CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Hardinge Lathes


Hardinge Lathes Discuss Hardinge Lathes here.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 04-06-2011, 04:50 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 6
Jnice is on a distinguished road
Post Machine manipulation

I'm using a hardinge with a fagor 8025t control, when calculating dimensions and entering them into my program, I'm not getting what is should be. Is there annoying I can do so I don't have to lie to my machine and scrap parts making adjustments? Is it my tool radius? I have my tool radius set, should I have it on zero instead? Will my machine make up the difference?

I have 2 hardinge lathes with 8025t controls. On one lathe to get a radius on round stock I simply add the size of the radius to my -z and subtract it from my dia.

On the second I have to take my radius add my tool radius to my -z the double that and subtract from my x.

Why?
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 04-06-2011, 07:41 PM
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 913
g-codeguy is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
I'm using a hardinge with a fagor 8025t control, when calculating dimensions and entering them into my program, I'm not getting what is should be. Is there annoying I can do so I don't have to lie to my machine and scrap parts making adjustments? Is it my tool radius? I have my tool radius set, should I have it on zero instead? Will my machine make up the difference?

I have 2 hardinge lathes with 8025t controls. On one lathe to get a radius on round stock I simply add the size of the radius to my -z and subtract it from my dia.

On the second I have to take my radius add my tool radius to my -z the double that and subtract from my x.

Why?
It would only work that way if one is set up for radius programming and the other for diameter programming. They both couldn't be set up for the same method of programming (both diameter or both radius programming). If they were, one would be giving you an alarm that the arc was out of tolerance. At least that is the way that it works with the four 8025 lathe controls we have.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 04-07-2011, 02:51 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 6
Jnice is on a distinguished road

Is there a way I can determine which of the two my machines are programmed for? What is the difference between the two as far as creating programs goes? Is this something that can be changed? And if so will it alter any existing programs?

Any and all information is greatly appreciated as I have exhausted myself with studying the programming manual and have multiple questions with no answers!

-J
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 04-07-2011, 06:18 PM
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 913
g-codeguy is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
On one lathe to get a radius on round stock I simply add the size of the radius to my -z and subtract it from my dia.
This lathe is set up for radius programming. If you program

X.375Z.02
G1Z-.7F.004

it will turn a .75 diameter provided your tool geometry is set correctly.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
On the second I have to take my radius add my tool radius to my -z the double that and subtract from my x.
This lathe is set up for diameter programming.

X.375Z.02
G1Z-.7F.004

will turn a .375 diameter.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
Is there a way I can determine which of the two my machines are programmed for?
See above.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
What is the difference between the two as far as creating programs goes?
You've already discovered the difference. A .875 diameter has to be programmed with an X.4375 when the lathe is set for radius programming.

Part radius + insert radius subtracted from the diameter is the correct X-starting point (for an OD radius) on the lathe set for radius programming. 2*(part radius + insert radius) subtracted from the OD diameter is correct for the lathe set to diameter programming.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
Is this something that can be changed?
Yes. It should be a simple parameter change. I would have to look in our manual to see if I can find it for you.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
And if so will it alter any existing programs?
It won't alter the programs, but you will have to. If you switch the radius programming lathe to diameter programming, then all your X-dimensions in all the previously written programs for this lathe will have to be modified.

Most people program in diameter. Easier to program. Simply take the diameters directly from the drawing. Less chance for errors. Easier for the operator to understand. I personally think it is worth the effort to set both lathes to diameter programming. Less confusion. When an operator walks from one to the other, he isn't always trying to remember which is which.

Plus, if I remember correctly, X-offsets work the same way as programming. A .003 offset on the lathe set to diameter programming will move the diameter .003, but will change the diameter by .006 on the lathe set for radius programming.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 04-10-2011, 06:06 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 6
Jnice is on a distinguished road

on the lathe thats believed to be set up for diameter programming, i have a facing program, and lets say i need a 45deg.x .05 +/- .01- in order to achieve a chamfer close to this spec here is my procedure;

1.003-.032(tool radius)-.094=.877 my program will look like this because i have no coolant and want a good finish

g0 g90 g70 g07 t01.01 s2500 m3
x1.025
z0
g92 s3000
g96 s300
g1 x-.05 f.005
x.877 f.008
x1.003 z-.062 f.006
x1.03 f.01
g0 z2.5 m5
m30
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 04-10-2011, 11:34 PM
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 913
g-codeguy is on a distinguished road

First let me say I would not face down and then back up. I do believe in facing from the outside towards the center. The only time I don't is when the wall is thin enough to feed into the face, and then face up. This is seldom for the work I normally do. Using your specs, I would program it this way:


G0 G90 G70 G7 T01.01 S2500 M3
X1.025
Z0
G92 S3000
G96 S300
G1 X-.065 F.005
Z.01
G0 X.8464
G1 X1.003 Z-.0683 F.003
G0 Z2.5 M5
M30

.0183 is the tool nose radius compensation for a 1/32R insert at a 45 degree angle. Some manuals have a chart for TNRC for each whole degree from 0 to 90 degrees and for several different radius inserts. All you really need is from 1 to 45 degree. Just reverse the X-Z values from 46 to 89 degree.

