CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > General Electronics Discussion


General Electronics Discussion Discuss basic electronics, power supplies and anything else electronic related here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 02:26 PM
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: finland
Posts: 262
andy55 is on a distinguished road
do I need PFC ?

hi electronics gurus,

I'm planning a servo system based on the surpluscenter sanyo denki servos. will use three 400W servos for axes and one 1kW servo for spindle.
i.e. 2.2 kW of power together (in addition I suspect that the quoted wattage of the servos is the mechanical output and not the electrical input, so the power requirement is even higher...)

A simple "transformer+diode bridge+filter caps" would be my first thought, but what about PFC ?
The psu will be hooked up to 4x PWM servodrives that drive the inductive motor coils.

If I use the simple design without pfc, by how much would it be reasonable to oversize the psu ?
I probably need to buy two isolation transformers for this, is it OK to wire the secondaries in parallell (identical transformers)?

what about EMI or disturbing the local electricity network in general. do I need RF filters on the primary lines ?

what's a reasonable maximum power to hook up to normal single phase electricity ? (I think I have 16A fuses on the 230VAC mains here...)

thanks for any answers,
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 01-03-2006, 03:58 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,540
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by andy55
hi electronics gurus,

A simple "transformer+diode bridge+filter caps" would be my first thought, but what about PFC ?
The psu will be hooked up to 4x PWM servodrives that drive the inductive motor coils.

If I use the simple design without pfc, by how much would it be reasonable to oversize the psu ?
I probably need to buy two isolation transformers for this, is it OK to wire the secondaries in parallel (identical transformers)?

what about EMI or disturbing the local electricity network in general. do I need RF filters on the primary lines ?

what's a reasonable maximum power to hook up to normal single phase electricity ? (I think I have 16A fuses on the 230VAC mains here...)

thanks for any answers,
What makes you to think that you would need PFC? A 'Simple' ps is all that is needed, Transformer bridge and capacitors.
Your power supplier is only going to see the transformer load, there should not be a any need for PFC.
The secondary is feeding a capacitor/inductor load and which is isolated by means of the transformer, power transformers have inherently good high frequency reflected suppresion, also there is a large capacitor bank between your load and the TXR secondary..
It is possible to wire transformers in parallel, providing a they are a close match, they must be phase correctly, however.
You can usually hook up any load that is within your capacity of your supply .
You could check into the possibility of larger fusing capability for your panel.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 03:52 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: finland
Posts: 262
andy55 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Al_The_Man
What makes you to think that you would need PFC? A 'Simple' ps is all that is needed, Transformer bridge and capacitors.
Your power supplier is only going to see the transformer load, there should not be a any need for PFC.
The secondary is feeding a capacitor/inductor load and which is isolated by means of the transformer, power transformers have inherently good high frequency reflected suppresion, also there is a large capacitor bank between your load and the TXR secondary..
It is possible to wire transformers in parallel, providing a they are a close match, they must be phase correctly, however.
You can usually hook up any load that is within your capacity of your supply .
You could check into the possibility of larger fusing capability for your panel.
Al.
thanks for these answers.
A PF of less than one means that I have to oversize the transformer by 1/PF which will cost more...
Also, with ever more stringent regulations if I put some homemade 2kW device on the network I might get the power company guys knocking on my door real soon...

I found cheap AC2DC PFC units for sale on ebay but they all produce around 380VDC or so (some kind of industry standard?) and not the 150-200VDC I would need.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 03:03 PM
gar gar is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,498
gar is on a distinguished road

060104-1539 EST USA

andy55:

Power factor is basically defined for a sunusoidal voltage and current with no harmonic content. How do you, or your power company, define power factor when the voltage is sinusoidal and the load current is not?

Now lets consider a transformer with a bridge rectifier and capacitor input filter on the secondary.

With the secondary disconnected the primary current will have a substantial inductive component and this lightly loaded condition on the power company line will have a low power factor, but not much current relative to full load.

Next connect the secondary to the bridge and put a load on the dc output to fully load the transformer. What does the primary current look like? It still has the small magnetizing component of the transformer, but added to this is a peaked waveform from charging the filter capacitor. The peaks are in phase with the transformer primary voltage.

How do these peaked waveforms fit into your definition of power factor?

These peaks should be equally objectional to the power company, because they increase the RMS heating of distribution wires and transformers, as compared to a sine wave current load.

So how upset the power company will be is a function how they define power factor, or other criteria.

When transformers are designed for capacitor input filters some assumption is made about the current waveform and its RMS heating of the windings.

A criteria that Signal Transformer uses for a full-wave bridge rectifier capacitor input filter is:

Maximum DC output volt-amperes is equal to AC volt-ampere rating of the transformer. This is obviously ambient temperature dependent.

.

Last edited by gar; 01-04-2006 at 03:29 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 03:14 PM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 456
JRoque is on a distinguished road

Hello. You're probably thinking about switched power supplies and not linear like the one you plan to use. As Al mentioned, the transformer windings, diodes and caps will likely damp any glitches resulting from the chopper drive. You can always add a filter network on the mains side if you're concerned with noise.

An efficient linear transformer (ie: toroidal) put very little load on the AC line by themselves. Also, even when firing all motors, you'll notice that total load will be far less than the full rated printed on the motor - thanks to the PWM drives.

JR
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 04:47 PM
gar gar is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,498
gar is on a distinguished road

060104-1743 EST USA

JRoque:

What do you mean by "load" is it power or current?

.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 06:30 PM
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 456
JRoque is on a distinguished road

Hello Gar, I mean Watts consumed. Same as you used it in "...this lightly loaded condition". BTW, my comments were for Andy55's post - I didn't see your post before but it certainly explains things further.

JR
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 07:00 PM
gar gar is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,498
gar is on a distinguished road

060104-1940 EST USA

JRoque:

Consider a motor running under steady state conditions, meaning constant speed and torque, over a time interval of concern, Then averaged over this interval :

Mechanical power ouput of the motor will be less than the electrical power input to the motor.

Electrical input power to the motor will be less than the electrical input power to the chopper circuitry.

Electrical output power from the DC power supply will be less than the input power to the DC supply.

All these derive from the conservation of energy. Dominately all the losses as you go down thru this chain of elements are thermal. There may be some minor radiation losses.

The chopper circuit average input current will be less than the motor average current because you essentially have a step down circuit as most of these drivers are designed. But the average of the instantaneous input v * i will be greater than the average of the instantaneous output v * i .

.
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 01-04-2006, 09:30 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boalsburg PA
Posts: 844
unterhaus is on a distinguished road

Anytime current and voltage are not sinusoidal and in phase, the power factor is less than one. Linear power supplies also have non-sinusoidal current due to the filter capacitors. Power factor meters often have two readings, one is Displacement Power Factor, which is cos(phi) or the phase between the current and voltage, and Total Power Factor, which is the ratio of the total power to the RMS power. If you have a linear system as a load, these will be the same thing, but if there is a rectifier feeding filter capacitors, they never will be. Basically, the power company is going to hook one of these meters up to the line and say Total Power Factor is not one, fix it.

I really wonder how much the electric company is going to be able to notice these harmonics. I can't imagine my electric company caring too much about it. Do they really go around with power factor meters?

Last edited by unterhaus; 01-04-2006 at 09:49 PM.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361