CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Haas Mills


Haas Mills Discuss Haas machinery here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 12-10-2006, 06:24 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: peru
Posts: 65
alain aleman is on a distinguished road
rotary shoulder connections on TL-3

Hi guys, i have a TL-3 and i have problems to make rotary shoulder connection, the principal trouble is the vibration, the thread look so shake it and the tool chatter continously, someone make this connection for oilfield industry using TL Haas lathe model?

Sorry for my english, i from Peru.

Alain
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 12-10-2006, 11:56 PM
WOLOG's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOUMA,LA
Posts: 352
WOLOG is on a distinguished road

Alain,

What connections are you cutting? I have had this problem also. It has to do a lot with the setup and all the other associated things you might expect. Give me some info and I will try to help. Do you know that you can change your rpm's for a thread as long as your starting "Z" point is an increment of the thread pitch from "Z 0" Ex. 8 pitch=.125 , thread starting point... Z.250, Z.375, and so on.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 12-12-2006, 10:29 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: peru
Posts: 65
alain aleman is on a distinguished road
rotary shoulder connections

Originally Posted by WOLOG View Post
Alain,

What connections are you cutting? I have had this problem also. It has to do a lot with the setup and all the other associated things you might expect. Give me some info and I will try to help. Do you know that you can change your rpm's for a thread as long as your starting "Z" point is an increment of the thread pitch from "Z 0" Ex. 8 pitch=.125 , thread starting point... Z.250, Z.375, and so on.
Hi Wollog, i make the following connection: REGULAR, INTERNAL FLUSH, H-90, EXTERNAL UPSET END, NON UPSET AND MORE, BUT THESE ARE THE PRINCIPAL THAT A COMPANY MANUFACTURE.

This is the program:

%
O00040 (MOLINO 5 1/2 X 20)
T101 (2 7/8 REG PIN)
(DESBASTE-ACABADO)
G20
G50 S1000
G97 S900 M03
G96 S300
G54 G00 X5. Z0.1 M08
/ G71 P1 Q2 U0.014 W0.008 D0.05 F0.012
N1 G42 G00 X4.9 Z0.1
G01 X1.875 F0.005
X2.193 Z-0.159
X2.89 Z-2.875
Z-3.3125
G02 X3.015 Z-3.375 R0.062
G01 X3.578
X3.875 W-0.1485
Z-15.75
X4.6457 Z-16.
W-0.75
N2 G40 X4.9
G54 G00 X5. Z0.1
/ G70 P1 Q2
G00 X8.
M00


T202 (ROSCA 2 7/8 REG)
G20
G50 S1000
G97 S150 M03
G54 G00 X3.3 Z0.1 M08
G76 X2.6544 Z-2.875 I-0.38 K0.1178 D0.022 F0.2
G00 X4.5 Z0.1 M09
X8.
M30
%
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08272.JPG‎
Views:	97
Size:	150.4 KB
ID:	27164   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08273.JPG‎
Views:	109
Size:	129.6 KB
ID:	27165   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08274.JPG‎
Views:	113
Size:	153.8 KB
ID:	27166  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 12-12-2006, 11:34 PM
WOLOG's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOUMA,LA
Posts: 352
WOLOG is on a distinguished road

OK,

How much of the connection is out of the chuck? I would say that a lot has to do with the insert you are using. Are you using "V bottom" style inserts? I have more problems with those type inserts. They do not have any type of chip breaker which can cause chatter. Another thing that you may try is setting your thread insert height a little low rather than right on center. Are you using coolant or cutting oil. As much as I hate to poor cutting oil in my semi-synthetic coolant, it works much better. The coolant is not slick enough for threading deep threads.

Try threading a little slower. You may have to slow down to about 50 rpms for the last couple of passes. I would also try getting rid of the G76 and go to G32. You have better control of your threading. Also, try taking deeper cuts. Light cuts leads toward chatter.

Let me know if any of this works. I will look at some of my programs to see if anything looks similar. I guess the material you are cutting is 4140HT?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 12-13-2006, 10:24 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 38
CNCBoss is on a distinguished road

We use to thread rotary shoulder tools. The best advice I can give is check your workholding. Chuck up as close to the thread as possible, use pie jaws to increase surface contact and damped chatter. Make sure your toolholder is as close in as possible. If the tool hangs out too much you will get chatter. If all else fails use the tailstock and center in the connection. After that it is all about finding the "sweet spot" for speed. Good luck.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 12-13-2006, 04:44 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: peru
Posts: 65
alain aleman is on a distinguished road
rotary shoulder connections

Wolog, i try to make with 50 Rpm but is same. The insert has a special geometry , and center tool is ok, also i trying with 0.017" deep of cut per pass, nothing. you are right, the material is SAE 4140.

