CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 12-04-2006, 12:54 AM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 239
jl123 is on a distinguished road
Tool Coatings

I'm shopping around for some new end mills both standard and ball. I'm confused what these different coatings do and whether or not they can be used with coolant. TiCN and TiALN are the two that I'm looking at as I cut mostly aluminum. I read somewhere that TiALN is suitable for dry milling and the heat actually makes the coating perform at its best. Does this mean I can't use coolant? I'm just looking for long lasting/tough cutters. I have a X3 so I'm wondering what I should go with. I plan on using a fog busters coolant system.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-04-2006, 01:05 AM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road

Those two coatings are ok to use coolant. They will keep the edge of the tool sharp for a while longer than uncoated tooling. Coatings help chip evacuation too.

Coatings also allow for a higher temp range as well as higher RPMs and Feedrates, but not by that much.
__________________
Toby D.
"Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
Schwarzwald

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

www.refractotech.com
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 12-04-2006, 01:15 AM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 239
jl123 is on a distinguished road

Any one of them better suited for aluminum than the other?
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-04-2006, 01:24 AM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by jl123 View Post
Any one of them better suited for aluminum than the other?
The TiCN i see the most in aluminum, but both are great coatings.

The TiALN (Titanium Aluminum Nitride) are better siute for exotic materials like Stainless, Inconel, Monel, Waspalloy, Haynes, and Hastalloy. Never Titanium for either of these tool coatings.
__________________
Toby D.
"Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
Schwarzwald

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

www.refractotech.com
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 12-04-2006, 03:59 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CH
Posts: 82
kalmah is on a distinguished road

DLC coating works very well with aluminium. You can machine without coolant aluminium with DLC coating . As example, Mitsubishi, OSG produce insert for dry machining of aluminium. In order to keep the sharp edge, the thickness is very low (0.3micrometers).
The disadvantage of this coating (lack of adhesion) is now resolved.

The advantage:
High hardness (>4000 HV)
Low friction coefficient 0.1

The disadvantage:

Maximal temperature : 500 °. It's not a problem when you machine aluminium. The temperature are always lower.
It's impossible to use this coating with steel, cast iron
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 12-04-2006, 10:48 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: usa
Posts: 376
little bubba is on a distinguished road

I tend to use TiCN on a wet application, and TiAlN on dry applications. I've heard but never verified that the Al in TiAlN coatings make them undesirable for use in milling aluminum, I've never had a problem running TiAlN wet in aluminum, though I don't get to play with aluminum much.

One thing that I have noticed and avoid like the plague is running a TiAlN coatings wet in steels. We had a long run job in A286 and TiAlN coated roughers consistantly gave 30% less tool life than the uncoated roughers, running wet. A little food for thought, I'm not sure why it happened, but it did.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 12-04-2006, 09:07 PM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by little bubba View Post
I tend to use TiCN on a wet application, and TiAlN on dry applications. I've heard but never verified that the Al in TiAlN coatings make them undesirable for use in milling aluminum, I've never had a problem running TiAlN wet in aluminum, though I don't get to play with aluminum much.

One thing that I have noticed and avoid like the plague is running a TiAlN coatings wet in steels. We had a long run job in A286 and TiAlN coated roughers consistantly gave 30% less tool life than the uncoated roughers, running wet. A little food for thought, I'm not sure why it happened, but it did.
Thermal Shock is why your tool broke down so fast. Plus some Cemical Factors played a roll. I don't know a lot about Cemicals but if you have ever made the mistake of mixing Amonia and Bleach, you get the picture.
__________________
Toby D.
"Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
Schwarzwald

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

www.refractotech.com
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 12-04-2006, 09:46 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: US
Posts: 247
ctate2000 is on a distinguished road

TiALN is great when using HSS on aluminum. I use coolant with it and have no problems. The coolant seemed to help tool life. IMHO if you want the best bang for the buck use solid carbide uncoated for small tools .5 and less and coated HSS for the larger tools over .5. If you are moving large amounts of material and use large tools frequently then solid carbide is cost effective. I have found that small runs with light removal rates the coated HSS was a more cost effective choice for the large tools because of lower initial cost and becasue freqeuent handling makes them more suseptable to damage.

The alloy also makes a difference. If you are milling 6061, 7075 or similar alloys then coated HSS is a good choice. If you are milling die castings you need carbide or PCD to get any life.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 12-05-2006, 12:46 PM
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 239
jl123 is on a distinguished road

My tooling is limited but lately I've scored some nice carbides off ebay. I bought 10 uncoated 1/4" EMs for $50 shipped from this company called attitude cutting tools I believe. They're now putting reserves on thier auctions now. Haven't tried them but they look really good but I'm just waiting on setting up a coolant system before giving them a run.

I wanted to try out some coated tooling so thats the reason for this thread.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361