![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| G-Code Programing Discuss G-code programing and problems here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I Have a Hyuandi-Kia with a 18I-TB with a sub-spindle. I have been playing around with that lately and the way I read the book, You have to specify in the parmaters which axis to operate in syncro. (Main or Sub) I think around 5460's....I dont think you can do it on both of them unless you load a parameter in the G10 mode and then change it back at the front of the program if your using the main also. Jon |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Is this like applying a 4th axis wrap, where Y moves are converted to A?
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| I would say you would convert your feedrate in a manner similar to the way you are converting your Y values to A. To convert circumferential movements to degrees, you use 360/(2PI*R) as a scaling factor for the linear Y movements. Part of that expression is obviously an unchanging constant 360/2PI = 57.29578 That happens to be called a Radian. So in the imperial world, a feedrate of 57.29578 degrees/min will equal 1 ipm circumferential feedrate on the surface of a 1" radius cylinder. For all other radii cylinders, the same factor, divided by the radius of the new cylinder, will give you an equivalent circumferential feedrate. Eg.: to achieve 1 ipm on a 2" radius cylinder 57.29578/2 = 28.64789 degrees/min The exact same procedure (using a scaling factor of 57.29578) will be applied to the Y axis movements to convert them to degrees. I am referring to wrapping a 2d map onto a cylinder. If you are finding your A values directly by layout, then of course you do not need to convert the Y's to A. Otherwise you would apply the same scaling factor to the Y values, to a flat 2d map layout of the features to be wrapped around your cylinder.
__________________ First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in. (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |