CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > General Metal Working Machines


General Metal Working Machines General discussions of all metal working machines from drill presses to band-saws.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-12-2008, 04:43 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 4
protogregg is on a distinguished road
Seismic anchoring of CNC's

We just installed two Haas CNC's (VF-2, VF-3YT), and were told by the city that they need to be anchored to the floor for seismic purposes. The inspector told us that in a "seismic event" he feels these machines could "skip across the floor and crush someone against a wall". I think he is pushing for permit fees, but we can't really fight the city. Does anyone have any experience in anchoring these machines for this purpose? Do they need to be anchored for this reason? Please help if you can, as we can't even bed and use the machines until we figure this one out.

Thanks
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-12-2008, 05:28 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

I think they are stretching a point , I am in a seismically active area and have never heard of this. The inspector "feels" they could skip across the floor? You are correct about it being difficult to fight City Hall, it is also difficult to reason with idiots so you have a double whammy.

However, his 'skipping' across the floor is baloney and depending on how friendly the people who know about siesmic stuff are at your local university, if you have one, you could get data to validate or invalidate the skipping scenario. In a seismic event (I always thought they were called earthquakes) it is the ground that moves either horizontally or vertically, it can move fast and in the 1972 earthquake in Southern California (I think it was '72, it was the one that knocked down a Veteran's Hospital I think) accelerations of greater than 2 g's were recorded and similar values occurred during the Northridge quake. With these accelerations the ground slides sideways under things so it is the ground that is skipping around not the machine. But the ground does not move very far and this is where a university seismologist may be able to give some information. There will probably be records they can refer to to find the maximum lateral displacement that has taken place in prior quakes in your area. If the machine is further away from any walls than the maximum displacement ever observed no-one is going to get crushed between the machine and the wall. The wall might fall down and crush the person but that is a different matter.

However, having bored you with a bunch of stuff I will say what I would probably do because it is always a losing thing dealing with idiots. Did your machines arrive on shipping pallets? There are bent metal straps that are held on the levelling screws and bolted to the pallet. I would simply level the machine then install these metal straps in much the same manner they where on the pallet but they will be bolted to concrete anchors in the floor. You can tell the inspector that they machine is secured even more firmly than it was for shipping because now these straps are secured in concrete not wood.
__________________
An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 02-12-2008, 05:46 PM
stevehuckss396's Avatar  
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 482
stevehuckss396 is on a distinguished road

Try getting in touch with one of the anchor manufacturer's like red head or something. Most times all seismic means is moving up in size or adding a few extra anchor's than a standard installation. Get a recommendation from a anchor manufacturer and the city will have a hard time disputing their expertise.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-13-2008, 12:29 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: United States
Age: 40
Posts: 24
jnsane84 is on a distinguished road

In my honest opinion I think if you had seismic activity to the magnitude that it would "skip" a 7000lb machine accross the floor, you would have far more to worry about than whether or not it will pin someone to a wall that is probably already fallen. Of course this a truely uneducated assumption since I have never experienced or lived in an area affected by seismic activity.

As for an answer to your question of anchoring, In the past we used Epoxy seated anchors for gantry's and extremely large equipment. If the inspector is that concerned with machines skipping accross the floor and crushing people I would invest the time and effort into using the Epoxy seated anchors. I included several links below that may help you out.



http://www.williamsform.com/Concrete...e_anchors.html

http://www.simpsonanchors.com/catalo...set/index.html

http://www.sierraanchors.com/Chemica...veAnchors.html
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 02-13-2008, 12:33 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Contact Unisorb - http://www.unisorb.com/

These guys have lots of logical solutions to machine isolation and anchoring that might make the butthead inspectors arguement go away.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 02-13-2008, 12:40 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,565
Geof will become famous soon enough

Part of the problem of dealing with an Inspector who comes up with the 'skipping' machine idea is that there is a little element of possibility in it.

The probability is another matter; you would need the machine close enough to the wall, and a person between the wall and the machine, and the ground movement would have to be in the correct direction, and the rate at which the ground moved would need to be fast enough that the floor slid sideways under the machine, and the wall would have to be anchored much more firmly than the machine or it would just get left behind by the ground moving and the machine and wall would not get closer.

But, pigs might fly under the correct conditions, so maybe it could happen. But I still think it is an asinine worry, however, telling the Inspector he is a brainless twit may not be productive.
__________________
An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-13-2008, 06:30 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Age: 48
Posts: 617
cam1 is on a distinguished road

Hi:
Just my 2 cents worth. I routinely work with all the different types of inspectors(good cop, bad cop,blocker etc.), It's easier to move past this by "keeping him happy". This basically means showing him what you intend on doing to meet the guidline(s). It's OK to ask for the code he is citing under the pretense that you would like to make sure to "conform". The city has alot more resources to fight you. It may seem unreasonable, and I agree, however it won't cost much to comply, certainly cheaper than ticking him off, and being prevented from running the machines.

cheers
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 03-10-2008, 11:29 PM
apache405's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 197
apache405 is on a distinguished road

hmmm.... I hate inspectors who do that. I think that the idea of using the shipping anchor points is a good bet.

The one problem with drilling anchors into the floor is the depth of your floor. I was bolting a 500lb rack of audio gear to the floor of a high school press box and I thought the floor was 6" inches thick, (it was 4" thick), and I drilled clear through the floor. Also, if you are leasing or renting your shop space, your landlord may have something to say about you drilling the floor up, especially if you building is on a slab foundation.

Good luck with your quagmire of city inspections!
__________________
-Jeff
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too many CNC's...how to choose?? peter27 Commercial CNC Wood Routers 3 03-05-2011 08:23 AM
Does anyone backup their CNC's PC hard drive? WayneHill General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) 7 08-22-2010 09:14 PM
WTB - Used CNC's Charlie Gimble Canadian Club House 2 10-19-2008 12:10 PM
new guy questions on types of homebuilt cnc's Goldhunter_2 Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 10 06-24-2005 01:10 PM
Textile industry cnc's Konstantin CNCzone Club House 7 04-02-2004 07:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361