CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Electronics > General Electronics Discussion


General Electronics Discussion Discuss basic electronics, power supplies and anything else electronic related here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 12:38 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
jiminy is on a distinguished road
Red face Toroid Question

Hi,
I would like to put together a power supply using my surplus toroid transformers.. I have 2 of these. They are 120V primary, 88 V Center tapped (44V) 15A , with a second secondary of 12V.

I want to keep things general so I can power 4 G320 Geckos. Should I use 1 or 2 of these transformers in my supply.. these are HEAVY units.. any suggestions? Can anyone suggest what size rectifier and Caps I should use?

The original Toroids are center tapped with only 1 wire .. I have carefully peeled back the outer plastic insulation around the secondary wires and see that there are 4 copper wires soldered to the single center tap cable coming out of the transformer.. Should I seperate the secondary at the tap point to produce two separate secondaries of 44 V? If so, how should I proceed? Two separate rectifiers and caps (1 for each of the new separate secondaries?).. is there a better way?

A lot of questions for you guys... hope someone can help!
thanks, Jim
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 01-02-2006, 01:07 PM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,540
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

You could parallel the two centre tap windings, you would have to separate every end and identify it with is companion other end and then phase everything before hooking up in parallel. for phasing, only connect the end of one winding with another and then measure the two open ends and there should be close to zero voltage, if it is double the expected voltage then use an alternative end of one winding and try again, when you get zero voltage, you can parallel both windings by then connecting the two ends that read zero voltage.
Clear as mud, I know!
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.

Last edited by Al_The_Man; 01-02-2006 at 03:58 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 06:57 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
jiminy is on a distinguished road
Thanks Al..

Al,
what do I gain by paralleling the two center tapped windings? Is this better than say running 2 gecko's off 1 center tap and 2 from the other?
What is your opinion of using these transformers for this purpose? I should be able to get 44x1.414 = approx. 58V from one half of the secondary winding... isn't that right?

thanks again,
Jim
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-02-2006, 07:57 PM
gar gar is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,498
gar is on a distinguished road

060102-2028 EST USA

jiminy:

You can use the transformer as is as a full-wave center tapped rectifier power supply.

I would make the center tap common (negative), use two diodes, one to each outer end of the transformer. You do not connect the outer ends of the transformer as this would short the secondary. To each outer transformer end connect a diode anode. Connect the two cathodes together. This gives you a full-wave rectified positive output at the cathode node relative to the transformer center tap.

This method slightly increases the power loss in the transformer vs a full-wave bridge. Your DC output with a capacitor input filter will be approximately the AC VA rating of the transformer. AC VA is 88 x 15 = 1320. The capacitor input filter DC output voltage is approximately 1.414 x 44 = 62 v. So the approximate continuous DC load current is 1320/62 = 21 Amps. Maybe derate this to 85% and you have 18 Amps. Possibly use a 40 Amp 200 V common cathode rectifier.

.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 02:12 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
jiminy is on a distinguished road
thanks Gar!

Wow! Never thought of that idea! That's the easiest solution.. no need to do surgery on the toroid! Why is the loss greater?
regards.Jim
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-03-2006, 07:42 AM
gar gar is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,498
gar is on a distinguished road

060103-0803 EST USA

jiminy:

The full-wave center tapped rectifier was the most common type in the vacuum tubes days where a transformer was used. In ACDC sets half-wave rectification directly from the line was used with no transformer.

In the full-wave center tapped rectifier each half of the secondary has a half-wave rectifier. For a sine wave no filter and a resistive load the average DC ouput current is 0.5 * 0.636 of the AC peak current for one half of the secondary. This is a more peaked waveform than a sine wave and thus the RMS current is higher.

When we look at a capacitor input filter on the rectifier output we get a very peaked current compared to a resistive load. Thus, this produces more heat in the transformer secondary than than a sine wave for the same average output current.

A full-wave bridge and a full-wave center tapped rectifier with the same capactive load have almost the same peak current on each half cycle. When the same amount of copper window is used in the transformer for the secondary, then the source resistance for the full-wave bridge is 1/2 that of the full-wave center tapped. This results in a somewhat higher peak current for the full-wave bridge, but the relative peakiness is worse for the full-wave center tapped circuit and its source resistance is higher as viewed on a half-wave basis.

You would need to run a temperature rise measurement in the transformer secondary to determine what actual derating should be applied.

.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:56 AM
Al_The_Man's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 16,540
Al_The_Man is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

One of the down sides with full wave centre tapped it is not as an efficient use of the transformer as a full wave bridge, as each half of the secondary is only used half the time.
You would need a transformer 1.4x larger when using full wave center tap over a full wave bridge for the same current capacity.
Al.
__________________
CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Machine Design.
“Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
Albert E.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361