CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Fadal


Fadal Discuss Fadal machinery here!


This forum is sponsored by:

View Poll Results: What is the most significant 'limiting' factor in High Speed Machining on a Fadal
CNC Control 30 76.92%
Work Holding 1 2.56%
Cutting Tools 0 0%
Cutting Tool Holder 2 5.13%
Depth of Cut 3 7.69%
Programmed Tool Path 3 7.69%
Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2003, 01:27 AM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
Fadals new Augusta control or 104d

We had Fadal Engineering do a test cut for us using their new Augusta control, otherwise known as the 104d.

Its pretty fast, has good compatibility with legacy Fadal routines, is supposed to be their new control on all the CNC line by early 2004.

Fadal has finally decided to address the serious deficiencies in their control designed in the 1980’s. That is 15 years ago!

The CNC industry should not tolerate any longer poor performance and high repair and component prices!

Why should we have to pay hundreds of $s for memory, keyboards, even the PC in an MP32 control option is 3 times what a PC would cost… And how about the price they ask for a floppy drive, you’ve gotta be kidding!

Is there any interest out there in discussing the limitations and solutions for this aging CNC control?

I’d be glad to help…

Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 12-09-2003, 10:12 AM
Klox's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NZ
Posts: 509
Klox is on a distinguished road
Welcome to CNCzone Scott_bob!
Personally i don't know anything about the Fadal Control. It's an interesting point you make on spares, repairs to CNC controls.

Do you have knowledge on other controls? I think this can get a very interesting topic.....

Klox
__________________
*** KloX ***
I'm lazy, I'm only "sparking" when the EDM is running....
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 12-09-2003, 12:20 PM
cadman's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 489
cadman is on a distinguished road
About 1 1/2 years ago I was told Fadal was coming out with a new controller and it was supposed to be at WESTEC this past year, so its a good thing they are finally going to release it.

I would like to see them support the NURBS G code (G62.2 ?). My cam system will output NURBS and right now roughly 90% of my work coming in is entirely NURBS surfaces. For the most part my controller (-5) works fairly good, but when the toolpaths start to contain lots of simultaneous XYZ points on steep surfaces (especially "L" shaped), the machine starts to jerk and can't keep up with the programmed feedrate.

cadman
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 12-09-2003, 12:36 PM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
I have some experience...
28 years, ugh!
25 years CNC...

Mostly, Fanuc, Fadal, Allen Bradley, Bandit, Tree, Yasnak, oh a bunch more I guess...

But enough about me.
HSM is a revolution in our industry. It is being promoted not so much by machine tool builders at large, but by other high tech players.
End Mills or Cutting Tools have evolved to a state that currently they can go much faster than most CNC machines can go smoothly.
Let me stop here with this. What is meant by smooth motion control?
Automatic Feed reduction?
Fadals ansewer to this is to slow the feed at the end of every block of code. But this is only good when a sharp change in direction is next. Slowing the feed rate when there is not a sharp change in direction is just a waste of time. And in 3D machining, Hugh amounts of time...
In 3D, usually the code is point to point or linear, (but not always) and Fadal has done some work here to improve performance, but that should be another point.

I like the point that one guy on this site says:
1st you get it right, then you go faster...
__________________
Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 12-09-2003, 12:54 PM
Rekd's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: teh Debug Window
Posts: 1,877
Rekd is on a distinguished road
Hi bob, err.. scott.

I didn't vote because the option I would have voted for is not there. (I'll refrain from stating what that option would be). I've used fadals since the early '80s and I'm here to tell you that the controller is nearly the only thing I liked about them. The 'real' keyboard, the functions and utils etc.

'Rekd
__________________
Matt
San Diego, Ca

___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 12-09-2003, 09:43 PM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
what is the factor that:

"most" significantly affects High Speed Machining on a Fadal
HSM is most commonly defined as feed rates above what the Fadal is capable of delivering.

Feeds lower than 300 IPM would be not be considered HSM by some industry definitions. HSM is somewhat relative, because we all refer to processes that are faster than what has been possible to date on our own machinery. But I think that using the phase HSM when we are using feed rates in this lower range of the spectrum <300 IMP, deminishes the term HSM.

The term High Velocity Machining should definetly be reserved for describing processes higher than 1000 IPM. At this level there is much less discussion going on.

