CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > CAM Software > General CAM Discussion


General CAM Discussion Discuss CAD/CAM software and Design software methods here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 03:26 AM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2
mikenelson is on a distinguished road
Solid model to CNC code quession

We have both Pro/Engineer and SolidWorks here and use AlphaCAM from Licom to program our Hass 5 axis mill. We recently lost our programming expert and I am trying to get an understanding of what this system should be capable of. I am told that they (the workshop) can only work from 2D dxf file input and that seems to me to be a very limited and error prone way of inputting the CAD models. I expected that I would be able to send them a 3D model in an appropriate format (iges,step,parasolid,etc) and the ALphaCAM software would enable the CAM programmer to apply the appropriate cutters to the shapes to generate the machining code. Our workshop tells me that they can only work from 3D data when machining conplex shapes using a ball nosed cutter but I feel sure that this is really that they just don't know how to use the model. I am not a CNC programmer but am an experienced user of CAD software. I need to gain enough knowledge to work with our workshop to make the machining of designs like the one in the attached picture achievable from a 3D model and thus avoiding the errors that are happening when working from 2D data.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	cnc1.jpg‎
Views:	259
Size:	27.8 KB
ID:	497  
__________________
Mike Nelson
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 04:34 AM
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 23
GOMEZ107 is on a distinguished road
Mikenelson,

You don't need 3d data to work with the sample images you show in the thread, those are simple parts that a 2d drawing will be enough. They may require multiple setups, but in the overall, they are very simple parts to do. Remember , in the shop , a machinist only needs to know the tickness, the length and width of a part(plus the position of other features, as holes, pockets and the likes), and a good 2d drawing with a couple of views and cut off willdo.

gomez107
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 07-07-2003, 08:21 AM
cadcam's Avatar
Community Director
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 2,541
cadcam is on a distinguished road
Mike you are right they should be able to take the 3d model and make code from it. I don,t know that pertuclure software, but I do 5axis and this is a must in this arena.

And as per having the model to a print I am much fater to the muchine this way by far.
__________________
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Cadcam
Mastercam Instructor , Programming Consultant and ME (Manufacturing Eng)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 07-07-2003, 08:23 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,823
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road
Hi Mike,

I'm pretty new to the field of true 3d software myself (I use OnecncXP for 3 axis milling) but I am coming to appreciate quite strongly the benefits of using solid models, even for 2d type jobs, expecially since my software is able to create whatever type of path is needed, whether it be 2d or whatever. This eliminates having to redraw parts (error prone) and also eliminates the dangers of rapid gouging. The proofing tools are exceptional as well, so you can simulate the nc code very precisely to be assured that whatever nc code you have created is proper.

Sure, you can "fool around" with 2d CAD and create toolpaths, but as you suggest, that is not the modern way to work. Perhaps your machinists are "afraid" to use the high class software that your shop is licenced for? I have no idea how machinist friendly those programs are to work with. Could this be the source of the resistance to "make the switch" to full 3d?

As a small shop owner, head programmer and chief of the cnc department (I am the cnc department ), I can vouch for the user friendliness of the software I use, and I feel it represents an intuitive CADCAM solution that your machinists would be able to use to comfortably handle a lot of your programming (up to 3 axis anyways) with a minimal learning curve.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

Last edited by HuFlungDung; 07-07-2003 at 09:16 AM.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 08:45 AM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2
mikenelson is on a distinguished road
Hi Thanks for the reply. I know that this part can be done using just the 2D data an indeed give me a Bridgeport and a cutter and I could make it the old way from a drawing. It is really just an example. What I am trying to acertain is that it is perfectly feasable that top-end commercial CAM software can take in the 3D model of a part like this and allow the machine code to be generated.
__________________
Mike Nelson
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 09:24 AM
Buried's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Ct
Posts: 29
Buried is on a distinguished road
I would have to agree with cadcam and HuFlung. Yes the parts in the pics could be done with some 2d drawings, but i believe you could accomplish the same thing faster (and I would think more efficiently(sp?))with the 3d Model....or I could anyway.



As for AlphaCAM, I've never heard of it, so I'm not quite sure what it can accomplish.Only able to import 2d sounds pretty strange....It can only import 2d, but you can make 3d surface toolpaths with it?



Does anyone else smell that?......
__________________
You can't live forever, but can you be dead forever.....
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 07-07-2003, 09:27 AM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,823
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road
Mike, I'd like to add that perhaps some of your other people think that we only need to use full blown 3d CADCAM when the complexities of 3d geometry dictate it, but what is often overlooked, is that the processes in 2d are often much more complicated to program for. By this I mean that quite a bit more mental programming effort is required "per line of nc code output" for a part that is made of (many) 2d processes.

This is where I found Onecnc's NC manager to be of immense benefit, because it allows me to document what I used to carry in my head out to the machine. This much more effectively captures what procedures were used, in the event that I come back to the same part in a few months, and want to modify the methods of machining it.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 10:47 AM
CAMmando's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Phila PA, USA
Posts: 146
CAMmando is on a distinguished road
Most likely when importing solids into your "Alpha CAM" (which Im not familiar with) the resulting geometry is surfaces (maybe solids). For 2 1/2 axis milling, most toolpathing is accpmplished easiest by using drive curves not surfaces or solids. Extracting drive curves from solids or surfaces can at times be tedious until you are familaiar how to flavor the iges (or step or whatever) output and input of the systems involved. So for a part like you have shown, I would ask for the following using MasterCAM:

1) Step, ACIS, or Parasolids file.

OR

2) IGES With surfaces and wireframe either in separate or a single file.


DXF would be the last (worst choice).

This assumes your models are accurate and modeled at "Nominal".

It is possible that AlphaCam doesnt deal well with extracting drive curves from surfaces or solids. But I still cant imagine why someone would prefer DXF over Iges since DXF is strictly a 2D format. Unless they just dont trust your Models.
__________________
Wee aim to please ... You aim to ... PLEASE.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 12:08 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 214
Mortek is on a distinguished road
Sounds to me like you may not be getting straight information on the Alphcam from the shop or maybe they don't know it's limitations or capabilities. I would get the manual to the Alphacam and see for myself what kind of file formats it can handle and whether it is capable of doing both 2d and 3d work as you would like.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 10:54 PM
hardmill's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 499
hardmill is on a distinguished road
check here....

http://www.alphacam.com/licom/Home.cfm?Language=US
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 07-07-2003, 10:55 PM
hardmill's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 499
hardmill is on a distinguished road
check here....

http://www.alphacam.com/licom/Home.cfm?Language=US

PEACE
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want to build CNC Router for routing 3/4" MDF and solid wood Darren_T DIY-CNC Router Table Machines 28 10-15-2006 09:31 PM
parametric programming Karl_T CamSoft Products 21 05-24-2005 03:58 PM
solid works cnc files krustykrab Mastercam 38 06-19-2004 10:53 AM
CNC G CODE Verification/ Simulation motomitch1 General CAM Discussion 10 01-18-2004 09:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353