![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| G-Code Programing Discuss G-code programing and problems here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hey! I'm using a turning machine with a fanuc O-T system .. Can anyone tell me whats wrong with this kind of code? Code: .... G70 P1 Q2 N1 G00 X 10. .... ... .... G01 Z-30. F0.1 X30. N2 G70 P1 Q2 G28 U0 W0 ... Code: G70 P1 Q2 G70 P1 Q2 |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| It's just so weird to make G70 work as a function if G71 is used first, but if not it works just like a GOTO.. It's just so unlogical!! And so unlike fanuc from my experience. And what about if you start a program and then jump over the G71 command and goes straight to G70, will it still act like this? Or will it check for G71 in the program in some way? It sound crazy to me.. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Ok, so you have to have a G71 command to have a G70 command? It's so strange that G70 don't have the same function if you don't use G71 first, you allready have a GOTO command! Why make an exeption in the behavior of G70 that has no possitive effect at all? It looks like a flaw to me! G70 should read from P to Q no mather whats been done previously in the program. Since you have to write a G00 command at the same line as P this is a flaw that could cause a lot of problems in the case of typing errors or cases like mine where you expect it to work as it normally does because most likely the G00 would crash the tool.. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
Seems to me I have run a G70 without a G71,G72,G73 before....................... I'd try it like this. N1 G00 X 10Z.1 G01 Z-30. F0.1 X30. N2G0 Z.1 G70 P1 Q2 G28 U0 W0 That should Run between the N1 and N2 and then repeat. I could be wrong................It is fun to just plug the numbers in and see what works if you got the time. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
I played with a program on my Haas simulator and found it would do G70 without any G71 or G72.
__________________ An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Maybe that's true in the HAAS world but I doubt it. Take it from an old Fanuc lathe guy, you know not what you do. Especially if you are jumping around with modal codes in place in your program. I hope I'm wrong. Can you please tell me why you want to do this lazy thing? |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I am puzzled by your post. I have a program with a G71 sequence that roughs out a profile which is then finished by a G70. I deleted the G71 line and ran the program; it ran and the tool followed the profile path...that is the finished profile path. Which is what I said in my post.
__________________ An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| problem with ,C command | cncozz | G-Code Programing | 12 | 07-02-2008 11:23 AM |
| M09 command does not work | Arrowman | Okuma | 3 | 04-27-2008 08:30 AM |
| Need Help!- Handwheel command and MPG | precourt | CamSoft Products | 5 | 03-24-2008 10:14 AM |
| Home command | mgirard | Mach Mill | 0 | 05-22-2007 01:30 PM |
| what is the same command? | hop | G-Code Programing | 0 | 06-20-2006 05:24 AM |