Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 16

Thread: The most rigid 4-5 axis design

  1. #1
    Registered Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    129
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Question The most rigid 4-5 axis design

    Guys,

    Eventually I would like to build a 5 axis CNC machine to mill Al alloys but a 4-axis will do for my purposes for now. I am aiming for maximum rigidity in the design with, of course, the largest working volume. Prob go for open loop stepper control.

    My Q is what is the most rigid type of design?
    This site has the most common design types;
    http://engraving.majosoft.com/html/body_choice.html

    But this is what I think is the best design;
    http://69.13.114.130/techspex/millin...illing_id=4041


    Thanks!!


  2. #2
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Can't see your second link.

    I think the most rigid design is like a planer mill where the table moves under a fixed bridge structure - the Y and Z and all other axis are mounted to the bridge. This style take up more room, but has the ability to be made more rigid than a moving column in my opinion.

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  3. #3
    Registered Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    129
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Thanks for the reply.

    I'll try the link again;
    http://69.13.114.130/techspex/millin...illing_id=4041

    This is the Hermle c40U
    Some have described this as "trunion" type.

    Any one else care to comment?


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    26
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0


  • #5
    Registered Zathras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    129
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Thanks for the input and correct links guys.

    mxtras:

    I would have put it second on my list. Fair enough. You'd know better than me.
    You mean like the pic?;
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails The most rigid 4-5 axis design-getimage.jpg  


  • #6
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I was refering to a bridge mill like this:
    http://www.xyzmachinetools.com/pages/money.html

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  • #7
    Registered Evodyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    518
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Question

    Hi guys! This has been on my mind lately too. I've pretty much decided to try this (all comments welcome).

    Sliding table under a fixed gantry. The table either is or incorporates a flat (horizontal) rotary table. The entire Y-axis raises and lowers as a Z axis. This is to combat the long moment arm from a conventional Z-axis with a rotating router. The router/spindle would rotate 180 degrees relative to Z so that the cutting tool can move from horizontal along the X axis to vertical and on around to pointing back along the X axis again.

    Anyone see any flaws or weaknesses?

    Evo


  • #8
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    hh
    Posts
    813
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0


    Here's my gantry mill I'm building; it's taken a back seat while I forge ahead on my new lathe; but it is quite a bit more on than this pic
    If someone needs a more updated photo I'll shoot one


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    hh
    Posts
    813
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Evodyne
    The entire Y-axis raises and lowers as a Z axis.

    Evo
    Needs matched ballscrews and drive systems to work right and even then it's tough to make sure moton is matched end to end in Z


  • #10
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Evodyne -

    I see no flaws with your logic. I used to run a massive Cincinnati that was configured the same way (with the exception of the pivoting head). I think this layout offers numerous advantages over a gantry - rigidity being one (for a bridge mill in general).

    I like the simplicity of Steve's design. I am envious!

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    hh
    Posts
    813
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    more details of the mill; with the Z axis now


    rails are THK RSR25mm for Y and Z SR25 for X
    Travels are 21.375" X 14" Y 9.5 Z


  • #12
    Gold Member mxtras's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,810
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Nice and clean work, steve. I really like your work.

    Scott
    Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.


  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.