CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2009, 04:48 PM
Bill308's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Age: 34
Posts: 8
Bill308 is on a distinguished road
Threading Standard/Metric

Brain teaser question..... Can you use a standard 60 Deg Threading insert to cut metric pitch threads? I was told you could. So I tried it, (non critical part) and it seamed to work. However the part I threaded was a stop for the spindle bore that basically screwed into the back of the bore. Now best guess was that it was a M56x2.0 Thread. I say this because the thread was made in the bore and then bored flush with the ID of the bore so the crest were turned off.

Now having that in mind.... you lose a certain amount of engagement. After threading, testing and recutting several times it finally went in. These threads were cut with a standard 60 Deg insert with a 29.5 plunge angle and a .07874 pitch (had to convert everything from M to S).

Bottom line question... Do you need metric threading inserts to cut metric threads or just use standard inserts the whole way through? This is to settle a debate at work. I looked the thread profiles up in Machinery's Handbook and the angles were the same for both profiles, 60 Deg. Aside from that the thread profile was different.

So any help would be awesome!!
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2009, 07:11 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,622
One of Many is on a distinguished road

I figure if it fits use it.

To the purist this might matter on a print so it can inspected and pass. Yes, there are full form inserts for metric threading. What really matters in your application is functionality of the pitch diameter and final fit. No real need to debate root and crest form to prove right or wrong. That is just being anal for no other reason!

Over/under sized minor/major diameter threads that do not need full strength are common. Full form threads are a bit vulnerable to damage in harsh environments. This also gives clearance for grime displacement reducing the risk of galling and other ham handed abuses. Typically it is one thread or the other(internal or external) and NOT both. You might even see a higbee cut or blunt start threads to help mimimize cross threading in these applications. Moreso on coarser threads though.

DC
__________________
Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2009, 08:44 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,407
martinw is on a distinguished road

Dear Bill308,

It really boils down to to your application, but generally speaking, it is probably a good idea to cut the threads correctly IMVVHO.

If it is a water feature in your back yard, by all means bodge it with incorrect thread forms, and bung in some chewing-gum if it leaks a bit above 5 ps1 . That will work.

If it is a 50 bar pipeline containing oxidising gases, you might want to take a more serious approach..LOL

Best wishes,

Martin
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2009, 09:10 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

If you want to get edicated on threads go here:

http://www.boltscience.com/pages/screw1.htm

If you want a thread for your 750psi air compressor go here:

Dryseal threads. (Covered by the SAE standard J476).
__________________
An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2009, 10:09 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,407
martinw is on a distinguished road

Dear All,

Speaking of bunging up stuff with chewing gum, has anybody got any experience of Loctite 55? It has a great specification, and I really like the idea of winding the stuff over the threads rather than round them.

http://www.loctite55.co.uk/

Does this stuff really work on threads up to 4"??

Any feedback will be most welcome.

Best wishes,

Martin
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 02-06-2009, 01:24 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 166
juergenwt is on a distinguished road

Bill - metric and standard threads use the same inserts - 60 deg.
Was this done on a manual lathe?
If yes - check your compound first. 29.5 deg from the straight in position. Most lathes have the zero setting parallel to your work. That means you compound will have to be on the 60 1/2 deg. mark.
But just how did you get the 2mm (.07874) pitch unless you had a lathe capable of cutting metric thread and than you would use the 2mm pitch setting.
If you had a standard inch lathe you would need a 120/127 gear combination to convert to metric. So I think your problem is most likely with the pitch not being correct.
M56x2 is standard metric fine thread.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-06-2009, 05:22 PM
Bill308's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: US
Age: 34
Posts: 8
Bill308 is on a distinguished road

Martin, thats pretty much the same answer I said...almost word for word...lol I had just never experienced the the whole single point metric threading with a regular threading insert before now. And the other guy had never heard of a metric threading insert before so we're pretty much even...lol All 3 of us learned something.

juergenwt, its not a manual lathe it is a Prototrak 1630, not a bad lil lathe, but has some features I dont really like. Anyways instead of putting in a standard pitch say 1/2-28 of .0357 I took the 2.0mm and converted it over to .07874 and used it on the inch side instead of changing all my offsets to mm and in which case I would put 2.0 where is asked for pitch. As far as the 29.5 deg plunge angle.... thats just a default setting on the threading cycle. It can be changed depending on how much of a cut you want to take per pass.


Thanks! Good info from everybody!
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help!- Metric Threading jroma1 Mini Lathe 1 04-17-2008 09:12 PM
pocket standard Beaker Mastercam 1 11-29-2007 06:00 AM
Help with non-standard pac-sci stepper Argofanatic Stepper Motors and Drives 11 08-21-2007 06:43 AM
Standard tapping and Metric Programming. Dull Tool General Metalwork Discussion 3 02-01-2007 04:09 PM
Standard Ballscrews rhino Linear and Rotary Motion 5 05-13-2006 06:24 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361