CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > Events, Product Announcements and More > Environmental & Alternate Energy


Environmental & Alternate Energy Discuss Global Warming alternative energy etc here.


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Ban this user!
Old 09-16-2011, 02:36 PM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road

Project update:

I am able to fabricate the cogged pulleys that are required. Adding idler pulleys will be challenging. I have to order larger diameter timing belts so the pulleys can be a larger diameter to allow better bolt hole placement. Comments welcomes.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	32
Size:	115.9 KB
ID:	142098   Click image for larger version

Name:	2.jpg‎
Views:	29
Size:	116.3 KB
ID:	142099  
Reply With Quote

  #62   Ban this user!
Old 09-21-2011, 05:56 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 180
40fordcoupe is on a distinguished road

Have you considered poly-vee belts instead of cog belts?
It might be easier to fabricate the pulleys.
Nice work BTW
Reply With Quote

  #63   Ban this user!
Old 09-25-2011, 06:21 AM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road
VAWT belt drive

Greetings, project update:
Timing belts and pulleys are installed on a test rig. Because the pulleys are made using two pieces I was able to bevel each piece toward the center of the pulley. This forces the belts to track toward the center of the pulley so a lip is not required. I have to find the correct tool to bend the spring into the correct shape. This is a first attempt but it appears to be working. The spring pulls on the top and bottom of the movable shaft and all belts have tension. Again this is a experiment and a learning experience, I do not know how long the belts will last. The next step is to mount it on the PMA and perform a road test. The current configuration is a 1 : 6 ratio.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	side.jpg‎
Views:	62
Size:	119.0 KB
ID:	142643   Click image for larger version

Name:	spring.jpg‎
Views:	73
Size:	119.6 KB
ID:	142644   Click image for larger version

Name:	top.jpg‎
Views:	61
Size:	114.4 KB
ID:	142645  

Last edited by Burnit0017; 09-25-2011 at 05:12 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #64   Ban this user!
Old 10-01-2011, 10:22 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: US
Posts: 162
Fish4Fun is on a distinguished road

I have just found this thread today and read through it. I just want to make a few comments....

Burnit0017,

First, VERY impressive work on both the stacked design and the gearing; however, I think you will find you would be a lot better off concentrating your efforts on direct drive. You asked earlier in the thread about more coils/magnets VS Larger coils magnets....the answer is not completely straight-forward, but in your case you should increase the number of magnets/coils to achieve higher voltage.

You should find a fairly linear relationship between No-Load voltage and RPM; taken to the simplest case it should be fairly obvious that the more times a coil changes from North to South, the higher the output. This being said, a typical DIY wind turbine has a rather wide RPM range. If your PMA is designed to cut-in @ say 200RPM and 6mph wind speeds, it is quite likely it will turn over 1000rpm at high wind speeds. This implies that you would have 70V No Load @ 1000RPM (0.07V/RPM). This is a VERY typical problem with PMAs for Wind Turbines.

Believe it or not, you are 90% of the way to a solution with your stacked stator design. You should focus on achieving 1/3 of your cut in voltage at your target RPM PER stator (for a three stator design). You then wire your stators together via relays so that they are configured to all be in series until the output reaches a predetermined level, then you engage the relays and the stators are then configured in parallel. Your resistance will drop by 1/3 and your efficiency will increase. (Obviously the voltage will be clamped to your battery voltage, and the increase in current output will be the result decreased losses in the stator coils.)

With a four stator design this idea can be expanded to: 1) All Series 2) Two Series in Parallel 3) All Parallel . This technique can also be used on single stator designs with 2 or more coils per phase. The simplest technique to engage the relays is separate coils of smaller wire and ~15% fewer turns on all of the coils in a particular phase group (ie one leg). This independent, single phase coil is then rectified and connected to the relay coils. For a "switch over" @ around 30V you would use a 24V relay. The additional coil wire should be at least 50% smaller than the primary wire (just large enough to handle the relay current) and can be wound in hand with the primary wires. For a three step process, simply reduce the relay turns to ~45% of the primary turns, and use 12V relays for the first stage and 24V relays for the second stage (it is important in this case to use a voltage regulator for the 12V relays, and it is not a bad idea to use a voltage regulator in all cases). You can use series resistance to fine tune your switch points.

