
02-03-2006, 11:08 AM
|
| *Registered User* | | Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: USA Age: 46
Posts: 239
| |
I have used Autocad for over 20 years producing drawings for the construction industry. It did take a little time to get used to the different naming convention of functions and the methodology differences in OneCNC, because they are so different, but in no time I became accustomed to OneCNC's command structure. One big difference is the use of a command line, Autocad has one, and OneCNC doesn't. This was probably the biggest hurdle.
I have to say drawing in 2D is still a little easier in AutoCAD. But heck, that is Autocad's bread and butter.
I believe AutoCad's main market is utilizing the software to produce biddable documents for the construction industry. This is where I spent the last 20 years doing (and continue to spend); designing the Mechanical infrastructure for all types of buildings. They have spent a lot of time and money developing addon modules for that business. I do not believe Autocad has many competitors that have software that can compete in this arena. Only one comes to mind and that is Microstation. Architects like using that software.
So, I am not surprised that an office that sells Autocad and Rhino is actually outselling Autocad with Rhino if the clientele is in the modeling and machining business. Autcad is overkill for those tasks. Really you should be comparing Autocad LT to Rhino, since Autocad LT can do almost everything the full version of Autocad can do with the exception of not having a integrated programmable interface (LISP & VBA) and a few other things. Autocad LT can be had for under a $850.
Sweeney, give OneCNC a call for a demo and give it a good test drive, if you haven't already, I think you will be very impressed.
Chris |