![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Fanuc Discuss Fanuc controllers here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Hi, I recently buy a new lathe with fanuc oitd, the same program whit g71 roughing type 2 (undercut) : runned on 0itc take 9,30 min runned on 0itd take 11,30 min take more time on 0itd because it going to cut air! The lathe are quite similar and i use same cutting speed Anyone have similar experiance??? Thanks all |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Not familiar with that Fanuc model. Does it use a one or two block call? Two block call allows programmer to specify the retract amount. One block call would require changing this value in a parameter. At least that is my take on the subject. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| I'm with Under on this one. If it is the same structure of a canned cycle typeI or typeII then it would have to be the parameter settings that are related to the canned cycles probably more specific to the retract amounts. Speaking outside of my expertise I would also have to imagine that depending on the servos, how they are tuned, and the specific machine specs will also play in on this. One would think that a Oitd on a brand new shiny lathe would be much faster then a Oitc on 10yr old lathe would be much faster even if the canned cycle parameters are the same. So are we comparing apples to apples............same make, model, year, stroke machine?? Stevo |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Retract amount is the same, servo settings and acc/dec are more faster on 0itd, i'm going to take a video of the same program runnet on the two machine. 0itc 1min 32sec 0itd 1min 48sec 0itd is going to make aircutting!!! I play with parameters but there is no way. the algorith are quite different ![]() ![]() |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
Regards, Bill |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Make some sample this morning. is the algorithm.... in 0id the tool cut first the part without consider cavity, the cut first cavity then go to another cave in feed re cutting the surface between!!!! in oic if the tool find cavity go immediatly down in her |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| It is probably because the 0i-TD performs a rough cut of the finished shape by default. This behavior can be controled by parameter 5105. Set 5105#1 and 5105#2 both to "1" if you don't want the roughing cut. See the highlights in the attached documentation. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| thank you FANUCCNC, I put the Par 5105 RF2 to 1 three weeks ago (for type 1 macro I haven't any problem). How can I post the semple videos, youtube Link? Do you think it's better for me going to use manualguide??? but I think is slow in programming.Do you think manual guide code can put writing directly??? |
|
#12
| ||||
| ||||
| use youtube for videos a long-hand program will always be faster than a program using cycles providing it is written correctly because you have absolute control over tool movement at all times. using conversational software is usually faster than manual programming but of course you must learn to use the conversational software proficiently |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Help!- long time reader first time poster | blu333 | General Metalwork Discussion | 0 | 02-21-2010 05:30 AM |
| Newbie- I'm at complete loss... | lancut | LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) | 1 | 04-24-2009 07:17 PM |
| Field Loss | bbrreid | Servo Motors and Drives | 8 | 09-04-2007 06:00 PM |
| milling time (not to be confused with hammer time) | barefoot0 | G-Code Programing | 4 | 05-02-2007 06:18 PM |
| tacho loss -LED 11 | Daninwyoming | Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills | 0 | 04-21-2007 11:11 PM |