In the mean time, another challenge has been made to Al Gore to debate Global Warming, with the question:Leading climate change experts have thrown their weight behind two scientists who hit out at the "Hollywoodisation" of global warming.
Professors Paul Hardaker and Chris Collier, both Royal Meteorological Society figures, criticised fellow scientists they accuse of "overplaying" the message.
The pair spoke at a conference in Oxford today entitled Making Sense of Weather and Climate and organised by Sense about Science, a scientific trust set up to help dispel the myths surrounding polemic issues such as climate change.
by The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, former policy adviser to Margaret ThatcherThat our effect on climate is not dangerous
Anyone want to bet me that Gore refuses to debate this? I've heard he's already been challenged to debates on similar subjects and refuses to debate them.
I wonder why.![]()
Matt
San Diego, Ca
___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
Steve Milloy invited Gore....and at the top of his website is a running clock.
------------------------------------------
"Does Al Gore really believe in catastrophic global warming?"
"Since Al Gore was offered the opportunity (in person) to facilitate serious debate on the underlying science of global climate change, 1 year, 2 months, 2 weeks, 22 hours, 36 minutes, and 40 seconds have elapsed."
----------------------------------------------
That was as of March 19, 2007, 11:38am.
Gore hisself stated that he talks about global warming in lay terms....because that's what he understands.
Well, there are always going to be two type of people. One that says global warming is happening and lets do something about it. And one that says no, its a load of bull and when it finally happens, oop! Lets do something about it. Which one would you prefer to be?
What's with this fixation on Al Gore? I bet people wouldn't have so much to argue about if the idea about global warming was highlighted further by say the POPE or someone at least everyone like.
I don't think the non supporters are really disagreeing about global warming. More with the fact that they don't like Al Gore. Am I right?
I have been hearing from both camps. And all to often the people screaming the loudest about global warming are the most rabid that only human activity is the sole cause and force. But I have been hearing that there maybe other forces at work here, that are possibly being considered properly. There is points of fact I have to keep remembering and pointing out. That the Sahara desert was not as big as it is now. That scientist have found evidence that the great plains were deserts several times in the past. Glaciers do grow and shrink over time. The poles haven't always been covered in ice.
There is much to concider and think about. Carefully, with out going over the edge with out proper reason.
I think by the time we finish pondering over this possible calamity, majority of the human race would be wiped out.
What you are saying is that since earth itself has a fair share of environmentally detrimental activities, we should just keep going on the way we did.
It may well be the earth cycling tru climate changes. But going the way we do isn't going to help at all.
As the saying goes, if you keep going in a straight line without changing direction, you will end up where you are headed. And I am pretty sure where we are headed.
Steve
DO SOMETHING, EVEN IF IT'S WRONG!
Get a grip, alex. The human race will be fine. Don't let the scare mongers scare you silly.
I can't believe they have people believing that micro-managing the small amount of CO2 that humans contribute will steer the global climate. Just amazes me how gullible the herd is.
Steve
DO SOMETHING, EVEN IF IT'S WRONG!
Hi Madclicker,
I think you got me wrong from the way I posted. I may have sounded abit over dramatic. But you are right, I am concern about global warming and I do believe its happening. And I don't believe the use of fossil fuel the way we do is micro.
Try living in the equatorial region and you will feel the difference. The monsoon season has changed somewhat. And there are alot of other indications which I have to say people living in the northern hemisphere won't feel or know about simply because they are living in a cold country. I think by the time people in the north starts to feel the difference, the equatorial region may not be a comfortable place to live in. Imagine how many people will be affected?
Not trying to be a jerk, but is the weather the same every single year with no variation? How much does the weather change over the course of a few years? Or decades? Or centuries? How much variation is considered normal? Without knowing the data, it's very difficult to conclude that the current change is "bad".
Further, now that you have electricity, television, good hospitals, plenty of food, and clean water, you expect under-developed countries in Asia and Africa to be deprived of these basic necessities because they would contribute to global warming. Those countries will have to keep suffering the high mortality rates due to famine and disease because they will be barred from developing infrastructure and machinery to save lives.
There are three types. The two that you said, and those (the majority?) like me that believe it IS happening, but are questioning the cause. Many (most?) don't believe it's humans being the bulk of the cause.
And we don't like al gore because he's a hypocrite and/or a fear mongering liar.
Matt
San Diego, Ca
___ o o o_
[l_,[_____],
l---L - □lllllll□-
( )_) ( )_)--)_)
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)