Anyway, I hate to see all the work you have done on your gearing go to waste, but gearing a VAWT really robs a lot of its potential power; solving the problem with relays wastes almost no power and actually gains back a lot of power that was being lost in heat. (If you are interested, here is a link to a thread where I first started thinking about "stacked stator" Axial FLux alternators: The Gotwind Forum • View topic - VAWT Water Pump Calculations skip down to the last few posts, the top part is all about water pumps).


BJenkins earlier in the thread repeatedly mentioned designing a wind turbine for low wind speeds. This is problematic, though a very common goal. The problem is the physics of wind power. Betz's Law ( Betz' law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ) places an upper limit on the amount of energy that can be extracted from wind @ ~59.3%. This is not an arbitrary limit, and more modern approaches have shown that the only way to achieve even this limit is by increasing the TSR (Tip-Speed-Ratio) to infinity, and this Coefficient does not include mechanical losses or energy conversion losses. But the biggest problem is the actual available energy in low speed winds which is defined by:

Code:
E = 1/2 * p * A * V^3 * Cp

Where:
E = Energy 
p = Air Density
A = Area 
V = Wind Velocity
Cp = Coefficient of Power (a derating factor that includes the Betz Limit and must be < 0.593, typically from 0.10 to 0.45)
So, for a swept area of 100m^2 (1076.39ft^2) the total energy (Cp = 1) is as follows:

Code:
Area    Area    Speed   Speed   Power
M^2     Sq Ft   MPH     m/s     Watts
                                        
100.00  1076.4   5      2.2        684
100.00  1076.4   6      2.7      1,181
100.00  1076.4   7      3.1      1,876
100.00  1076.4   8      3.6      2,800
100.00  1076.4   9      4.0      3,986
100.00  1076.4  10      4.5      5,468
100.00  1076.4  11      4.9      7,278
100.00  1076.4  12      5.4      9,449
100.00  1076.4  13      5.8     12,013
100.00  1076.4  14      6.3     15,004
100.00  1076.4  15      6.7     18,455
100.00  1076.4  16      7.2     22,397
100.00  1076.4  17      7.6     26,865
100.00  1076.4  18      8.0     31,890
100.00  1076.4  19      8.5     37,505
100.00  1076.4  20      8.9     43,744
100.00  1076.4  25     11.2     85,438 
100.00  1076.4  30     13.4    147,638
A 100M^2 wind turbine has a diameter of 11.28M (37ft) which is very small for commercial, very large for DIY, but serves to illustrate how little power there is in light wind compared to how much power is in even moderate winds. Following are projections of power collected over 30 days for constant wind speeds from 5mph to 50mph (2.24m/s to 22.4m/s) and a Cp of 0.50:

Code:
formula ==>  kWh = Cp * kW Avail * 24 Hours * 30 days

Wind               kW        #        kWh        Retail    
Speed    Cp      Available  Days    Produced     Value
   5    0.50      0.684     30       246.24       $24.62
  10    0.50      5.468     30     1,968.50      $196.85
  15    0.50     18.455     30     6,643.69      $664.37 
  20    0.50     43.744     30    15,747.84    $1,574.78
  25    0.50     85.438     30    30,757.68    $3,075.77
  30    0.50    147.638     30    53,149.68    $5,314.97
  40    0.50    349.956     30   125,984.13   $12,598.41
  50    0.50    683.508     30   246,062.75   $24,606.28
The point here is that 4 hours of 30mph wind can produce more power than 30 days of 5mph wind, and 50mph wind has 1000 times more energy in it than 5mph wind. There are several things that should be noted: 1) Choosing a windy site for a wind mill is VERY important 2) The entire wind turbine system should be maximized for efficiency near the high end of the anticipated wind speeds 3) Failing to capture 0-5mph wind is trivial if you consider that the example system would likely be designed to produce upwards of 500kW peak power (again small commercial HUGE DIY). 4) Wind Turbines are ONLY practical where there are fairly constant winds in excess of 10m/s (>20mph), these are typically remote, uninhabited areas because NO ONE wants to live where there is constantly 20mph+ winds. (see #1 ;-) )