Hi, CNCBoss. IŽll be thankfull if you send me some pictures when you make this kind of connections (rotary shoulder connections), i tell you that i used the tailstock because the leng of the crossover that i make is 20" or 25" and the diameter of 5" to 6", my HAAS TL-3 has 3.5" of spindle bore. Also I use steady rest, also nothing.

Thank guys for your attention,

Greetings from Peru.

Alain
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 12-13-2006, 08:11 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 212
DEAN is on a distinguished road

It looks to me like toolholder is not rigid enough. The insert is not staying in the cut because of rigidity or geometry.
What does your insert look like? Are you sure it is seated in the tool holder correctly?
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 12-13-2006, 09:56 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 56
pdoherty is on a distinguished road

alain,

I bet that sounded awful when it was running. Makes me cringe thinking about it.

A depth of 0.017" or even 0.012" per pass seems like a lot, especially that far away from the chuck. We don't do these types of connections, but we do cut a lot of 4 TPI 60 degree threads and sometimes ACME and we normally go 0.005" per pass and this is on a box way Daewoo lathe. Sometimes we go more, but we usually start at 0.005".

The other trick that we learned is to make that center hole as big as possible. We use a 1.25" diameter combined drill & countersink and bury it in the end of the part. This provides way more contact with the live center in the tailstock and much better support/dampening.

If you have a way to program 'zig-zag' threading (cutting alternating flanks each pass) that would help also. I'm a little weak on G Code programming but I believe that most CAM lathe packages have this cycle.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 12-13-2006, 11:04 PM
WOLOG's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: HOUMA,LA
Posts: 352
WOLOG is on a distinguished road

Alain,

You may need a bigger machine. The fact that you are using the tailstock/steadyrest is a problem with a connection that far away from the chuck. The TL-3 Big Bore has a 8.8 or so hole. I really don't think you will have a lot of luck with a Tl-3 standard machine if you are doing a lot of connections and crossover subs. Have you tried to use the tailstock and the steady rest at the same time? I know that will only help with the pin; however, that's half of the battle. Post some pictures of the toolholder and the inserts and such.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 12-14-2006, 09:43 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: peru
Posts: 65
alain aleman is on a distinguished road
rotary shoulder connections

Ok guys, here post another pictures where looking the toolholder with the insert and the part to cut. Dear pdoherty, thanks for your advice but i got a questions, you say me that i should put 0,005" per pass but in HAAS control exists a formula to obtain the deep of cut, D= K/ sqrt N.

D: deep of cut per pass
K: high of thread (radius value)
N: number of passes

If i put 0,005 in "D" and the value of "K" for the thread that i cut is 0,11784", i obtain more than 500 passes. What are you think about it?

Thank you for your time.

Alain
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08025.JPG‎
Views:	88
Size:	132.8 KB
ID:	27287   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08026.JPG‎
Views:	114
Size:	136.2 KB
ID:	27288   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08027.JPG‎
Views:	67
Size:	131.3 KB
ID:	27289   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08028.JPG‎
Views:	72
Size:	137.3 KB
ID:	27290  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08029.JPG‎
Views:	68
Size:	153.9 KB
ID:	27291   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC08030.JPG‎
Views:	72
Size:	132.9 KB
ID:	27292  
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 12-14-2006, 09:54 AM
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 38
CNCBoss is on a distinguished road

Are you infeeding this thread? Radial feeding will put too much surface contact and cause chatter.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 12-14-2006, 12:46 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 56
pdoherty is on a distinguished road

Alain,

It looks like you are doing 'constant load' threading.

The constant load cycle reduces the depth of cut as the thread gets deeper, so I guess 0.005 is not a good place to start unless you can specify a minimum depth of cut. Looking at the Haas Lathe manual, it appears that there is a way to do this.

There is also a way to change the infeed angle as CNCBoss has suggested.

Based on your photos, I would definitely want to have that live center go deeper into the part - i.e. a bigger center hole.

It looks like you are using a 'top-notch' style insert, so there should not be any helix angle issues the way there are for 'lay-down' inserts.

I wish I knew the details on the Hass threading cycles better, but I don't. Sorry.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353