![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| I need to turn and then mill some pieces on stainless steel and I have the liberty of choosing the kind of it to be used. The turning part should be no problem, but the milling may be problematic, I need to mill 1/16 slots on the perimeter. I plan to use carbide 2 flute endmills. What would be my best choice, easier to machine is priority number 1, 2 and 3 ![]() My bet is 303 but Im all ears Thanks in advance Pablo |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| 303 is your best bet. The one thing you didn't include in your post that is very important is application. What is the function that you intend for these parts. That is one of the main keys in selecting a material. Post your intended use and others can give good solid replies to your question.
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Its a kind of ring, it just needs to be harder and more durable than aluminium, thats why they choosed SS and I agree, but I want my work to be simple so I want to be sure the kind of SS I choose is the most easy to machine. These 1/16 end mills look so fragile... Thanks Pablo |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| 1/16 end mills are. As long as you don't try to remove a lot of material in one pass you should be fine. What type of Mill do you have?
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| No, the "L" in 304L doesn't mean leaded like it does in alloy steels. The difference is that there's .05% less carbon and 1% more nickel than in 304. I don't know about turning and milling, but 304L is one of the worst materials to have to drill in. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| 303 has a machinability index of 73. 304 is 45. 304L is 44. 316 is 40. 416 is 90, but is magnetic if that matters.. Higher the index, the easier it is to machine. CD1212 has a index of 100 304L is designed to produce better quality welds than regular 304 due to less carbon content as mentioned..the lower carbon content is an effort to avoid harmful carbide precipitation in the weld zone.
__________________ (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| From McMaster-Carr (About Stainless Steel) Machinability: Stainless steel is more difficult to cut, drill, ream, tap, thread, etc. than steel because of its higher strength and hardness. It tends to become gummy when machined, however, high-speed steel tooling generally can be used. The ratings given are in relation to speed, life of the tooling, and the ease of attaining a satisfactory post-machining finish. Excellent: 303, 416 Good : 304, 316, 410, 430 Fair: 301, 302, 309, 321, 420 Poor: 420V, 440C, 15-5 PH, 17-4 PH, Nitronic 60, A286 |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
The "L" in 304L or 316L Means Low Carbon. This decreases the Machinability Rating.
__________________ Toby D. "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names" Schwarzwald (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) www.refractotech.com |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |