CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking > General Metalwork Discussion


General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 07-19-2010, 03:33 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 169
eliot15 is on a distinguished road
Chamfer calculation

I'm trying to figure out how to calculate the 'Z-depth' value on say a G73 canned cycle for a .75" bolt hole. Lets use a chamfer diameter of 1.5".

If I were doing a 90 degree chamfer, I'd just bring my counter sink down till it touches in my bolt hole, take that depth (say -.123) and add it to (1.5 - .75) /2. So we get .375 + .123 = .498. So my G73 Z address value would be Z-.498, plus a little tolerance.

How do I do the same sort of calculation with an 82.5 degree counter sink?

Any help much appreciated.

e
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 07-19-2010, 04:59 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 355
Eurisko is on a distinguished road

That requires a little trigonometry.

First, divide 82.5 by 2, then find the tangent of that angle:

82.5 / 2 = 41.25

tan(41.25) = .8770 ( to 4 decimal places )

Take the diameter of the required chamfer, subtract the hole size, divide by 2, then divide by .8770

for example, your 1.500 chamfer would be :

(1.500-.750) / 2 / .8770 = .4276 ( to 4 decimal places)

This is the amount you would feed in Z with the chamfer tool just touching the hole.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. - Will Rogers
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 07-19-2010, 07:03 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 169
eliot15 is on a distinguished road

Thanks a million!

This is the amount you would feed in Z with the chamfer tool just touching the hole.
Just to be sure I undestand, I'm using an indexable countersink. I'm assuming I would have to bring the tool down to part zero, then drop the countersink into the hole until the inserts touch the sides of the hole, then add that distance to .4276 in the eample above.

Here are the numbers I actually worked with today:

My countersink inserts touched at Z-.168.

Chamfer (1.38) - Hole (.755) / 2 = .3125.

.168 + .3125 = .488.

So I initially set my Z-depth to Z-.488. That gave me a chamfer diameter of about 1.32. I finally got the chamfer diameter I wanted by increasing my Z-depth to about .538.

So, using trig:

(1.38-.755) / 2 / .8770 = 0.3563( to 4 decimal places)

Adding .168 to 0.3563 = 0.5243, which gets me just about to .538.

I wasn't sure if your remark:

This is the amount you would feed in Z with the chamfer tool just touching the hole.
was assuming that .168 was added in or not. Just wanted to be clear. I need a Z depth of about -.540 to get the 1.38 chamfer.

Is that all correct??

Thanks for your time.

e
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 07-19-2010, 08:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 355
Eurisko is on a distinguished road

I think you've got it. Yes, you would have to add the .168 (Z position with chamfer touching hole) to the trig calculation to get the final Z value.

It could be that the chamfer angle isn't exactly 82.5 degrees, that would explain why a little more depth was needed. Also, a chamfer diameter is tough to measure exactly. That throws another variable into the mix. Add tool pressure & flexing, and the numbers make sense.
__________________
Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. - Will Rogers

Last edited by Eurisko; 07-19-2010 at 08:47 PM. Reason: clarity
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 07-19-2010, 08:55 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 169
eliot15 is on a distinguished road

Great. Thanks again for that. I'll be using it constantly.

Also, .168 + .3125 doesn't = .488. My bad. It equals 0.4805. I threw in about .008 to shoot for the middle of tolerance.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2D chamfer jcnewbie Mastercam 5 10-18-2009 11:06 PM
Grinding a chamfer? pp-TG General Metalwork Discussion 5 02-28-2008 05:33 PM
Chamfer CharlesM479 Solidworks 3 04-11-2007 11:13 PM
Trying to chamfer some letters justCNCit Rhino 3D 29 02-08-2007 02:41 AM
Chamfer on surface Beaker Mastercam 5 11-15-2006 04:32 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361