CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > General CAM Discussion


General CAM Discussion Discuss CAD/CAM software and Design software methods here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #25   Ban this user!
Old 04-14-2006, 11:28 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 20
korntheuer is on a distinguished road

I had a deeper look into the file formats DXF, DWG, and STL. They are all
very similar. Convertion tools will not reduce the amount triangles in my
file. It all gives about the same size.

What I really need is this:

Soft that turns a wireframe ( or mesh ) into a solid. ger21 did this trick somehow.
After the convertion to a solid I can convert it into DXF, STL or whatever.
This way I end up with a small file that anybody can use.

Does anybody has any good sugestions for wireframe to solid converter
software?

Thanks,
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #26  
Old 04-14-2006, 11:38 AM
*Registered*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,628
lakeside is on a distinguished road

if rhino opened it would there 3d do the trick?
Reply With Quote

  #27  
Old 04-14-2006, 11:46 AM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,455
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

Originally Posted by korntheuer
Soft that turns a wireframe ( or mesh ) into a solid. ger21 did this trick somehow.
No, I didn't. MeshCAM reads the .dxf mesh and can create g-code from that. Like I said, just about any 3D CAM program shouldn't have any problems with it. MeshCAM only costs $150 and it reads it just fine.

Even if you could turn it into a solid, it won't make it any better, as it would just be a solid version of the triangulated mesh.

As Fyffe said, for 2.5D milling, this is not the best way to go about it. It would be much better to just do a 2D drawing and convert that to G-code. For 3D work, you're .dxf is no different than using an .stl file.
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #28   Ban this user!
Old 04-14-2006, 12:19 PM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 550
fyffe555 is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by ger21
I think what Fyffe is saying is that, sure, you can machine it, but will it be accurate? I don't know. I also didn't try to scale it.
Correct!...... now why didn't I just say that....

I've just spoken to a friend who had a part made by EMS. His problems with the parts where why I got involved to have a look. Cut a long story short he seems to suggest that EMS ships the job out to a machineshop and the shop can determine part of the machining process, and in some cases what dimensions or tolerances they might be produced to. In this case a plate was bent with a radius, the ems model file 2d dxf didn't include the bend radius which was apparently determined by the shop. When the parts where delivered they where different to a small degree from the 3d model displayed. Critical features where correct. No big problem really and he was happy but it seems certain elements normally included for a machinist can be left for the machinist to determine? If that's the case then anyone using an ems file as a source for gcode might have to make similar decisions and modify the dxf thats put into Ace converter, meshcam et al..

Andrew
Reply With Quote

  #29   Ban this user!
Old 04-14-2006, 01:23 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 20
korntheuer is on a distinguished road

Gerry,

The convertion to something else than wireframe IS important. I have here files
of several tens of megabytes containing all the small triangles and only
describing not too complicated objects. (I'm pretty certain no details are missing ;-) )
But the file size is totally impractical. A disk with some camphered holes gives 6 Mb.
Modifying anything in such a file is impossible...
I really would like to know how you made this small IGES file. First into gcode with
MeshCAM? And then what? Rhino? Sorry I don't have any experiance...

Thanks,
Reply With Quote

  #30  
Old 04-14-2006, 05:24 PM
ger21's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shelby Twp, MI....USA
Posts: 20,455
ger21 is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

If you want to convert just to decrease file size, .dwg format **should** be much smaller. Your Funnel went from 312KB to 96KB in .dwg format.

Modifying a 3D .dxf consiting of 3D faces (triangles) is a very difficult thing. I'd probably rather remodel it from scratch. Regardless of the file size.

If you use a program like MeshCAM, it only accepts .stl and .dxf, so you'll have to get used to the file size.

As for the IGES, Mike said he couldn't open it. Could you? I didn't check it. I just opened it in Rhino, and Save As, IGES. I don't have Rhino at home to check if it works.

Have you tried converting to an .stl? An .stl writes the triangle info in a much more compact format than .dxf, and should result in a smaller file size. I just checked, and the .stl was 85Kb, or about 25-30% the size of the .dxf
Attached Files
File Type: zip funnel.zip‎ (19.1 KB, 63 views)
__________________
Gerry

Mach3 2010 Screenset
http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #31  
Old 04-14-2006, 06:11 PM
*Registered*
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,628
lakeside is on a distinguished road

this is what i see and what data say X Y 137" Z 291"? also attached is a 3d dxf for tool path for another peice
Attached Files
File Type: zip kitty cat 6.zip‎ (712.8 KB, 64 views)

Last edited by lakeside; 04-14-2006 at 06:43 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #32   Ban this user!
Old 05-27-2010, 04:30 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 20
korntheuer is on a distinguished road

The Geocities site doesn't work anymore ( Geocities was closed down... )

So I moved the soft to a new "Geocities clone/archive" on:

http://www.geocities.ws/ems2obj/

It has been 4 years since I last used it. Does anybody know if it still works
with the newest version of emachineshop?
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361