Building a DIY wind turbine can be a great experience and provide a tremendous sense of accomplishment, but anyone considering it should be realistic about the amount of power they will be able to produce and have an intimate knowledge of the wind patterns in the area the turbine will be located. I am fascinated with wind turbines in general, and I have a special love for VAWTs, I think they are majestically beautiful and the ultimate in simple elegance; however, VAWTs have proven to be stubbornly inefficient and expensive. Most DIY Wind Turbine builds ultimately fail because the site was chosen w/o regard to prevailing winds and the cost of maintenance eventually out weighs the energy savings. This DOES NOT mean that there are no DIY wind mills producing respectable amounts of power, there are plenty of them, it just means the success stories are generally the exception rather than the rule.

I realize that my rather long post may appear to some to be disparaging of wind turbines, but this is NOT the case. I do think it is important to have a firm grasp on the real-world physics of them and design them with realistic goals in mind. A typical commercial wind turbine build begins with a 2 to 5 year site evaluation. The site evaluation is essentially 24/7 data logging of wind speed and direction. During this evaluation period the turbine design will be continually refined to maximize the output efficiency wrt the data and infrastructure costs will be calculated (things like distance to existing power lines, cost of roads, availability of local maintenance personnel, environmental impact, etc, etc). In contrast to this, most DIYers see a TV special or read an article and decide to put up a wind mill to lower their power bill.

And (FINALLY) :-) to the topic of this thread, "An Open Source Wind Mill Design". I would suggest starting here: Hugh Piggott's home page . Hugh has been working on DIY wind turbines for a couple of decades. While he did not invent the axial flux alternator, he certainly adapted it for DIY wind turbine purposes. I would guess that he has introduced more people to 3 phase power generation than most EE professors. There are MANY, MANY "open source wind mill designs", the problem isn't really finding one, it is selecting the right one for a specific area (or, realizing that a particular area is simply NOT suitable for a wind mill).


Cheers,

Fish

PS: For those interested in a very viable DIY VAWT design, google Ed Lenz VAWT, or visit his site @ VAWT he has a very cool design that is quite well-documented.
Reply With Quote

  #65   Ban this user!
Old 11-01-2011, 03:56 AM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road

Greetings, I finally found the correct timing belts. I had to make new pulleys. I purchased them for a auto parts store and the sales person told me they should be replaced every 60,000 miles. J The teeth are very large and the belts do not stretch. All the problems have been resolved and I do not for see any maintenance problems. Please disregard all earlier posts about timing belts. I am using a standard configuration for one direction operation. Enjoy the day.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	3.jpg‎
Views:	36
Size:	118.3 KB
ID:	145257   Click image for larger version

Name:	side.jpg‎
Views:	34
Size:	118.0 KB
ID:	145258   Click image for larger version

Name:	tbelt.jpg‎
Views:	33
Size:	110.9 KB
ID:	145259  
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #66   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2012, 10:19 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 180
40fordcoupe is on a distinguished road

Good job! I'm guessing that those are camshaft timing belts??
Reply With Quote

  #67   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2012, 01:39 PM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road

Hi, thank you, yes they are auto timing belts. I had to add a bearing within a bearing at the very top to stop the shaft from flexing. I am very happy with the results. I recently found out about the concept of MPPT. The core of the circuit is a Buck converter. The circuit in theory isolated the permanent magnet alternator for the battery allowing the turbine to spin more freely. Then the circuit converts the high voltage and low current to a low voltage and high current which is better for charging batteries. I will post result when available.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1.jpg‎
Views:	41
Size:	119.2 KB
ID:	150349   Click image for larger version

