CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 06-18-2006, 01:34 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road
Milling rigidity question

I have two 1.25" Thompson shafts 41" long and two Thompson double pillow block bearings. I'd like to use them for an X axis to build a machine in a conventional mill setup. My question is since these are unsupported shaft's, would they be strong enough resist tool chatter when milling mild steel. I know this is a pretty abstract question whithout getting into cutter size, speed, depth of cut.... Just looking for an opinion if it would be so limiting in cutter and cut sizes and speeds if I'm wasting my time.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	thompson inc and quarter.JPG‎
Views:	153
Size:	190.4 KB
ID:	19031  
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 06-18-2006, 03:18 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 402
fkaCarel is on a distinguished road

If I see this configuration lying on your table, I see the blocks opening up, under eccentric load. So with four blocks, which then don't have to be double, things get better. The stroke would be limited, which is again better. Put them as far apart as possible. And for the sake of the experiment, you can always add a dimension by using four rails.

Carel
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 06-18-2006, 05:52 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

You can draw something of an analogy to a boring bar on a lathe. You will have two bars each supported at the ends with the middle supporting a cutting tool. Typically boring bars can be expected to be stiff enough to not chatter if the length is not more than about maybe six times the diameter. In your case that is almost 8 inches but you have two supported at each end so maybe a 32 inch span is feasible if both ends of each bar are rigidly attached. In other words clamped down in the same manner as a boring bar would be.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 06-19-2006, 07:03 AM
DareBee's Avatar
Monkeywrench Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stratford, Ont. Canada
Posts: 2,783
DareBee is on a distinguished road

Also

With open bearing blocks like that, your shaft CAN (and should IMO) be fully supported.
Buy or build 2 mounting rails and drill the shafts to suit.
__________________
www.integratedmechanical.ca
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 07:46 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 85
dberndt is on a distinguished road

I'm no engineer. But my beam calculations for these rods with only the load of a light table on top to be atleast .004" or something like that in the middle. With cutting forces this would surely lead to parts that were out of size in all sort of fun ways as the load moves with the table changing the point load on the beams. This might work for a wood router or something like that but I don't think you'd have much fun with this setup in mild steel.

Support the rail fully on in several places atleast.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 08:44 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 79
Posts: 197
wjfiles is on a distinguished road

The nature of your shaft would come into play.
Are they mild steel ?
I am using induction hardened and ground shaft for increased stiffness
Bfiles
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 09:21 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 85
dberndt is on a distinguished road

The type of steel you are using and its hardness has relatively little to do with how much deflection you will see over a span. The young's modulus (elastic bending) of all steels is within a fairly narrow band of ranges.

The difference in alloying and heat treating comes in wear properties and tensile strength. Better alloys will simply bend further before breaking. But the amount of bending pound per pound will be quite similar.
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 11:32 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 34
drummond1 is on a distinguished road

A machines stress limitation is something all machinists learn to adapt to. Cutting forces and mechanical stress have been for the most part ignored by modern day machine tool builders. Thats why the life expectancy of a machine has so greatly diminished. Depth of Cut and surface speed will greatly reduce deflection stress. Your primary objective is to handle the heat between your cutter edge and material to be cut. Some great advances are out there in Cutter composition and Cutter geometry that reduce cutter pressures significantly. Either way.. the more rigid the setup the more snot you can put onto your tool. Its all relative.. Best of luck mate.
__________________
General Machinist / CNC contract Instructor
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 08:04 PM
pminmo's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Peters, Mo USA
Age: 59
Posts: 3,325
pminmo is on a distinguished road

These are Hardned Thompson shafts, 60C rock as I recall. I suspect to have a qualified shop drill and tap would be expensive.

I also have wondered since the cutter would always be directly above the linear bearings, if I were to incorporate sometype of bearing assembly if I could minimize the deflections becuase of the open shafting.
__________________
Phil, Still too many interests, too many projects, and not enough time!!!!!!!!
Vist my websites - http://pminmo.com & http://millpcbs.com
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 06-19-2006, 09:39 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 85
dberndt is on a distinguished road

Install a flat steel plate below the bearings and put uhmw or teflon slides on the bottom of the table. Make it .0005" clearance or something like that. Now you've got some way to fight deflection.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 06-19-2006, 10:01 PM
tobyaxis's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 4,396
tobyaxis is on a distinguished road
Red face Good Idea

Not a machine builder, but just my 2 cents,

The configuration is nice , but I would definately look into a way to make it more rigid than it is now. There are some great ideas here in this Thread that will help.

4 rails bolted down like linear ways is a good idea and mount your second set of pillow blocks with the opening facing in the opposite direction. example One set of rails bolted to the frame of the Y axis and the other to the Table. assembly will be a pain to line up. Over kill is better than not having enough.

Looks good though, good luck on your project.

tobyaxis
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 06-20-2006, 06:29 AM
DareBee's Avatar
Monkeywrench Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Stratford, Ont. Canada
Posts: 2,783
DareBee is on a distinguished road

Your "Thomson" rails are case hardened to a depth of about .06.
You can mark the hole locations and grind through the case hardenend surface. Now you can drill and tap with conventional tooling, carefully of course.

If you want to bring them to me I could always EDM tap them from hard ;-)
__________________
www.integratedmechanical.ca
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361