![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
This sounds too much like a tomatoe, tamatoe kinda thing. As long as you can discuss the concept in equal terms, why should it matter if one persons jargon is written in stone. There are many names for specific operations to which most people can be flexible enough to figure out as long as it is communicated well. Language barriers are the toughest situations to get by. DC
__________________ Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I think he is talking about tool change time. What I have been told is it is the time from when the tool leaves the workpiece, to the time the new tool has been accelerated to max rpm and is at the workpiece.
__________________ If you try to make everything idiot proof, someone will just breed a better idiot! |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Yes, it is a tool change term. The lower the "chip to chip" time, the faster the tool change. When considering all factors in a machine purchase, "chip to chip" time is not one of the more important factors unless you are running production jobs with a lot of tool changes. For the average "one off" application, this is seldom a value worth worrying about. Dan
__________________ (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
Anything in between is "time" no matter what other wasted motion happens to get there? I can just see marketing people claim a faster time if they start it from some other point. Like not including the retract at feed rate to the clearance plane before a rapid as "not part of the tool change time" Heheh! It makes me very happy I don't have to worry about such minute details. DC
__________________ Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Actually, what lakeside said was pretty much what I meant. In my environment, we have about a 40 second cycle time for one part, with 2 to 4 tool changes each cycle. It runs 24 hours a day, 5 to 7 days a week. Our tool change time is about 2 seconds (chip to chip), and that adds up.
__________________ If you try to make everything idiot proof, someone will just breed a better idiot! |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| I used to do some die cast parts that were run in like 10seconds machining and about 12 seconds tool changing! So chip to chip time is very crittical when your doing real High volume low cycle time parts. But we were using HAAS and the chip to chip on most mid to low end machines is high like 3-4 seconds (probably a generous guess)
__________________ thanks Michael T. "If you don't stand for something, chances are, you'll fall for anything!" |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| The regular Haas machines have a chip to chip time of 3.6 sec and I believe the Super Speed Haas machines are at 2.2 sec (which is damn fast when you watch it) Of course these numbers are assuming you have a side mount tool changer with the next tool staged and ready to go. If you have an umbrella style it will be longer as you have to release the tool and then index to the next one, and if the tool you are changing to is not right next to the empty pocket then it takes even longer. This is why in the new multitask machines you are seeing tools that can mill and turn and drill all in one tool as it skips tool changes (just a spindle orient, which you have to do in a regular tool change too) I wouldn't mind having a new Mori seki multi tasker so I could use tools like that but the $250,000 plus price tag kinda scares ya JP |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| We have Kira (anyone ever heard of them?), we are looking at brother for the next round though. Both have around .7 - .8 tool to tool, 2 chip to chip (and 50000 to 60000 mm/min rapids). We are drilling/tapping die cast.
__________________ If you try to make everything idiot proof, someone will just breed a better idiot! |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |