![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Employment Opportunity Looking for a job in the machining field, need a employee in the CNC field post it here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
|
I'll do them for a million dollars each for the first two, every pair after that is a half million dollars. ![]() You're going to need to include a .STP or .IGS file for anybody to even begin to quote on something like that. I don't think you have any idea how complicated those parts are. Just the raised letters alone will be a huge machining expense. Then there is the issue of those reverse chamfers that blend into the end bosses. No clue how you think those are going to be machined but, from the photo, they aren't machinable without a sinker EDM ($$$) or making it as a cast part. You really should consider greatly simplifying the design. It will drastically reduce the cost. You're still probably looking at $1,000 for the pair.
__________________ Greg |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Also, are you completely, absolutely, positively sure that you want to make control arms out of 6061? I'd be asking for a release of liability before machining something like this, bare minimum. I used to make road race style 3-Link kits and we used 1.25 x .095 4130N tubing for our lower control arms. I bet they were the same weight, if not lighter than your design, and much stronger for sure. Oh, and a whole lot less expensive! Also consider that if a piece of road debris is kicked up and dings your aluminum control arm, that makes a stress riser. Not a good situation. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
Let me see, Donkey Hotey wants: File format: IGES....ok. couple of days...... Raised letters: change to recessed letters.. . .ok Chamfers that blend into the end boss:... .. .just get close with what ever end mill you use. OK......DH. Last edited by ratrace2; 02-24-2010 at 06:42 AM. Reason: Can't spell anymore. . . |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| You could drop me the SolidWorks part. We also require DIMENSIONED drawings with TOLERANCE schedule, unless you are OK with us making it up ourselves.
__________________ www.integratedmechanical.ca |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
Here is a local company that makes them; http://www.metcomotorsports.com/prod...p?prod=MCA0003 Notice the the price, for a prototype pair you are looking at twice the cost listed on there site. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm not saying it's impossible but, the mill might be nibbling away at the lettering for 2-3 hours (just for the logo). At $65-100/hour for machine time, plus the cost of tiny carbide endmills and you can figure out what that logo is going to cost (by itself). As for the chamfer, it doesn't even look possible. It looks like a closed angle with one vertical wall and one angled wall. There is no way to make that unless you consider a 5-axis machine with a specially ground cutter to be ordinary. It's a nothing feature that will drive the cost of your part out of sight.
__________________ Greg |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
|
#10
| |||
| |||
I could go to a 7000 AI: double the strength qualities of 6000 AI. THanks for the input though. It's nice having guys around that speak up and shine an import light on things. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I agree totally with what is said so far and will add that you are showing it with installed bushings, no spring mounting, and some form of bracket which may or may not be part of this. The only thing that is wanted or needed is the basic part with its necessary geometry's. Don't show the bushings etc. but do show the details of where they go and the dimensions involved ! Complexity is going to be extremely expensive. Your part would be better cast or maybe forged. then just machine in the pockets and mountings. designers and machinist/mechanics have always been at extreme odds with one another !
__________________ Don IH v-3 early model owner |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
Excellent advice, Forging might be a better approach. Man, you guys are the best, though. Really, I have a hundred new Ideas and they will all be better because of this feedback. As the designer of this part, I can accomdate all of your concerns, improve the original design, and still get what I want with improved safety/durability qualities. EDM is one of the techniques for the Letters that some might think about, all the mold making guys know about it. Most of my work in the past has been with composites and mold making. You say: "designers and machinist/mechanics have always been at extreme odds with one another." Of course. Since the machine has it's defined parameter and the imagination knows no bounds..................................... Thanks, ratrace2 |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |