CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > General Metal Working Machines


General Metal Working Machines General discussions of all metal working machines from drill presses to band-saws.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 05-24-2007, 10:26 PM
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 12
tom bryant is on a distinguished road
Red face circular interpolation description

Hello,
I have a supermax 40 mill w/ an Anilam crusader M control. I'm having a problem with getting a round bore using Anilams canned cycle. The program calls out the center of the bore X0Y0 and drops z to depth then feeds out at about a 30 degee angle to about 1 o'clock then goes counter clockwise around the hole past 1 o'clock to about 11 o'clock then back to center. The
resulting hole because of the extra overlap makes the hole out of tolerance. Is there someone out there that has run this control and can tell me if there is a different way to program this? I'm not that great on the mill yet I've been programming cnc lathes for about 23 years and have puchased three of these supermax's about a year ago. What does the term "interpolate" mean in lamens terms. Is it possible to hold .0007 in a bore or should I go back to the boring head? THANKS
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 05-24-2007, 11:15 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 355
Eurisko is on a distinguished road

Interpolation, in machining terms, is generating a path that connects data points. Close to the ideal path, but constrained by the control limits.

The proper way to cut a circle is to ramp into the circle (using a smaller radius), cut 360 degrees at the proper radius, then ramp out (using a smaller radius).

This ensures that there is no overlap.

Unfortunately, it would take an EXTREMELY accurate machine to hold .0007 tolerance interpolating a bore. If the machine itself is accurate to .0002 positioning, you've already used up over half of your tolerance!

When you add in other factors such as tool wear and deflection, material hardness, temperature, etc., you're really pushing the limit.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 05-24-2007, 11:17 PM
Mazaholic's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Age: 51
Posts: 217
Mazaholic is on a distinguished road

Check the backlash on the machine.
We have three supermaxes..one of them looses about .02 in 6 inches.
.0007 i'd probably use a good boring head.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 05-25-2007, 11:26 PM
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 12
tom bryant is on a distinguished road

Mazaholic,
Does any of your machines have anilam controls on them. Also how do you tell if you have linear scales on a machine. My "programing manual " says I have backlash compensation. Is that the same as lost motion?
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 05-26-2007, 09:44 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Using a slow feedrate on a light cut allows the cutter to do its very best at removing all the material that it can. Thus, there is nothing left to be cut on a 'spring pass'. If you still recut when going over the same path twice, then your tool is not sharp enough, the amount to finish was excessive, or your feedrate was too high.

When attempting to interpolate a bore to roundness, use a sharp tool reserved for the finish cut. Use a seperate profiling operation (with tool radius compensation) to take the finish cut, rather than a machine cycle. Use the machine cycles to rough and semi-finish with, that is what they are for.

My suggestion is that you reserve maybe .002" for a finish cut. Tool deflection during heavier cuts will easily cause the 'overcut' effect in any areas where the tool traverses twice (as in your overlap zone).

Slow the feed down considerably when attempting to interpolate bores very accurately. I found I could get very good interpolated roundness on my Haas if interpolating at about 10 ipm (in aluminum)ie, approx .0002 variation.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 05-26-2007, 10:29 AM
Mitsui Seiki's Avatar  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 464
Mitsui Seiki is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Eurisko View Post
The proper way to cut a circle is to ramp into the circle (using a smaller radius), cut 360 degrees at the proper radius, then ramp out (using a smaller radius).

This ensures that there is no overlap.
This is what it can look like:

g0g90g54x0y0
g1z-10f100
g2x0y12.5i0j6.25f200
i0j-25
x0y0i0j-6.25
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 05-26-2007, 01:51 PM
Mazaholic's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Age: 51
Posts: 217
Mazaholic is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by tom bryant View Post
Mazaholic,
Does any of your machines have anilam controls on them. Also how do you tell if you have linear scales on a machine. My "programing manual " says I have backlash compensation. Is that the same as lost motion?

Ours are Fanuc.
I just recomended a backlash check so you can remove it from your list of possible problems.
.0007 will not allow for much if any backlash.
Backlash is the total amount of (for lack of a better word) slop in your leadscrews.
Your machine probably already has some factory compensation for it but the amount will change due to wear and tear.
Just make sure you use a quality indicator that reads at least .0001 increments,you adjustment will only be as good as the indicator.
Interpolation with small tollerances can be a pain if your backlash isn't adjusted properly since your using two axis....you can imagine it wouldn't take much to create a square hole.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mazak Mill Circular Interpolation problem DublJ Mazak, Mitsubishi, Mazatrol 2 02-13-2007 11:13 AM
Nano Interpolation vs 104/D TDavid Fadal 7 03-30-2006 05:36 PM
question about circular interpolation warpedmephisto Benchtop Machines 13 03-22-2006 04:51 PM
circular interpolation of small deep holes rchprks General Metalwork Discussion 9 11-25-2005 08:37 PM
interpolation rimcanyon General Electronics Discussion 9 04-08-2004 01:10 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:56 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361