CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-08-2007, 09:22 AM
bill south's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: usa
Age: 59
Posts: 587
bill south is on a distinguished road
Which is Best - Deeper Plunge/Faster Feed

This weekend I was milling parts for my bridgeport conversion using .25" 6061 and a 1/8" carbide cutter. I had the speed set at 5 ipm and a plunge of .06" on my lathemaster benchtop. Well, broke 2 mill tools (ouch) and then slowed down the feed to 3 ipm and everything was fine. BTW, using cool tool misting for coolant.
Afterwards, a question came to mind. Which is better A lighter plunge (Maybe .005) and a faster table speed or am I on the right track with a heavy plunge and slow speed?
Can you tell I'm new to machining? Help from an expert will be appreciated.
Bill from Spartanburg.
__________________
billyjack
Helicopter def. = Bunch of spare parts flying in close formation! USAF 1974 ;>)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 01-08-2007, 11:50 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Age: 42
Posts: 442
pastera is on a distinguished road

I think it is more a question of cutter RPM and chip load - at 1920 RPM max you are not even coming close to the recommended cutting speed for aluminum (500-600 SFM for HSS; 2820 carbide).

Take a look at the broken cutters - Is there buildup on the cutting edges?

Aaron
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-08-2007, 01:31 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Age: 71
Posts: 2,209
RICHARD ZASTROW is on a distinguished road

When you plunge straight in, be sure you are using an endmill that is center cutting and has adequate clearance angle to avoid rubbing behind the cutting edge. Remember, the cutters surface speed decreases as the diameter decreases at the same RPM to "0" at dead center.
__________________
DZASTR
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 01-08-2007, 04:01 PM
DareBee's Avatar
Monkeywrench Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stratford, Ont. Canada
Posts: 2,737
DareBee is on a distinguished road

5 IPM is fine as long as you are running maximum RPM (1920) and using a 2 flute cutter.
.06 DOC is good but you MUST be blasting the chips out.
This should work really well.

You don't have enough RPM to make up the time doing light cuts.
__________________
www.integratedmechanical.ca
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-09-2007, 06:30 PM
bill south's Avatar  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: usa
Age: 59
Posts: 587
bill south is on a distinguished road

Thanks guys. That's what I kinda thought. Guess it's time to look at the motor upgrade for more rpm. Always gotta tinker with something!
Bill
__________________
billyjack
Helicopter def. = Bunch of spare parts flying in close formation! USAF 1974 ;>)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-09-2007, 10:08 PM
mrk mrk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 46
mrk is on a distinguished road

I am also still very new to CNC so this topic is of interest to me since I am doing a good bit of work with 6061.

I was once told that on machines with limited spindle speed it is best to stick with HSS and avoid carbide end mills?

Yesterday I was cutting a .400" deep slot with a .250" EM using .1" DOC and flood coolant. On the first cut, I did not turn on the coolant until a few seconds into the cut I also did not have it on full blast. The result was the EM clogged up right away (I hit the E-stop before anything bad happened). After that I changed my coolant spray system to use a full pressure stream so the chips would get cleared away and was able to cut 10 IPM with .100 DOC at a speed of 3500 RPM.

I actually am trying to adjust my thinking to use surface speed (i.e. fpm) and chip load rather then thinking in rpm and feed rate.

In general I use a cutting speed of 260 fpm for my 6061 calculations. Since my CNC has a max spindle speed of 3500 RPM I adjust the surface speed rates and chip load for the calculations when working with small tools. I also find that flood coolant makes a big difference and it is important to have enough pressure to clear the chips away from the cutting zone.

With a .125" EM I would use a cutting speed of 115fpm and a chip load of .001". The calculations I use for RPM come from the WIKI page. I also try to use about 50% of the tool size as the maximum DOC. I am still simply guessing at chip load. With a small EM I usually get nervous and reduce the chip load so in the case of a .125" at 115fpm I might use .001" chip load for a feed of 7ipm.

With bigger tools I use .005" chip load and a surface speed of 260fpm since my machine can turn them fast enough. Based on some of the comments I see on the forum wonder if I should use a larger cutting speed value for my calculations.



p.s. Soaking EMs in drano is a good way to clean them off if they are clogged with aluminum since the drano will melt the aluminum. Just be careful to treat the drano with respect.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:09 AM
DareBee's Avatar
Monkeywrench Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stratford, Ont. Canada
Posts: 2,737
DareBee is on a distinguished road

MRK

Yes and no to HSS in small diameter.

NO you don't need carbide for tooth wear issues.
YES you DO need carbide because small dia HSS endmills flex like a SOB

My rule of thumb is never use HSS for cutters smaller than 1/4"
Example pricing for 2 FL 1/4 dia
"China" brand HSS $6
"China" brand HSS TiN $6.50
Niagara Cutter HSS $14
"NN USA" carbide $14
"NN USA" carbide TiN $17
Niagara Elite carbide TiCN $32

As you can see accept for the China cutter that the carbide is so close in price it might as well be used anyway.

IMO for aluminum cutting, a cutter such as the Elite will cut machining time by 30-50% and outlast an uncoated carbide 3 - 1. How do you beat those numbers?
__________________
www.integratedmechanical.ca
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 01-10-2007, 12:42 PM
mrk mrk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 46
mrk is on a distinguished road

Thanks!

I will put carbide on my shopping list.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353