CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > MetalWorking Machines > Fadal


Fadal Discuss Fadal machinery here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 02-05-2006, 10:36 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Age: 36
Posts: 493
Edster is on a distinguished road
Polychain belt conversion for VMC15

I have a 1994 vmc15 with a 7500rpm belt driven spindle. I'm converting the belt to the polychain cogged version on newer models. I have all the parts I need, but I'm running into a slight problem. The new poly chain pullys are the same size for a 1 to 1 ratio. The old pully has two sets of pullys one looks to be a 1 to 1 ratio the other looks like it's got some reduction on it. My old belt happens to be on the upper set with the reduction.

Here's my problem, is my spindle actually running slower that it's supposed to? If so how can the rigid tap option still work? If anyone has a fadal like mine can you verify which set of pullys your belt runs on.

Thanks,
Ed


Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 02-06-2006, 02:19 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Age: 36
Posts: 493
Edster is on a distinguished road

I got a non-contact tach today and verified the spindle speed. Half of what the control was displaying. The previous owner must have switched the position of the belt on me. Rigid tap was working before despite of what speed the control was programed at. Does this mean the machine is counting the spindle revolutions at the spindle? Will switching the belt over mess with the rigid tapping?
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 02-06-2006, 06:06 PM
HuFlungDung's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,825
HuFlungDung is on a distinguished road

Can you tell where in the drive train the spindle encoder is being driven from? If it is after the power belt pulleys, then it would not be affected by the input ratio.

Alternatively, providing that there is no belt slippage, and the encoder index only serves to provide a start signal for the initiation of threading, would it really matter what the speed was? The precaution for most automatic threading is that the speed command must never be changed during a multi-pass threading procedure. This leads me to think that the engagement point for rigid tapping is not absolutely fixed, but it will repeat at a given rpm and given start point.

Edit: BTW, good luck with your Polychain conversion. I found mine got to be quite noisy at high speed....so much so that I hated it. I switched to an EaglePd drive, with herringbone style pulleys and belt. Much nicer, much quieter.
__________________
First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 02-07-2006, 09:23 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Age: 36
Posts: 493
Edster is on a distinguished road

I think the encoder is driven off the spindle. There is a small magnet in the spindle pully and a sensor in the orientation bridge. But I'm not 100% sure.

I would think the machine would have to know the exact spindle speed so it could feed x ammount per turn for rigid tapping. It will pickup the the same thread. I've had to adjust the thread depth before and it had no problems tapping the same hole a second time.

I did switch the position on the pullys and the spindle speed is right were it's suppose to be. I also tested the rigid tapping. Cutting air only. I'm still waiting for a part for the drawbar from fadal. It looks like it works fine. In fact I would get spindle motor overloads above 1000 rpm when the belt was in the wrong position. Now It will tap at 1500 rpm no problems, which seems to be the max for the machine. I tried a few speed settings above 1500 and it reverted back to 1500.

Initially I was switching to the polychain because the belt would occasionally slip when using a 1/2-13 thread forming tool in copper. Maybe I can get away with a new belt on the quieter pullys now that there is more surface contact with the belt. I have two haas lathes with the polychain belts. They are really noisy and I rarley run the sl-10 over 3000. I bet it would be really loud at 7500rpm.

The real kicker is the fact that I've had this machine for over 3 years, and the spindle speed was 1/2 what I thought it was.

I just thought the machine was kinda weak. .002 chiploads were really .004, .003 chiploads were really .006. I wonder how much better cycle times I'll get with the correct sfpm and chipload
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 02-07-2006, 11:51 AM
Neal's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chatsworth, Ca
Posts: 896
Neal is on a distinguished road

The Encoder is mounted on the spindle motor shaft. The line count is sent to the Vector drive and is used to verify the RPM. If the count is too low then the vector drive provides more voltage to keep the RPM up. This is how a closed loop system functions. An open loop system, no encoder, simply sends a predetermined amount of voltage out to the motor and does not monitor whether the RPMs vary or not.
The Encoder is also used in rigid tapping to syncronize the spendle motor and axis motor.

Neal
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 02-07-2006, 01:05 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Age: 36
Posts: 493
Edster is on a distinguished road

So if my rigid tapping was working before with the 50% reduction will I have to change some settings when I'm using the 1:1 pulleys?
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-08-2006, 09:42 AM
Neal's Avatar  
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chatsworth, Ca
Posts: 896
Neal is on a distinguished road

Once you have the RPM issue corrected, I would advise that you have the Rigid Tap function re-calibrated. The Gain and ramp are very important fro proper tracking.

Neal
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361