There are CNCs out there accurately feeding at "programmed" feeds from 1000 to 3000 IPM. Not on a Fadal...

I say "programmed feeds" because a good control with intelligent look ahead and feed optimization can be programmed at an optimum feed rate for the tool in use, and the control slows down relative to the angular change in dirrection. Like the Fadal does in point to point, only with a much higher degree of accuracy.

Using a .187 dia. Carbide End Mill. How fast can your Fadal mill a slot .250" x 1.000" and hold +/-.001 in 6061-T6 Aluminum say .2 dp?

Feed = ?
__________________
Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 12-09-2003, 10:47 PM
Rekd's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: teh Debug Window
Posts: 1,877
Rekd is on a distinguished road
Using a .187 dia. Carbide End Mill. How fast can your Fadal mill a slot .250" x 1.000" and hold +/-.001 in 6061-T6 Aluminum say .2 dp?
On the Fadals I've run... about 15 IPM, and even then I wouldn't guarentee +-.001



Of course, things may have changed in the last 5 or 10 years since I've used them.

'Rekd
__________________
Matt
San Diego, Ca

___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:04 AM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
ref:

Posted by Rekd on 12-09-2003 07:47 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using a .187 dia. Carbide End Mill. How fast can your Fadal mill a slot .250" x 1.000" and hold +/-.001 in 6061-T6 Aluminum say .2 dp?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the Fadals I've run... about 15 IPM, and even then I wouldn't guarantee +-.001
***************************************************

That sounds just about right... On a Fadal the slot width could be held +/-.001 going NO faster than F15.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I should have described the end of the slot for this discussion better, it would have R.125 on both ends, so it would be oval, (G03 at both ends)...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Slot length would NOT be +/-.001

Why?
Because the Fadal Control is not accurate within +/-.001 in circular interpolation at feeds higher than F40. Not even the New Augusta or 104d...

A CNC machine uses what is called the "feedback loop" to control the current position in a move as constantly as it is capable of processing. The CNC with the tightest feedback loop will be the most accurate; the loosest feedback loop will be the least accurate.

Let’s face the facts here; we all get what we pay for, right?
The low end priced CNC will not be as tight as the high end priced CNC.

Would any of the Lower priced CNC users out there disagree with this observation:

Accuracy of +/-.001 interpolated circles smaller than .500 in diameter or R.250
Feed NO faster than F15.
Accuracy of +/-.001 interpolated circles bigger than 1.000 diameter or R.500
Feed NO faster than F40.

Anyone perform Renishaw Ball Bar tests on your CNC to see why?
Renishaw identifies and rates the factors as to their affect on circularity…

By the way Rekd, what was that “other” contributing factor that you wanted to include in the poll?

Scott
__________________
Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 12-10-2003, 10:47 AM
Rekd's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: teh Debug Window
Posts: 1,877
Rekd is on a distinguished road
Originally posted by Scott_bob
ref:

Posted by Rekd on 12-09-2003 07:47 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using a .187 dia. Carbide End Mill. How fast can your Fadal mill a slot .250" x 1.000" and hold +/-.001 in 6061-T6 Aluminum say .2 dp?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On the Fadals I've run... about 15 IPM, and even then I wouldn't guarantee +-.001
***************************************************

That sounds just about right... On a Fadal the slot width could be held +/-.001 going NO faster than F15.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I should have described the end of the slot for this discussion better, it would have R.125 on both ends, so it would be oval, (G03 at both ends)...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Slot length would NOT be +/-.001

Why?
Because the Fadal Control is not accurate within +/-.001 in circular interpolation at feeds higher than F40. Not even the New Augusta or 104d...

A CNC machine uses what is called the "feedback loop" to control the current position in a move as constantly as it is capable of processing. The CNC with the tightest feedback loop will be the most accurate; the loosest feedback loop will be the least accurate.

Let’s face the facts here; we all get what we pay for, right?
The low end priced CNC will not be as tight as the high end priced CNC.

Would any of the Lower priced CNC users out there disagree with this observation:

Accuracy of +/-.001 interpolated circles smaller than .500 in diameter or R.250
Feed NO faster than F15.
Accuracy of +/-.001 interpolated circles bigger than 1.000 diameter or R.500
Feed NO faster than F40.

Anyone perform Renishaw Ball Bar tests on your CNC to see why?
Renishaw identifies and rates the factors as to their affect on circularity…

By the way Rekd, what was that “other” contributing factor that you wanted to include in the poll?

