![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Haas Lathes Discuss Haas lathe here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
What a weekend. I've scrapped $75 worth of brass bar trying to make some very simple parts. I thought I had a handle on this but I guess not. The part is a very simple shape. It's a 0.5" shank, going into a 0.75" ball on the end (right side of the bar). I start by using a G71 to rough the ball from zero to 90 degrees on the end of the bar. It's a standard right-turn, inserted tool. I'm using Tool Nose Compensation (TNC) so the ball will end up being true. The cutter radius is in the offsets page (0.032") and I'm using Tip direction 3. From all I see in the manual, I treat this machine as if I'm using an SL type lathe and that all of the tip directions are from the back of the part (backward from what we see on a Toolroom Lathe). That end turns just fine. Then I do a G75 with the parting tool to cut a clearance valley on the other end of the bar (closer to the chuck). After the clearance is cut, I go after the 0.5" shank and completing the ball shape. This is a standard, LH turning tool, also with 0.032" radius. I specified Tip Direction 4 in the offsets. The problem is that it cuts just fine through the roughing phase of G71 but when it gets to the final pass, it seems that the TNC kicks in but does it in the wrong direction (cutting waaaayyy into the part--ruining it). I thought it was I,K values or something else but this shows up in Graphics as well. If I turn the Tip Direction to zero (in Offsets), it looks fine. What am I doing wrong? I thought that for outside turning, RH-turn=tip direction 3 and LH-turn= tip direction 4. Am I missing something? Help?
__________________ Greg |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks Geof. Forgive my verbose code. While I'm learning, I script what I want to do, the add the operations afterward. ![]() The highlighted portion is where it goes bad. From what I'm seeing in Graphics, TNC doesn't take effect until after the roughing is done, then it makes the final passes in G70/71 with TNC. It completely digs into the part...double the radius is my guess (about 0.064") and it does it on the final passes. I can see this in graphics. It's as if the TNC is offsetting to the wrong quadrant. I was using TNC 4. I exaggerated the radius in offsets, then I tried each of the TNC settings to try to identify what it should be using (by the generated path). TNC 6 seems to look right in simulation and on the final part--at least as best as I can tell until I get a radius gauge. The only thing I can think of is the W-0.005 in that G71 line. My understanding from past posts is that W is an offset allowance in Z. And a negative offset in that left facing operation would leave 0.005" of material on the left side (negative Z) of any programmed faces. Did that negative W mess up the TNC?
__________________ Greg |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I feel a bit foolish...I was going to run it through my Simulator; the Simulator that is getting a software glitch fixed. And I was going to compare it with some programs on my TL2...the one that developed the same error as my Simulator; ref. my post on the 250, 251 alarms. So I am not able to do anything. ![]() Obviously short term memory is going.
__________________ An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Never mind. I'm an idiot. Whenever faced with a problem like this, put it down, walk away, get something to eat. ![]() I went out to get something to eat, sat down with the programming manual and figgered' I would take it from the top. There it was: The tool is feeding from left to right. It's tool-left (G41) not tool-right (G42). Everything else I've ever programmed has been from the right so in my mind: outside=G42, inside=G41. How could I be so dumb? I guess that's why they call it 'learning'.
__________________ Greg |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I thought you had to tell it an offset # when you call the tool. I am really glad you brought that to my attention though because I am trying to get comfortable programming a TL-4 and I can learn from your mistakes. Thanlks a Bunch Chris |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I why would you want to do that? You can gang tools at a single tool number on the tool changer and then assign a different offset for each tool in the gang.
__________________ An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
|
Don't see what? The idea of gang tooling and multiple tool offsets? Tool offsets in general?
__________________ An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bridgeport series II interact II tool holders ? | bigtoad170 | Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills | 18 | 02-26-2010 10:14 AM |
| G43.1 - Tool Axis Direction Tool Length Compensatioin | EngTech | Mazak, Mitsubishi, Mazatrol | 8 | 12-06-2007 04:01 AM |
| Missing aArticles – Machine Tool 101 series | sanganaksakha | General Metal Working Machines | 0 | 06-28-2006 06:51 AM |
| Network machines for tool wear offsets | psevin | Product Announcements & Manufacturer News | 0 | 10-24-2005 09:53 AM |