![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Haas Mills Discuss Haas machinery here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Does anyone the correct way to shift the X and Z tool measurements when using a gang holder? I have a TL-1 w/an automatic 4-pos. changer. Not enough for everything I need to do. So I made gang tool holders to double my tool change capacity. Example, I have a spot drill and drill at T4. Both are programmed but the one set for offset 4 is the only one that works. When I call out a new offset, ie. T405 vs. T404, it never shifts and redrills the hole. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| did you change the offset #5 to compesate there has to be diferences in the tool so you need to make nesessery changes to the offset
__________________ individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
When entering the tool offsets you just have to cursor down to the correct line in the table. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I assume T101 is Tool 1 offset 1. and therefore T102 is Tool 1 offset 2, T1<tool number 02<tool offset number Yours seems to be different? |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| For one tool use T101 and put the offsets for this tool in line 1 of the offset table. For the next tool use T111 and put the offsets for this tool in line 11 of the offset table. For the next tool use T121 and put the offsets for this tool in line 21 of the offset table. Do the same for the other locations on the toolchanger. T202 is line 2 in the table. T212 is line 12 in the table. T222 is line 22 in the table. Etc. I find doing it this way makes it easier to identify which offset is associated with which tool in the gang. Normally I make the tool closest in 101, the next one out 111 and the furthest out 121. We do this on all our machines; TL1, GT20, SL10, HL1 to speed up cycle times on small parts. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Ok just broke the tool. maybe I need the offset command? Here is the program: (TOOL - 4 OFFSET - 5) (LDRILL DRILL .125 DIA. INSERT - NONE) G0T0405 G97S1000M03 G0G54X0.Z.25 Z.1 G1Z-.4F.01 G0Z2.25 T0404G96S1000 Z.1 X.1603 G1Z0.F.005 Z-.0471 G2X.1229Z-.076R.0317 X.1234Z-.0797R.0317 G1Z-.1741 X.1092Z-.167 G0X.081 Z.1 X.1703 G1Z0. Z-.0505 G2X.1329Z-.076R.0267 X.1335Z-.0797R.0267 G1X.1334Z-.1741 X.1192Z-.167 G0X.0889 Z.1 X.1803 G1Z0. Z-.0545 G2X.1429Z-.076R.0217 X.1434Z-.079R.0217 G1Z-.1741 X.1292Z-.167 G0X.0989 Z.02 G0X0.Z6.M05 T0400 M01 Offset 4 has a boring bar while offset 5 is a drill. It basically tries to bore with the drill. In other words the gang block never shifts. Help? |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| I think I found your problem; it is not your offsets it is in the program and it is not really a mistake. I think your boring tool must have been shorter than your drill. I set up my TL1, the first picture shows a shot of the graphics display from the program the second picture with a jiggling camera shows the tools. I was using a 1/8" endmill as a boring tool. The third picture shows the offset table for your program with the drill being offset 4 and the boring tool offset 5. I machine a piece of brass successfully. However I did get a scare and I was lucky I did not break a tool. The reason I did not was because my boring tool was slightly longer than the drill. Here is a section of your program showing the place I think your breakage occurred. I have put comments on the relevant lines. % O00000 (TOOL - 4 OFFSET - 5) (LDRILL DRILL .125 DIA. INSERT - NONE) G00 T405 This line sets offset 5; in my case Z is -20.6882 G97 S1000 M03 G00 G54 X0. Z0.25 Z0.1 G01 Z-0.4 F0.01 G00 Z2.25 T404 G96 S1000 This line sets offset 4; in my case Z is -20.6062 Z0.1 This is the guilty line. The offset is now set for the boring tool but the drill is still in position. This line only move Z to Z0.1 using offset 4 but it does not move X so the drill stays in position. In my case offset 4 is 0.082 more positive than offset five so the drill stops 0.182" away from the work. If the boring tool had been shorter then offset 4 would have been closer and at this move the drill would have rammed into the work. The solution is to put the X move before the Z move so that the correct tool is in place. Below is how I would do the offsets and this is also shown in the fourth picture. Instead of using 4 and 5 I use 4 and 14. The first tool to do anything, the drill in this case, I make Tool 404 using offset 4 and the next tool is Tool 414 using offset 14. % O00000 (TOOL - 4 OFFSET - 4 AND 14) (DRILL .125 DIA. OFFSET 04) (BORING TOOL OFFSET 14) G00 T404 G97 S1000 M03 G00 G54 X0. Z0.25 Z0.1 G01 Z-0.4 F0.01 G00 Z2.25 T414 G96 S1000 Z0.1 X0.1603 G01 Z0. F0.005 Z-0.0471 G02 X0.1229 Z-0.076 R0.0317 X0.1234 Z-0.0797 R0.0317 G01 Z-0.1741 X0.1092 Z-0.167 G00 Z0.1 X0.1703 G01 Z0. Z-0.0505 G02 X0.1329 Z-0.076 R0.0267 X0.1335 Z-0.0797 R0.0267 G01 X0.1334 Z-0.1741 X0.1192 Z-0.167 G00 Z0.1 X0.1803 G01 Z0. Z-0.0545 G02 X0.1429 Z-0.076 R0.0217 X0.1434 Z-0.079 R0.0217 G01 Z-0.1741 X0.1292 Z-0.167 G00 Z0.02 G00 X0. Z6. M05 T400 M01 % And if your boring tool was not shorter than your drill I don't know what went wrong. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Once again Geof, thank you. However, I did get it working before I read this by adding G0 G54 X0. Z1. right before the new offset call out of T414. The Z plane at 1" was my check. How does this differ from what you had? I'm assuming the X move did the trick since the command was modal? |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
|
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| Geof is it safe to assume that a Haas Lathe will cancel the last offset like this: G0G40G80G99M5 G28U0W0M9 G50S2000M41 T0100M8<<<<<<<<<<<Tool Index G96S750M3 G0X1.25Z.1T0101>>>>>>>>>Tool 1 Offset 1 G41G1Z0F.025 X0F.006 Z.075 G40G0Z1.5 T0100>>>>>>>>>>>Cancel Offset G0X1.25Z.1T0121>>>>>>>>>>>Tool 1 Offset 21 G71P10Q20U.01W.008D500F.01 N10G41G0X.4 G1Z0F.006 X.5Z-.05 Z-1.0 N20X1.25 G40G0 Z1.5M9 T0100>>>>>>>>>>>>Cancel Tool Offsets G28U0W0 etc. etc. I found that Canceling the last offset has fewer problems than calling a new one. Provided that the tool is in a safe position to cancel the last offset (at least 3 times the nose radius away from the work piece).
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Datum Shift with TNC530 | Bubbles | General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) | 1 | 07-20-2006 05:23 PM |
| Gang tool cnc mini? | Call Maker | Mini Lathe | 6 | 03-26-2006 11:38 AM |
| offset shift and part off | nitemare | Daewoo/Doosan | 1 | 03-03-2006 09:49 PM |
| Anyone need help on 3rd shift?? | AMCjeepCJ | Milltronics | 0 | 12-22-2005 01:34 AM |
| Grid Shift | scuba | General Metal Working Machines | 1 | 10-13-2004 03:50 PM |