Scott
You're absolutely right, Scott. To do a circle THAT small with a Fadal would take an act of congress..

Have another look at the poll, in which I have now voted.. (WoW, I tied it up!) My second choice would be the programmed tool path, as it would directly affect the functionality via Feeds.

'Rekd
__________________
Matt
San Diego, Ca

___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 12-10-2003, 12:17 PM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
Ref. (new entry in the Poll)…

A Different Controller/Machine

Response by,

Matt
CNCZone Community Director
San Diego, Ca

Your problem is my problem. Unless I have a problem with your problem. In which case we have a problem.


This is absolutely my point!
So, to ask again the Poll Question:

What is the most significant factor in High Speed Machining on a “Fadal”

Your answer is door #1 or CNC control right?

Remember the question is “on a Fadal”… You are absolutely right, that without either changing the control, in which case the CNC would no longer be a Fadal or, change the whole CNC, true HSM is not possible!

Ref.
HSM is most commonly defined as feed rates above what the Fadal is capable of delivering.

Feeds lower than 300 IPM would be not be considered HSM by some industry definitions. HSM is somewhat relative, because we all refer to processes that are faster than what has been possible to date on our own machinery. But I think that using the phase HSM when we are using feed rates in this lower range of the spectrum <300 IMP, deminishes the term HSM.


Is any body out there interested in a solution to this problem of doing HSM on a Fadal CNC VMC or HMC, or any other low end CNC machine?
There are solutions!

Come on, chime in folks…

The only way you’re going to get your favorite Machine Tool Builder to listen to your demands is by leveraging your opinion!
Is your CNC builder listening to you?

Best Regards,
Scott
__________________
Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 12-10-2003, 12:40 PM
Rekd's Avatar
Community Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: teh Debug Window
Posts: 1,877
Rekd is on a distinguished road
I'm not sure where you're going with this, but I've got an idea.

Mayhaps you should re-phrase the question. As I read it, it is limiting me to a choice of what's already available on the Fadal. Perhaps a question like "What is the most significant change Fadal could make to improve/add performance for HSM" Or "What is the most significant 'limiting' factor in High Speed Machining on a Fadal"

Just a thought.

BTW, are you a Fadal user, rep, engineer, lawyer or what? You mention you 'can help', in what ways?

'Rekd
__________________
Matt
San Diego, Ca

___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 12-10-2003, 02:10 PM
Scott_bob's Avatar
Mfg Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 458
Scott_bob is on a distinguished road
Ref.
__________________
Mayhaps you should re-phrase the question. As I read it, it is limiting me to a choice of what's already available on the Fadal. Perhaps a question like "What is the most significant change Fadal could make to improve/add performance for HSM" Or "What is the most significant 'limiting' factor in High Speed Machining on a Fadal"
__________________


I'll try to improve the Poll Question, (If there is an admin looking, go for it, I tried but I don't have access even though I started the thread)
I like your suggestion:
__________________
What is the most significant 'limiting' factor in High Speed Machining on a Fadal
__________________

To your BTW, Qu.
Yes, no, yes, no
And I can only help by passing on my experience.

Would you or anyone else be interested in making your CNC Milling machine accurate in 2D or 3D contouring?
Matt, you are correct, you cannot get there with a Fadal control, old or new...
"There" means to me; true HSM or smooth accurate feed rates ABOVE 300 IPM for Aluminum, and smooth accurate feeds for harder materials 3-5 times the feeds possible on the lower end CNC machines out there...

Keep in mind that HSM means:
lighter depth of cuts at very high feeds, with better cutting tools and more RPM...
(very generally defined)
HSM is more a process, than a destination.

I'll give as much info as you want to hear.
Is anyone else interested besides Matt?

Regards,
Scott
__________________
Scott_bob
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
G-Code to DXF WayneHill OpenSource Software 189 01-30-2012 11:15 AM
Stepper control software suggestions jlawren6 General CAM Discussion 6 05-21-2011 06:42 AM
Visual Basic Controller Project dwwright Visual Basic 29 02-14-2011 02:24 PM
CNC Glossary CNCadmin CNCzone Club House 17 03-09-2008 04:08 PM
HAAS Indexer Prodramming / Control CAMmando Haas Mills 8 06-10-2003 11:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353