive for starting and stopping. I can't help but concider the laws of phisics applied in so far as added mass to the system which must increase the load to the axis drive even tho it is somewhat in a balance. anyway i'd like to hear some first hand account as to the benefits v/s any shortcommings. how about it, you can make it a tutorial of sorts, and if your convincing i may try it on my IH mill and Thanks ! |
I counter balanced the head using two steel cables attached to a bar which runs under the head, its positioned about half way between the column and the front of the head. The cables run straight up vertically to pulleys bolted near the ceiling, then horizontally to a second set of pulleys towards the rear of the mill, then straight down to the 180 pound weight behind the mill.
I can't speak to the physics of counter weighting. All I can say is that before counter weighting the head I had to leave the gib rather loose else the stepper motor would lose steps on up moves. After I counter weighted the head I was able to tighten up the gib quite a bit and retune the stepper because it wasn't working nearly as hard as before on up moves.
Many VMC's are counterweighted, some use weights, others gas cylinders, or more recently some are counterweighted with servo motors.
I think in general terms its best to have improved balance when it comes to the amount of force required to move the head up versus down. Perfect balance would be nice but I did not take it to that level. I felt 180 pounds was sufficient enough of an improvement.
Charles |