Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 14

Thread: stainless steel 303 lathe part

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    26
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    stainless steel 303 lathe part

    I have a part that I'm running on a haas lathe. We start with 10mm blanks ~.393". I then have to turn the first 2 inches of the part to .25"...

    Right now I'm using a roughing tool with a CNMG432 insert. I'm taking one rough cut at ~ 1600 rpm and .01 feed leaving about .007" for the finish tool. I take two passes with the finish tool - one cut to size and another spring cut. The tolerance on this part is +-.0003". Finish tool is cutting ~1600 rpm at .005 feed CNMG431 insert.

    The roughing tool lasts for about 100 parts which is good enough for us. The finish tool lasts forever since its taking a small cut.

    The issue that I'm having is that I'm not getting a good finish on the parts. I'm not sure if they are deflecting or work hardening from the roughing pass. I'm using flood coolant so i don't think it is heating up too much... Should I change my feeds/speeds?


  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    251
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Try ditching the spring pass. If you have trouble holding size without it try making two finish passes at .0035. I suspect you are roughing up the finish with the spring pass. The insert geometry is critical with that shallow cut. You may not be forming a proper chip. Seco makes a great chip breaker for light radial depths, I have used it for finishing 303 with excellent results. It is the FF1.

    Are you running unsupported?


  3. #3
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    939
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I agree with Tate. The spring pass is causing the problem. Try to increase RPM for a better finish. Use a 35 degree profile tool with .008R if necessary with a ground edge to eliminate chatter. Lot less tool pressure. A VNGP-330.5 will have less tool pressure than a VNGG-330.5 insert. Your idea of roughing in one pass is a good one.


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    236
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I'm not a lathe guy, but for the finish pass, 1600 rpm at .250" diameter is barely above 100 sfm. 303 is free cutting. I'd scream it at 5000 rpm if your lathe and chuck allow it. There is a minimum heat required to get a good shine.


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    US
    Posts
    251
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    5000 rpm sounds great in theory, I suspect the part will start whipping at that speed.


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    236
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    With .25" diameter x 2" long, I assumed he had a live center. Would you still expect problems at that speed with a venter?


  • #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    26
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    i think my machine is locked at 3000 rpm max... i think there is a way to change a setting to allow it to go to 6000 but even at 3000 the machine vibrates too much and I don't know if I'd be able to hold the tolerance...


  • #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    939
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by seawolf217 View Post
    i think my machine is locked at 3000 rpm max... i think there is a way to change a setting to allow it to go to 6000 but even at 3000 the machine vibrates too much and I don't know if I'd be able to hold the tolerance...
    I agree. If the machine is vibrating too much, the part can be up to .003 out-of-round. We got rid of one used lathe we had purchased for that very reason. .0015 was as good as we could get by slowing RPM down (without pumping more money in it). Had to slow the 3 Daewoo Lynxes down to 2000 and sometimes slower before we got the spindles realigned. Out-of-roundness would take up all the tolerance..and more on some jobs...from whip. .002 and less tolerances.


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    432
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by g-codeguy View Post
    I agree with Tate. The spring pass is causing the problem. Try to increase RPM for a better finish. Use a 35 degree profile tool with .008R if necessary with a ground edge to eliminate chatter. Lot less tool pressure. A VNGP-330.5 will have less tool pressure than a VNGG-330.5 insert. Your idea of roughing in one pass is a good one.
    This is good theory, but you don't have to switch your toolholder. I suggest you try a Valenite CNGP43.007 SR grade VP9605. The shape of the insert behind where the cutting happens is of no consequence. This insert is a very upsharp edge with ground periphery, and that's what reduces cutting pressure.

    BTW g-codeguy...a VNGP and a VNGG are the same. One (VNGP) is the ANSI designation, the VNGG is the ISO designation for the same insert. I think you meant a VNGP will have less cutting pressure than a VNMG. This is true.

    Lastly, when the OP says the "machine is locked at 3000rpm", that usually means there's an active G50 limit. Execute a command such as "G50 S4000" to increase it. If it doesn't go higher, then the machine is maxed out at something less than 4000.


  • #10
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    939
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    [QUOTE=BTW g-codeguy...a VNGP and a VNGG are the same. One (VNGP) is the ANSI designation, the VNGG is the ISO designation for the same insert. I think you meant a VNGP will have less cutting pressure than a VNMG. This is true.[/QUOTE]

    That's funny. The VNGP and VNGG inserts we have in stock are not the same. The GG's are flat like an MG (but of course sharp) whereas the P's are higher at the point and are more prone to 'stringing' chips instead of breaking them up.


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    432
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That last character of the 4-letter ANSI designation is the only one of the 4 that can be subjective, depending upon the manufacturer of the insert. If you look at the ANSI shape option for "TYPE" (position 4), the P and the G can both be upsharp edges. The G shape shows a generic chipbreaker top-form geometry with rounded "root", while the P shape shows straight angles to the sharp tip.

    So I guess we're both right.


  • #12
    Registered
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    26
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Do you mean there is a G50 S3000 as the default? I didn't put one in the program since i was programing the RPM directly - G97 S1800... I'll have to check it out when I get a chance... If I get a part with a low enough tolerance I'd like to run it up a lot higher, because right now even at 2000 the machine begins to vibrate a lot...


  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. Stainless Steel
      By jdclark in forum Shopmaster/Shoptask
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 02-24-2009, 11:08 PM
    2. Stainless steel
      By larry53 in forum General Metalwork Discussion
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 04-23-2007, 12:32 AM
    3. RFQ Stainless Steel body part
      By cdarnell in forum Employment Opportunity
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 11-21-2006, 03:03 PM
    4. Steel or Stainless
      By tool_man in forum Casting Metals
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 10-29-2006, 06:46 AM
    5. Is stainless steel
      By CNCadmin in forum Hard and High Speed Machining
      Replies: 12
      Last Post: 10-17-2003, 09:19 AM

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.