Name:	smallTestcircuitConceptDrawingCompInverter.jpg‎
Views:	50
Size:	19.3 KB
ID:	150350  
Reply With Quote

  #68   Ban this user!
Old 03-03-2012, 05:19 AM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road
Buck converter for small wind turbine project

I am currently searching for away to supply the IC’s with Vcc. I am not sure if I should use a 12 volt linear regulator from the 12 volt battery bank or if there is a method to use the large input capacitor at Vin. The voltage at Vin can range form 0 to over 200 volts open circuit and I do not know how fast the buck converter will drain the cap at Vin when the mosfet is oscillating. Comments are welcome.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	555output.jpg‎
Views:	14
Size:	116.8 KB
ID:	154251   Click image for larger version

Name:	VsMosFet.jpg‎
Views:	15
Size:	119.7 KB
ID:	154252   Click image for larger version

Name:	Vout.jpg‎
Views:	14
Size:	113.3 KB
ID:	154253   Click image for larger version

Name:	TestcircuitConceptVccVdrDrawing.jpg‎
Views:	30
Size:	53.2 KB
ID:	154254  

Reply With Quote

  #69   Ban this user!
Old 03-08-2012, 01:05 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 中国
Posts: 1
venscrusher is on a distinguished road

good talk
__________________
http://www.oreplant.com/products/centrifuge-machine.html
Reply With Quote

  #70   Ban this user!
Old 03-10-2012, 09:17 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CANADA
Posts: 35
hornby chopper is on a distinguished road

hi
good work from every one here .

i have a question and i know that this will sound stupid but here we go.

what about using a wind mill ( like the water pump one from old farms )
and a small altornator with built in regualtor to charge batteries.

the wind mill will have to be ratio up to make it spin fast enough.

then on the bearing of the tower you could bild a comatator so the mill could spinn 360 deg all day

this is just an idea ( might not be a good one )

what thoughts are out there
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #71   Ban this user!
Old 03-11-2012, 06:38 PM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road

Hi, RPM may be a problem, what is the required RPM for the alternator to start charging? Would you have to supply a voltage to energize the alternator? I have a seen a company that uses that wind mill design and reports good numbers, but I think they are using a permanent magnet alternator because they operate at a lower RPM and do not need to supply a voltage to the alternator. I hope to see some photo’s of your project. My project is experimental and I am using a VAWT because it is the easiest to fabricate. The wind mill design you are suggesting does have a proven history. I think it is a good idea.
Reply With Quote

  #72   Ban this user!
Old 03-21-2012, 08:38 AM
Burnit0017's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 84
Burnit0017 is on a distinguished road
Smile VAWT Project update using a buck converter




Hi, the video shows manual operation of PMA using a buck converter to drive a 12 volt 50 watt load. Without the buck converter I can not spin the PMA fast enough to illuminate the light because the faster you try to spin the PMA the more it acts like a electric brake. Adding the buck converter delivers more current to the load and the PMA is much easier to spin. The next phase of the project is to adapt the circuit to charge a 12 volt battery bank. Comments welcome and enjoy the day.


Video showing VAWT operation with no load, just for fun, I am happy spring is here


Last edited by Burnit0017; 03-21-2012 at 08:56 AM.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Open Source Cad Cam kch General CNC (Mill and Lathe) Control Software (NC) 1 08-29-2007 06:51 PM
CNCPRO Open Source Mits Spanish CNCzone 1 06-07-2007 11:04 AM
BEST Open source Controller ? Seventeen Open Source Controller Boards 12 09-21-2005 06:27 PM
What's in work at the open source pminmo Open Source Controller Boards 0 02-13-2005 01:55 PM
Web space available for open source cnc ShayArnett Open Source Controller Boards 1 01-11-2005 09:31 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361