My program would look a bit different as I always swing a radius at all corners to remove any burrs unless the drawing specifically specifies a sharp corner. A .05 x 45 degree chamfer with a 1/32R insert (I use .031) and a .005R on the part would look like this:

G1X.8368Z0F.003
G3X.8878Z-.0105R.036
G1X.982Z-.0576
G3X1.003Z-.08331R.036
G1X1.007Z-.11
OR
G1X1.03F.015 if you preferred a straight pull out move.

This would be a finish move. I would always first make a rouging pass on a chamfer this large.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 04-11-2011, 08:47 PM
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 6
Jnice is on a distinguished road

Im impressed with the level of technicality in the program, when you rough with no coolant what is your g92 and g96 at? also what feed rate do you use?

when in rapid traverse what is the distance you travel from the workpiece? if i wanted to make a rough pass the g0 back for a finish could i trust my machine to not crash at a distance of .05? if this is the case i will change all my programs over to get the same effect on all my parts.

because of you and your advice of reading the manual, i have learned more about this machine in 7 months than my co-workers have since the got the machine 9 years ago! ive ordered a finish tool but, my co-workers are upset with me because of this, so im going to wait before i install it. i have a cutoff installed up to 1 inch, but i have no coolant. so im trying to find the best speed and feed to save inserts.what would you recommend?

again thank you for your help, its appreciated as always.

J-
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 04-12-2011, 07:20 PM
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 913
g-codeguy is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
Im impressed with the level of technicality in the program, when you rough with no coolant what is your g92 and g96 at? also what feed rate do you use?
It depends on the material, DOC, machine's horsepower, etc. Three of our Fagor controlled lathes are manual Hardinge lathes that were converted. One is rated at 1/2 horsepower! The other 2 not much more. The CMS has the most, but these are not really machines for roughing. I have no idea about yours, but if they are similar to ours...and you have to rough...take shallow DOCs at higher feedrates. Higher feedrates being relative. F.005/.008 is high on our lathes taking .02/.03 DOC...again depending on material.

I have to be careful with drills/endmills because I can easily stall the spindle. Normally this is only when I am drilling out a soft collet before boring it to size. I may have to start small (say 3/8 in.), and step drill size up a time or two.

I normally set the G92 to the lathes maximum RPM unless the part is getting too hot. I'll run the G96 a bit slower than when using coolant. If I run a certain grade of insert at 450SFM wet in 316 SS, then I'll probably run it at 350SFM dry.

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
when in rapid traverse what is the distance you travel from the workpiece? if i wanted to make a rough pass the g0 back for a finish could i trust my machine to not crash at a distance of .05? if this is the case i will change all my programs over to get the same effect on all my parts.
Normally I use .02 clearance. Example: face and turn 1 inch material to .95 diameter with 1/64R insert. .005R on part.

G0X1.04Z0
G92S3500
G96S600
G1X-.035F.0035
Z.02F.006
G0X.96
G1Z-.75
X.98
G0Z.02
G1X.89F.015
X.908Z.005
Z0F.002
G3X.95Z-.021R.021
G1Z-.75F.0035
X.97
G0G97Z.5

The funky move at the face of the part is to remove any possible backlash. I use to use the .02/.005 approach for boring bars also, but came to feel I was pushing my luck with some of our operators. I now use .01. Example:

X.57Z.03
G1X.542Z.01F.015
Z0F.002
G2X.5Z-.021R.021
G1Z-...F.004

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
because of you and your advice of reading the manual, i have learned more about this machine in 7 months than my co-workers have since the got the machine 9 years ago! ive ordered a finish tool but, my co-workers are upset with me because of this, so im going to wait before i install it. i have a cutoff installed up to 1 inch, but i have no coolant. so im trying to find the best speed and feed to save inserts.what would you recommend?
Again it depends on material. I've been told that some grades such as M93 from Manchester like heat. It supposedly makes the coating even harder. Cut-offs are one tool I don't try to push. We don't barfeed on our Fagor controlled lathes. Only time I cut-off is when I'm making coolant balls, and I use a narrow double ended Sandvik groove tool. The CMS is the only Fagor controlled lathe we have that could use a 1/8 inch cut-off insert. Even then I'd be skeptical in tougher materials such as stainless steels.

Depending on horsepower, I wouldn't feed any faster than F.002/F.003 (I'd use F.002 to start with if the machine can handle it). Limit max RPM to about 2000/2500. Run SFM at about 50-75% of what the insert catalog suggests to start. If it looks good and isn't getting too hot, increase the SFM a little at a time (maybe 10% increase each time).

Originally Posted by Jnice View Post
again thank you for your help, its appreciated as always.

J-
No problem. Glad to help when I can.
Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
8025t, chamfer, fagor, lie, radius




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help!- Hardinge CBN Turning Machine with GE Fanuc Machine Model CS- 51, S.No. CL – 622 -BSP M.RISHIKESH Hardinge Lathes 1 11-20-2009 06:03 PM
Deep Groove Taig machine would it be a good starter machine Fritzie15 Taig Mills & Lathes 0 09-20-2007 09:37 PM
Acad 2000 Solids Manipulation Question mcyr Autodesk Software (Autocad, Inventor etc) 4 05-13-2007 03:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361