![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| General Electronics Discussion Discuss basic electronics, power supplies and anything else electronic related here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| From what I've read, P-Channel devices are slower, have higher "on" resistance and are more expensive than N-Channel devices. But using a P & N channel combination would surely make a H-bridge much simpler (no high-side drivers, no bootstrapping limitations, no need for locked antiphase driving). I had a look at a pair of devices IRF1010N & IRF4905 (both around $2.00). Device, Drain-Source Voltage, Drain-Source Current, Drain-Source On-Resistance, Gate-Source Charge, Rise Time, Fall Time [N-Channel IRF1010N] 55V 85A 11mΩ 32nC 76nS 48nS [P-Channel IRF4905] -55V 74A 20mΩ 19nC 99nS 96nS Would a H-bridge design with these two really be that bad? A P-Channel device at lower voltages (55V) has reasonable On-Resistance (although this triples @100V, and it 7 times greater @150V). |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Ah the evil P channel.. actually an interesting aspect of the specs You have published is that the stored charge ( remember you got to get rid of this charge to change the state of the FET ) is actually lower in case of P channel device. I think it might be an idea go back to the manufacturers data sheets and check out the TEST CIRCUIT and practicability of the test circuit to ascertain just how relevant the rise time specs are. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| If your really into cost savings then an Nchannel is better, but a Pchannel can make a simpler H bridge with just a pull down resistor drive circuit, no high side driver needed. I made a stepper drive for 10 years (in 90's) with a p-channel top end and they were very reliable, but ran a bit hotter than if it was Nchannel. A Pchannel can make a simpler more reliable circuit, because mosfet drivers fail quite easily when stressed. I drove the top pchannels with a ULN2003 and a simple resistor divider. I used IRF520 and IRF9520 mosfets. btw ,When running high voltage, a slower turn-on can be better Larry K
__________________ Manufacturer of CNC routers and Viper Servo Drives www.LarkenCNC.com and www.Viperservo.com |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| We use P-channel in openservo.com open source servo. I think IRF mosfets were used in one of the hardware iterations. You might want to take a gander over there and look at the schematics. The main cpu is Atmel Atmega168. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
$5 each.. your kidding right ?? I pay 0.35 each
__________________ Manufacturer of CNC routers and Viper Servo Drives www.LarkenCNC.com and www.Viperservo.com |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
![]() What do you use a thousand of them for? (I can crack Canadian jokes...I am Canadian. hehe) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
IR have some good app notes on using these chips.. check 'em out.. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
|
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
Its written right at the bottom of this message. ![]()
I drive IRFP4232's (pretty big mosfets) with 2104's
__________________ Manufacturer of CNC routers and Viper Servo Drives www.LarkenCNC.com and www.Viperservo.com |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Real World Load Test, Help. | Cartierusm | General Metal Working Machines | 6 | 04-02-2009 01:08 PM |
| Need Help!- How evil is a P-Channel MOSFET in the real world? | CrazyIvan | Open Source Controller Boards | 0 | 03-25-2009 01:48 AM |
| use of G10 in the real world. | bookwurm99 | G-Code Programing | 20 | 12-10-2007 02:43 PM |
| 3D modelling in the real world | ksealey | WoodWorking | 2 | 11-30-2007 01:06 AM |
| Any real world experience with Camsoft & Steppers | mbam | CamSoft Products | 20 | 06-23-2004 10:59 AM |