CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 04-02-2006, 09:25 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 40
glbreil is on a distinguished road
Advise Needed

I am cutting shapes out of 3/4 thick mild steel using a MillPort Rhino 40B bed mill. One pass around my shape is about 40".

My question is your recommendation on tooling, cutting speed and feed, etc?

My last I have cut with a 3/8 carbide end mill in 6 passes 1/8" deep each. It is slow and I have broken some end mills as well.

What can I do to speed up the process?

Thanks in advance! Gary
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 04-02-2006, 09:49 PM
*Registered*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,628
lakeside is on a distinguished road

CARDIBE WILL BREAK VERY EASY YOU MAY WANT TO FIRST USE A RUFFING MILL LEAVE .03 ON SIDE FEEDS AND SPEEDS WITHOUT KNOWN SETUP AND MACHINE RPMS IS JUST GOING TO BE A GUESS I CAN GIVE YOU THE DEFUALT VAULS BUT ITS A STARTING PIONT HERE A LIKE LOOK FOR RUFFING MILLS IN THIS SITE WWW.MSCDIRECT.COM BALL PARK 500 RPMS 4IPM FLOOD COOLANT
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 04-02-2006, 10:10 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,739
Ken_Shea is on a distinguished road

Gary,
What speed and feed, number flutes, coolant were you using?

Breakage does not necessarily mean you are feeding to fast, but that RPM may be set too slow for that feed.

Also carbide can take quite a bit of heat but will trashed quickly if suddenly cooled while hot.



Ken
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 04-02-2006, 10:40 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,622
One of Many is on a distinguished road

One option. Send them out and have the shapes plasma, laser or water jet cut if this is cut all the way through your plate. The cost is nothing compared to the time spent turning it into chips that could be used more wisely. Have them cut oversize if a machined edge is required. Finish them off with a larger cutter.

Rough guess for a 3/8" 4flute endmill. 800-1100rpm at .002 chip load feeding at 4-8 in/min(my experience says 2-4in/min would be more realistic for a full width cut at .125). Flood coolant you might be able to push it twice as fast on rpm so that feed rate would be likewise.

DC
__________________
Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade.
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 04-02-2006, 11:54 PM
dertsap's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 3,668
dertsap is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

do you have an insert mill to do the roughing then use your carb. em to finish , i would never recommend hss cutter on steel
verimill makes some tough carbide endmills you can run them much faster and harder, try high helix ,
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 04-03-2006, 06:08 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 40
glbreil is on a distinguished road

I was using a .375" 2 flute mill at 900 rpm and 1.7 feed with mist oolant to help blow chips away.

I may have made it sound as if breakage was a real problem. Not really to bad it is just not very forgiving. If anything goes wrong it breaks.

I thought I might be able to move faster by using a larger size mill that could be pushed a little harder. Just not sure of the best option.

"One of Many" may be right on sending them out, but then I wouldn't be making them and thats what it is all about. Right?

Thanks Gary
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 04-03-2006, 06:59 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,739
Ken_Shea is on a distinguished road

From my what I am seeing on speed and feed specs you should be able to double the RPM and feed, You are correct, as a rule of thumb always use the largest cutter you can, also a 4 flute will give better performance on steel. Check to be sure the cutting edges are still sharp.

but then I wouldn't be making them and thats what it is all about. Right? Well, that does seems right but does not always offer the best return of time / money, but that is what it is all about to most of us most of the time.
It goes against the grain to purchase all that equipment just to have someone else make something, I agree.
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 04-03-2006, 08:25 AM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 40
glbreil is on a distinguished road

You mentioned speed and feed spec's, where can you find some rules to govern your settings. For instance I have a publication that says for mild steel to operate at approx 90 sfm which is what I was shooting for. But as for the depth of cut (.125) it was just a guess. Is there something out there that puts all that information in one place?

Thanks Again Gary
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 04-03-2006, 08:39 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,739
Ken_Shea is on a distinguished road

Gary,
For me MEPro has been one of my most used tools.
There is also a lot more to this software then feeds and speeds.
It is usually on the conservative side with regards to feed and speed results, which I like, keeps me out of trouble while I gain experience

http://www.cncci.com/products/cncmepro.htm


Ken
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 04-03-2006, 09:11 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,622
One of Many is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Ken_Shea
but then I wouldn't be making them and thats what it is all about. Right? Well, that does seems right but does not always offer the best return of time / money, but that is what it is all about to most of us most of the time.
It goes against the grain to purchase all that equipment just to have someone else make something, I agree.
Yes, I would also agree that it is questionable to send them out, but the idea was to save cycle time. At 1.7in/min the cycle time 20+ minutes per pass times what 7-8 passes? That is better than 160min/part. The cost of outside time would be 30 min/part or less on more suitable equipment.

With material removal rates, it does not always pay to use a larger cutter on 2D profile cuts. When the cutter diameter goes up the surface speed does too. If the RPM must go down to maintain relative SFM, the feed rate may not compensate to make up for the loss in RPM. Besides the fact that you are also taking more material out to make the same part. It sure wouldn't hurt to try a 1/2" 4flute just to see how hard you can push it.

I do not think a mist coolant to be thick enough for cutting steel or carry away enough heat to be very effective if you expect better efficiency.

DC
__________________
Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 04-03-2006, 05:13 PM
dertsap's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 3,668
dertsap is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

http://www.hanita.com/us/HAN03040B-Varimill.pdf

check these out they will by far out perform most endmills out there , we use them on some ugly materials and they hold their own ,
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361