| |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Gecko Drives Discuss all Gecko drives here and get direct support! |
| | |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
 
03-24-2010, 02:18 AM
| |||
| |||
Is there an advantage to use the PMDX-132 over the PMDX-125 for G203 drivers on a mill? I see the 132 is designed specifically to mate directly with the gecko drives which is nice but I think the 125 is a little more versatile, expandable which to me is nicer. Just comparing the features Im inclined to go for the 125 but Im concerned that the 132 is the 'gecko' BOB. Am I missing something?  |
|
| | |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PMDX-122 and Mach3 | ranchak | Mach Mill | 0 | 01-23-2010 02:56 PM |
| Problem- GECKO W/202 AND PMDX 131 | glengen3 | Gecko Drives | 0 | 05-04-2008 05:00 PM |
| Mach3 + PMDX-122 | Burn | Mach Software (ArtSoft software) | 0 | 01-06-2008 02:33 PM |
| Making a Relay with the PMDX-122 | Burn | General Electronics Discussion | 0 | 03-27-2007 09:02 PM |
| Last minute purchasing decision- PMDX-122 | Burn | Benchtop Machines | 0 | 03-15-2007 03:11 PM |
| | |
Linear Mode
