![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
This is my first post on CNC Zone so go ahead, make the newbie cracks. I've already done the search and not come up with the answers I'm looking for, so here we go! Setup info first: I have a Proto-Trac 1745S that I've been turning 304 Stainless high misalignment spacers with. The setup I've had the most success with turning the 304 is using Dorian VNMG-432-EG-DP25 inserts, turning the stock at 660 rpm, taking .015" @ 12.5 ipm passes for roughing, .005" @5.0 ipm finishing. I'm using one of Milicron's coolants. (forget which one, sorry - it works great on aluminum!) Most of the stock I'm cutting is between .625" and 1.250" in diam. I have a nice surface finish, but this setup's hard on my tooling. I get about four or five pieces per cutting edge of the inserts before I start loosing tolerance. I also end up having a rolled edge on what should be a sharp point on the spacers. Right now I'm just going back and facing off the little rolled edge with a cutoff tool, but is there a way to avoid this or is it just the nature of the 304? I'm getting stringers, not chips (once again - is this the nature of stainless?), they're generally slightly discolored to just starting to turn bluish. I've produced brown chips with a couple setups and it's not pretty... (too fast spindle speed and/or feed rates, right?)I've played with speeds from 1100 rpm to 400 and feeds from to 5.0 ipm to 20.0 with cuts from .005" up to .025". I can't get tool life! I'm guessing it's probably my choice of insert more than anything - my local tool supplier's been a bit of a help, but hasn't nailed it for me. Can someone give me some guidelines to start with? Insert, speeds/feeds and cut depth would be a great help. I'm also getting ready to turn some 4130 and/or 4140 (not sure which one yet - gotta go do some more materials research). Biggest diam. will be about 6", smallest diam will be about 1". On the few occasions that I have turned 4130 bar (1.250"), I end up with a torn surface instead of a nice smooth machined surface. I've run various speeds & feeds, but always seem to end up with similar results. So how about it? Guide lines on speeds, feeds and depth of cut for the chromoly? Does anyone know of a general chart (web site?) that would show the basics for me? Speeds/feeds/cut rates for different materials. I know it would be more of a guide line to start with, but so far I've been a trial and error operator, so more info would be great. (and probably less expensive!) Thanks in advance. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Turning 304 SS is quite different than 4140. It largely has to do with insert coatings. The correct coating is absolutely necessary to get good insert life with 304SS. The material will weld itself to the wrong coating and begin to pull pieces off the cutting edge, commonly known as the built up edge phenomena. So consult your tooling catalogues as to suitable coatings for turning the 304. The insert shape also has a lot to do with good chip flow. If the chip is piling up on the tool, such as it often the case with VNMG, it will wreck the tool. The VNMG is a negative rake insert, and does not have a positive rake chipbreaker to promote good flow in stainless cutting. I don't know of any insert that does a good job of short-chipping 304, because those that do, force the chip to break on the side of the insert and this causes crating on the side of the insert. Personally, I like to use Kennametal/Hertel Fix_perfect style inserts for turning 304SS. This unusual shape of tool (eight sided on edge) will roll the chip into a smooth spiral "cable" that may break between 3 to 12" in length. But, nice to handle, and they will fall down in the chip pan. I usually rough at about .05 to .1" DOC and .005"/rev feedrate with this tool. Surface speed, I keep down to about 300 fpm, as the heat buildup at the tip can be extreme with stainless. I use lots of flood coolant, too. Iscar Cutgrip will also do an excellent job in 304SS. These also roll the chip up into a spiral cable. The correct coating is still mandatory for good insert life. Turning C4140, use CNMG's to rough and finish with. There's lots of good grades and coatings that will handle it, and this is an economical insert shape to buy. Use the VNMG sparingly, it cannot handle much "plunge and turn", and should only be used where a tiny profiling feature demands it.
