![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| General Metalwork Discussion Discuss everything relating to metal work. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I'm trying to figure out how to calculate the 'Z-depth' value on say a G73 canned cycle for a .75" bolt hole. Lets use a chamfer diameter of 1.5". If I were doing a 90 degree chamfer, I'd just bring my counter sink down till it touches in my bolt hole, take that depth (say -.123) and add it to (1.5 - .75) /2. So we get .375 + .123 = .498. So my G73 Z address value would be Z-.498, plus a little tolerance. How do I do the same sort of calculation with an 82.5 degree counter sink? Any help much appreciated. e |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| That requires a little trigonometry. First, divide 82.5 by 2, then find the tangent of that angle: 82.5 / 2 = 41.25 tan(41.25) = .8770 ( to 4 decimal places ) Take the diameter of the required chamfer, subtract the hole size, divide by 2, then divide by .8770 for example, your 1.500 chamfer would be : (1.500-.750) / 2 / .8770 = .4276 ( to 4 decimal places) This is the amount you would feed in Z with the chamfer tool just touching the hole.
__________________ Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. - Will Rogers |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Thanks a million!
Here are the numbers I actually worked with today: My countersink inserts touched at Z-.168. Chamfer (1.38) - Hole (.755) / 2 = .3125. .168 + .3125 = .488. So I initially set my Z-depth to Z-.488. That gave me a chamfer diameter of about 1.32. I finally got the chamfer diameter I wanted by increasing my Z-depth to about .538. So, using trig: (1.38-.755) / 2 / .8770 = 0.3563( to 4 decimal places) Adding .168 to 0.3563 = 0.5243, which gets me just about to .538. I wasn't sure if your remark:
Is that all correct?? Thanks for your time. e |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I think you've got it. Yes, you would have to add the .168 (Z position with chamfer touching hole) to the trig calculation to get the final Z value. It could be that the chamfer angle isn't exactly 82.5 degrees, that would explain why a little more depth was needed. Also, a chamfer diameter is tough to measure exactly. That throws another variable into the mix. Add tool pressure & flexing, and the numbers make sense.
__________________ Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. - Will Rogers Last edited by Eurisko; 07-19-2010 at 08:47 PM. Reason: clarity |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2D chamfer | jcnewbie | Mastercam | 5 | 10-18-2009 11:06 PM |
| Grinding a chamfer? | pp-TG | General Metalwork Discussion | 5 | 02-28-2008 05:33 PM |
| Chamfer | CharlesM479 | Solidworks | 3 | 04-11-2007 11:13 PM |
| Trying to chamfer some letters | justCNCit | Rhino 3D | 29 | 02-08-2007 02:41 AM |
| Chamfer on surface | Beaker | Mastercam | 5 | 11-15-2006 04:32 AM |