![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Gecko Drives Discuss all Gecko drives here and get direct support! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hey all! Can anyone tell me if this all sounds right? A 2 TPI ground ballscrew would require 400 steps (on a 1.8Deg stepper motor) to move 1 inch. Assuming this is correct, what is the best way to drive this screw with my G203V's, pac/sci 850 Oz motors, and smooth stepper board. I also am planning on running 1.8:1 belt reduction with some large timing pullys I have. Is there a way to make the motors have more steps per rev, thus increasing smoothness of travel and decreasing minimum travel distance? If my math is correct, with a 1.8:1 reduction, I will require 720 steps to achieve a one inch movement? Are there smooth stepper settings that can be changed to micro step? Gecko settings? I would love to hear your thoughts... Nate,
__________________ Nate. Ann Arbor Meechigan |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| The Gecko's are 10 microsteps. So you'll be at 4000 steps / inch. Is this a plasma machine? I'd run it direct drive and see how it works. The router guys are running 2 tpi acme with no problems.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hey Gerry! Long time no talk. I still owe you a beer for all the help youve given me over the past few years... Anyway, its not for plasma. its for a large lathe/mill that im scratch building on a Vinco optical inspecion machine table. 72"x20" hand scraped surface plate essentially. 3000 frigging lbs!! I picked up a few 1.5inch dia, 2tpi ground ballscrews for pennies. The're monsters, but with reduction, Im guessing I will be able to drive them just fine. your thoughts?
__________________ Nate. Ann Arbor Meechigan |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Lets see: 2 TPI * 1.8 = 3.6 TPI 850 oz-in motors * 3.6 ratio = 3060 oz-in holding torque or about 2500 oz-in dynamic torque (max) 3.6 TPI * 200 steps (motor) * 10 uS = 7200 steps/inch Ignoring backlash that would give you about +-0.00014 step resolution based on the resolution of the stepper itself. Somewhere I remember reading where one of the Gecko guys were talking about the phase lag of the stepper while moving could be as much as 1/2 step. So given that number you would have a step resolution of +-0.00069, about a 1.4 thou window (ignoring backlash). The big question is will you have enough torque to accelerate the mass of the machine?
__________________ Jeff Birt |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Wow. very interesting calculations. I can only vaguely comprehend them. Any chance I can get you to explain in laymans terms how you did that calculation. The machine is being built on a large surface plate with linear rails (angled flat roller INA) 55" long for the Z axis. The Y will be on 30" ball rails of similar weight and size. The above applies to when its being used as a lathe. When in mill mode, it will have around a 20" X and a 15" Y and a 4" Z. Im ballparking my weight of the "carriage" of the Lathe will be around 200 Lbs (MAX, this is my high side estimate)This will include Y axis rails and trucks, ballscrew and mounts, aluminum plates(construction of the carriage), tools etc... I am unclear on how to calculate if this is feasable or not...
__________________ Nate. Ann Arbor Meechigan |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| 2 turns per inch of the screw x the gear reduction of 1.8 = 3.6 turns of the stepper per inch of movement. At 2000 steps per revolution, that gives you 7200 steps/inch. 1/7200 = .00014" per step.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Huh, ok, its starting to make sense! Belt reduction is almost done, ballscrew mount is in the works. I have a few more days worth of evenings working on this thing before I can run the Z (in lathe mode) and see if this motor can turn the ballscrew and push some weight around. Nothing is really built yet, but my first test is just turning the Z ballscrew and seeing if it will push some weight across the table.
__________________ Nate. Ann Arbor Meechigan |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BALLSCREW ground 10/2 preloaded 100 dollar | veteq | Linear and Rotary Motion | 11 | 12-11-2008 02:07 PM |
| 203v DC Ground to enclosure heat-sink - yes / no? | DrStein99 | Gecko Drives | 5 | 07-19-2008 06:28 PM |
| Another which is better R&P,Ground ballscrew,rolled ballscrew,Acme,beltdrive etc.thre | lgalla | Linear and Rotary Motion | 10 | 01-16-2007 11:27 AM |
| Ground ballscrew... | WilliamD | Linear and Rotary Motion | 3 | 12-07-2006 06:07 PM |
| Ground Ballscrew - No nut! | Swede | General Metal Working Machines | 4 | 11-20-2004 02:42 PM |