Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 15

Thread: RFQ Pre Production Prototyping

  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    RFQ Pre Production Prototyping

    We have a new product for the RC industry that is ready to be prototyped before going to full production. We need 2-3 Prototypes cut and if they check out, meaning fit correctly and the machining work is clean we will be ready to go to production. I estimate production requirements to be 75-125 units per month and we are in a hurry to get these to market. We will probably buy in 100 lots for the first lot or two in case we need to make design changes based on customer feedback. After that we will increase order sizes to reduce administrative overhead and get the machining costs down.

    To protect our designs, we require a Non Disclosure Agreement for all vendors so download the NDA and fill it out and fax it per the instructions at the bottom of the NDA. Be sure to e-mail me after you fax it and I will send the .dwg files and more renderings to you upon recipt. You can download the NDA here.

    If you have any questions, feel free to e-mail me, but I can't go into specifics without the NDA on file.

    Here is a photo of the part:


    We need seperate bids on the prototyping work and the production work.
    Robert Byrd
    www.AtomicMods.com
    e-mail: rob@atomicmods.com


  2. #2
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    29
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Robert,
    Have you considered using a casting?
    The initial mold may run about 3k, but after that your per piece may only be a couple dollars each.
    Just so happens I do that kind of work.
    I design and build the mold (lost wax) and have my foundry pour the metal.
    There will be a minimum of machining, hey I can do that too!

    caitolly

    PS: Please see my ad in the classified section, here on the CNC Zone


  3. #3
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Newtown, CT, USA
    Posts
    522
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That looks like a perfect part for an extrusion. With some followup machining.

    Ken
    Kenneth Lerman
    55 Main Street
    Newtown, CT 06470


  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    561
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I agree with Ken. Going with an extrusion will be the most economical for you motor heatsink if that's what it is. (a) I wouldn't even bother to machine back the two side mounting tangs as per your drawing, just leave them going from front to back of your extrusion and (b) the front part which I imagine is to stop the motor from moving frontwards or backwards which ever it may be, does it really need that? If you make the extrusion slightly undersize in the internal diameter the clamping effect should be more than enough to hold the motor. The end result is a very economical part with the only machining required being to drill the two holes.
    Skippy


  • #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    I'm not opposed to using a partial extrusion process, but the rear wall is required to position the motor properly. The walls must be loose enought to accomodate a variety of motors as they vary slightly. there is another bracket that holds the other ned of the motor keeping it in place. Leaving the mounting tabs long is not a bad idea, but I would prefer them to be cut as per the drawings.
    Robert Byrd
    www.AtomicMods.com
    e-mail: rob@atomicmods.com


  • #6
    Registered
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,825
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    geesch....a motor heatsink........extrude it.....dies....I'm guessing under $2K......

    Oops...just noticed a wall where the motor rests against.....and the bored mounting.....hmmmmmm.....a casting is probably your best bet with 2 post casting operations......mill the wall to give you a flat surface and bore the hole......
    Last edited by ViperTX; 04-10-2005 at 12:49 AM.


  • #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    That may be practical depending on how well it sells, but first we need the prototypes to allow us to test the concept, and then we need a production run of 100 to test the market.
    Robert Byrd
    www.AtomicMods.com
    e-mail: rob@atomicmods.com


  • #8
    Moderator HuFlungDung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,826
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Any way to redesign that part so that you can use a stock cpu heatsink, or some such? That way, perhaps you'd only have to deal with machining the saddle part of the product. Be a nice way to keep costs down for the prototypes, anyways.
    First you get good, then you get fast. Then grouchiness sets in.

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)


  • #9
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    We want it to be one piece for the best heat transfer possible.
    Robert Byrd
    www.AtomicMods.com
    e-mail: rob@atomicmods.com


  • #10
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    11
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLByrd
    We want it to be one piece for the best heat transfer possible.
    copper thermal conductivity is greater than AL!


  • #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0
    Yes, but it is my understanding that copper is more difficult to machine and more expensive. Is this true?
    Robert Byrd
    www.AtomicMods.com
    e-mail: rob@atomicmods.com


  • #12
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    1,744
    Downloads
    1
    Uploads
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RobertLByrd
    Yes, but it is my understanding that copper is more difficult to machine and more expensive. Is this true?
    Yes and Yes, both would add to substantially higher item cost, it is also much heavier if weight is a concern.

    There is some free machining copper but I have no experience with it.


  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Similar Threads

    1. RFQ 4 parts(prototyping asnd small production run)
      By Bartman in forum Employment Opportunity
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: 07-27-2005, 02:24 PM
    2. Replies: 2
      Last Post: 04-30-2005, 06:34 AM
    3. Posting RFQ
      By CNCadmin in forum RFQ (Request for Quote)
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 11-03-2004, 11:57 PM
    4. RFQ closed - scale model machined auto wheels needed
      By joemartins in forum Employment Opportunity
      Replies: 9
      Last Post: 10-27-2004, 09:16 AM
    5. Tell me what I can't do with xp production
      By nervis1 in forum OneCNC
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 12-30-2003, 09:26 PM

    Posting Permissions


     


    About CNCzone.com

      We are the largest and most active discussion forum from DIY CNC Machines to the Cad/Cam software to run them. The site is 100% free to join and use, so join today!

    Follow us on

    Facebook Dribbble RSS Feed


    Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.