It does answer the question. But sometime when your not busy I'd like to see the same test done on your trotec 80 watt .
Hi bigbird. As for the engraving...I think most people who had never seen the difference, they wouldn't think much about it on woods and such. I have the ability to directly compare the two so I get to see the difference more up close. On some other substrates like glass though it might be more problematic. I'm not using it for glass so that doesn't apply here.
The Chinese laser has little lines in it in between each row, and/or where they overlap (in my limited testing). See my attached photo, this is what I was able to get it after some tweaking. If you look very closely you can see the little lines where each row of the beam meets. **NOTE: The built in camera of my phone smooths some of them out so they are harder to see in the photo than in person.** Using a 2" lens at 800 speed here. Looked the same at 900 speed which is near the rated max speed for the Thunder Laser. If I did the same with an RF laser with a 2.5" or even a 4" lens you wouldn't be able to see where the row of each beam met. The RF laser would also be faster at engraving. It's not the power limiting the engraving speed here, I'm only running at 1/2 power. It's the speed the laser can move at. Does that answer your question?