CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Hobby Projects > I.C. Engines


I.C. Engines Discuss home made Internal Combustion engines here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 11-11-2008, 04:21 PM
T.L.A.R. eng's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 31
T.L.A.R. eng is on a distinguished road
HAS ANYONE EVER...

Has anyone ever made a swage clamp to reduce the size of a 2-cycle model nitro engine cylinder liner to 're-size' the liner and restore compression?

I have heard others throwing around phrases like 'pinch' etc. I think there are guys doing this in the r/c car industry but it seems to be a hidden black art.

Anyone tried this? What was the results?
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 11-12-2008, 02:28 AM
Kipper's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Age: 47
Posts: 1,059
Kipper is on a distinguished road

Could you "roll" it?
__________________
Keith
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 11-12-2008, 02:36 PM
T.L.A.R. eng's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 31
T.L.A.R. eng is on a distinguished road

I am not sure, never thought of rolling.

From what I have gathered, they use a disc with a slot and bore the hole to the o.d. of the sleeve, then clamp the sleeve using a screw through the slot to 'resize' the sleeve using 1/8 turn incriments of the clamping screw.

However, no one really seems to sure if it works or not. I was wondering if someone here could enlighten me with their experience?

I know in the 'old days' we used to knurl the piston skirts to expand them to fit the egg shaped funnel....I mean bore...but I haven't seen the results of trying to squeeze or roll the sleeve tighter.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 11-12-2008, 07:55 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

I suspect that rolling will only make it larger and never smaller.

If you did succeed at reducing the diameter of the ID, the OD is going to be less, so how will the liner then fit the block? Or what am I missing?

I am not sure what diameter your liner would be, but one notion that comes to mind is using something like an ER collet as a swager. This would be 'cruel and unusual use' of a collet, and you'd likely need to turn up a heavy female taper to support the collet, because you'd be actuating the thing with a hydraulic press.

Most likely you would also want to turn out a male plug to put inside the liner before you swage it in a press, because you need a positive stop so that you don't go too far. I suspect the liner would deform more readily if you can do this at an elevated temperature, I'm not sure how practical that is.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2008, 11:32 AM
T.L.A.R. eng's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 31
T.L.A.R. eng is on a distinguished road

I agree that rolling might be uncontrollable and could probably expand the sleeve the wrong way. I really don't have the equipment capability.
From what I understand, the loss of 'pinch' and compression is wear of .001 or less causing a loss of the oil seal. I am not sure what the effect of loosing .001 o.d. of the sleeve will have overall on the engine. The area to be swaged if I understand correctly, is the just the area above the exhaust opening in the sleeve that gets the swage treatment.
The engine in question is a .015 non ringed r/c truck engine. Why don't I just go out and buy a new sleeve/piston assembly? Naw, too easy. I have a lathe, not enough new projects, and some free time on my hands this winter and I am very curious as how well or not so well this would work. At this point, the only thing I stand to loose is some free time and a worn out piston/sleeve.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2008, 02:06 PM
Kipper's Avatar  
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Age: 47
Posts: 1,059
Kipper is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by HuFlungDung View Post
I suspect that rolling will only make it larger and never smaller.

If you did succeed at reducing the diameter of the ID, the OD is going to be less, so how will the liner then fit the block? Or what am I missing?
Usually these liners are "tophat" shaped...I was thinking along the lines of a 3 wheel knurler with ball races instead of knurls? (if you hit the top of the piston with a hammer..... )
__________________
Keith
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2008, 02:08 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,262
RICHARD ZASTROW is on a distinguished road

You might consider plating the bore.

Dick Z
__________________
DZASTR
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2008, 04:42 PM
dynosor's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 655
dynosor is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by RICHARD ZASTROW View Post
You might consider plating the bore.

Dick Z
Plating the piston might be easier.

How about swaging or upsetting the piston to a larger diameter? You could overdo it and turn it back down on your lathe. Just measure the profile before you start and try to recreate that at a larger diameter.
__________________
Red to red and black to black, or it's ashes to ashes and dust to dust.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 11-13-2008, 06:46 PM
T.L.A.R. eng's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 31
T.L.A.R. eng is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Kipper View Post
Usually these liners are "tophat" shaped...I was thinking along the lines of a 3 wheel knurler with ball races instead of knurls? (if you hit the top of the piston with a hammer..... )
The liner does have a .097 thick flange at the top to locate in the block.
The difference between compression and no compression seems to be very slim. I think the 'pinch' is actually a mechanical wedging at TDC. Then the mechanical wedge goes away after the engine stars and the liner expands to a running fit. Seems the differences in sizes are .0005 and under. Piston being the same size as the taper at the top of the bore being best.
Finiky these little 2-cycles!

I don't think it's possible to expand the light weight piston without breaking it.
Early in my auto repair career some years ago I witnessed a fellow using two large ball pein hammers one on top of the other, to expand the pistons of a 39 Chevy straight six! Lay one ball side down on the center of the piston and strike the face of it with the other hammer repeatedly untill the piston stopped rocking in the bore! Really!

I started to make a swage tool this afternoon, but won't be able to finish it untill next week. My curiosity is really getting the best of me.
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 11-18-2008, 07:15 PM
T.L.A.R. eng's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 31
T.L.A.R. eng is on a distinguished road

I can't beleive I fell for this waste of time!
I made the tool and found that it is possible to swage a brass sleeve to a smaller i.d.
However.....it is hard to tell when enough swage has been applied. To little and the sleeve springs back, to much and the piston no longer fits.
Went too far and the piston no longer fits. No problem, just lap the sleeve....wait......chrome plated i.d. Well that shines real nice now! Still .0009 too small but shines real nice!
I ended up resizing the piston smaller to fit the bore again. Now it has pinch again and seems to have better compression.
The engine is back in the truck and after running it, it really doesn't run any better than it did worn out.
I guess this method isn't exactly tried and true.
Long story short, I should have spent the time doing a customer job instead to pay for a new engine to replace the worn out one. Was really a waste of time in my opinion.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	HPIM1982.jpg‎
Views:	74
Size:	182.3 KB
ID:	69957  
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 11-21-2008, 03:20 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by T.L.A.R. eng View Post
I can't beleive I fell for this waste of time!
I made the tool and found that it is possible to swage a brass sleeve to a smaller i.d.
However.....it is hard to tell when enough swage has been applied. To little and the sleeve springs back, to much and the piston no longer fits.
Went too far and the piston no longer fits. No problem, just lap the sleeve....wait......chrome plated i.d. Well that shines real nice now! Still .0009 too small but shines real nice!
I ended up resizing the piston smaller to fit the bore again. Now it has pinch again and seems to have better compression.
The engine is back in the truck and after running it, it really doesn't run any better than it did worn out.
I guess this method isn't exactly tried and true.
Long story short, I should have spent the time doing a customer job instead to pay for a new engine to replace the worn out one. Was really a waste of time in my opinion.
Don't feel bad! Sometimes you've just got to try stuff and find out how it works out. Wisdom of the present moment arises from experience from the past.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361