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Definatly use a positive cutter like HuFlungDung posted. You need to keep the insert engaged in 304 & always take a chip. I have had a lot of luck with wnmg inserts tin coated for stainless. I have machined a lot of inconel, stainless, precipitation hardened alloy 286 etc. in the past & it is not fun. Letting up on the feed with light cuts to prolong tool life can ruin an insert quickly. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| There's an interesting discussion about insert styles here (especially VNMG). http://www.cnczone.com/ub...;f=13;t=002020
__________________ Software For Metalworking http://closetolerancesoftware.com |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| K-Fab First problem I see is that your talking about RPMs and IPM, I guess we can take a guess the inches per tooth based on the stated RPMs but running 660 rpms on stock from .625 to 1.25 inches in diameter is a big difference. First thing to do is start thinking in surface footage, RPMs mean nothing, your cutter doesn't care what RPMs the stock is turning, it cares about the linear velocity in which it is going through the stock. Same thing for the IPM, that doesn't matter, what matters is chip load, as in .005 per tooth or in the case of a lathe per rev. I'll agree with most of whats been said, 304 sucks, it does not like to break chips. I've been intermitantly running a losing job on the lathe in 304, and I cannot get the chips to break(I can, but insert life suffers tremendously), I'm getting only about 70 pounds of stringy fluffy chips per barrel. I've found that a rather positive insert works best for tool life. I would toss the V series insert, rather weak, check out the thread in one of the posts above. As for the 4140, if your getting a torn finish, then its probably annealed or what McMaster Carr calls prehard, 'may be up to 35C' but is always in the 26 range(not quite hard enough). In that case, let it smear all it wants on your roughing cuts, then let it rip(high surface feet) for a finish. A negative insert will also lead to a torn finish. I've found that turning the coolant off will usually result in a nicer finish cut on annealed 4140/30 and mild steels. For these kind of finish cuts you will want a harder not tougher insert or maybe even a cermet. |
|
#8
| ||||||
| ||||||
The pieces I turn start out at either 1.000" diam and get machined down to .625" min. (in certain places, larger in others) or they start out at 1.125" and get turned down to .750". I have to find a spindle speed that covers the range. Once I hit the run button, it's step away and let the machine spit out the part. If I can find a happy medium, that would be good. I also understand/agree with the feed per rev. I've done some calculations to determine the feed needed, but with the (obviously wrong) inserts I've been using, the finish I was getting with the numbers that I had - well... hence the experimenting with different spindle speeds and feeds. Once again, my original post was looking for the basic starting points and then I'll tune to my machine. Heck, if someone's kind enough to give me surface speed, feed/rev and the insert I need for turning 304, that would be wonderful!! My original decision (wrong!) to use the VNMG was based on the profile of the pieces I am making. The diamond shape they offer allows me to profile my part with only one tool, get the 90 degree shoulder I need and cut the radius required for the ball joint to clear the body of the spacer. (see pic below)
As I've discovered, 304's a STRANGE animal to work with - especially when you're used to Al... I'm just trying to learn the basics of the stuff. I've been playing with a mill and lathe for quite a while now - totally self taught, btw. I've been trying to apply the proper formulae and such, but when you miss the boat entirely (wrong tool, insert, what have you), well, the math doesn't necessarily do much good. Trial by fire has been a damn good teacher, but sometimes it's a and you have to go and get help. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
I have found when material tears out on the finish, it is often due to the material welding itself to the cutting edge and there for becoming the new cutting edge, all be it a poor one at that. Wax cutting wax so to speak. Sulfer based cutting oil has worked OK for me in this regard, but it does not always relieve 100% of the problem. Inserts are nice, but I would rather grind and hone my own edge for PIA materials that work harden so easily. DC
__________________ Learn cause and effect through experience. Mastering those relationships is the "Common Sense" ability within the art of any trade. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| K-Fab, you asked for a starting point in 304, I'm just taking an educated guess. You don't have constant surface speed, so I would start out at about 500-550 SFM based on your maximum diameter. Then, since your running a fairly long skinny part, feed of maybe .008-.012 per rev, DOC of .015 to .030 depending on what kind of deflection your getting. On that same note, since your not really hogging, you could probably get away with VN insert, though I would make sure to get my hands on an insert that had a good positive chipbreaker, maybe 15 degrees, to overcome the -5 degrees in the toolholder, also make sure that you get an insert with no T-land. This should make for a nice low force cut that will keep the deflection down on your smallish parts. I guearantee you will get stringers from this, but sometimes it unavoidable. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |