CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > General CAM Discussion


General CAM Discussion Discuss CAD/CAM software and Design software methods here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #13   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2006, 07:15 PM
Dawson's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 16
Dawson is on a distinguished road

I use NX2 now. Started with V15 in 99. I got 1 week of training out at CadPo, and I've had others from my company go there because of the thorough job they do. The last time I had training was V18 when they drastically changed the manufacturing side, but most of the changes were for the better.

There are only a few modules I use in manufacturing to make pretty much any shape imaginable within the 3-4 axis environment:

Fixed Contour for planar milling and contours.
Cavity Mill to rough out our blocks.
Hole making.

That is all it takes to use this software. There is no reason at all to go picking through the ump-teen other choices since they are just fixed contour with preset options, or planar mill which boundary method covers. Once you get a few good templates setup it's not bad at all.
Reply With Quote

  #14   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2006, 08:17 PM
Cammotion's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 166
Cammotion is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Dawson
I use NX2 now. Started with V15 in 99. I got 1 week of training out at CadPo, and I've had others from my company go there because of the thorough job they do. The last time I had training was V18 when they drastically changed the manufacturing side, but most of the changes were for the better.

There are only a few modules I use in manufacturing to make pretty much any shape imaginable within the 3-4 axis environment:

Fixed Contour for planar milling and contours.
Cavity Mill to rough out our blocks.
Hole making.

That is all it takes to use this software. There is no reason at all to go picking through the ump-teen other choices since they are just fixed contour with preset options, or planar mill which boundary method covers. Once you get a few good templates setup it's not bad at all.
Dawson, thanks for the post. I'm starting to get the hang of it now. The guys I work with seem to do most of their work the same way as you. They use what works most efficiently, and don't spend a lot of time digging around for other ways to do it.

It's just that coming from a background in Surfcam, it's a pretty huge leap. I know what I want to do with a particular part, but the approach in UG is so different. One thing I've found that I like is the "sequence tool" for roughing, where the successive tools remove what was left by the previous tool. In Surfcam, that was called SRM, or step reduction milling. Well, I will keep plugging away, and one day I will be more efficient!

One other question: We use Vericut to check our programs at the G-code level, and do not use the verify in UG. My co-workers say it can't be trusted. I use the verify to get a pre-look at what's going to happen before I run the programs through Vericut, and I haven't discovered anything unexpected yet, although it's still early.

Bill
Reply With Quote

  #15   Ban this user!
Old 03-22-2006, 07:04 AM
Dawson's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 16
Dawson is on a distinguished road

If you have the Cavity Mill module you can get it to remove only what what the previous tool missed. To do this go into cutting. Towards the bottom you will see reference tool. Chose the previous tool from there and your done. I then usually change the method to profile since I normally step down tools in 1/2*dia. increments. It's pretty much an automated process. I can usually get a roughing program done in 10-15 minutes this way.

As for Vericut, I always run the cls file to check my code. The only time it will be less accurate than the G-Code is if you make a lot of edits to the .nc code after it's posted which I don't recommend for obvious reasons. Also, it takes only a few key-strokes within UG to vericut from the .cls file. I've figured out how to do it from the .nc code, but it takes substantially longer. I don't post process until the file is complete using this method, and I've found the results to be 100% reliable.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #16   Ban this user!
Old 05-04-2006, 01:13 AM
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 14
larrycoyle is on a distinguished road

CAMSTER,

Since you have so much experience I have a question for you. My first CAD/CAM software package was NX and I am now using NX4 doing simultaneous 5-axis machining with a FIDIA CNC. We CNC Port cylinder heads and the problem I am having (I am wanting to change the way I currently do it) is that I need to be able to create a helix along a curved line. If you can help me I would really appreciate it and just to let you know, I am not asking you to do this for nothing. I just need to get the problem resolved.

Larry
Reply With Quote

  #17   Ban this user!
Old 06-13-2006, 12:57 PM
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 134
camster is on a distinguished road
Helix question

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner I have been out of the office for a while. Contact me directly at

joyce@ikstata.com
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361