![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| DynaTorch Discuss DynaTorch machines here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
i build my parts in solid works, import the dxf from solid works into sheet cam, then add my lead in lead out and kerf then build the g code. once the g code is made in sheet cam, i try to open it in dynatorch software however it says the part is too large. its like 8,000,000" X 8,000,000" when the part is actually 1" X 2". im sure there is an issue with my sheet cam, maybe the post processor or something. i cant get les newell to help me, has anyone had this issue before or can think of a fix? thanks |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Sounds like either SheetCAM or the import program is in the wrong "units" (inches VS mm) or there is a problem on the import side.. Make sure you have SheetCAM set to the same units as your Dynatorch software. Look at the G-code you get from SheetCAM. Are the numbers crazy? If they are what they should be, then there is nothing wrong with SheetCAM. You may have a format problem (they way the numbers are formatted with leading zeros maybe). The whole key is what the G-code looks like. The WAY the g-code is formatted is controlled by the POST processor in SheetCAM. Especially important is the way the arcs are handled in the G02 and G03 sequence between different controllers. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
thanks for the reply guys, the units in both sheet cam and solid works are correctly in inches. i will check the 1:1 box in solid works however i dont see that being an issue because if i directly place the dxf from solid works into dynatorch software the sizes are exact. torchhead, when you say check the g code numbers, what would be the normal range so i can rule that out. thanks a bunch guys for the imput, i hope i can figure this out. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In my experience, Les has always been very helpful. Usually he needs you to send him the files though. He needs to be able to duplicate what you're seeing. I also use Sheetcam much like you do. But I start from Rhino3D, use a convert to arcs function, then export as DXF. Run that DXF through Sheetcam and apply the included Dynatorch post-processor. Voila. No problems. Now if I forget to "convert to arcs" the splines cause problems and make my curves look awkward. I did get a similar problem to what you're describing when I used CorelDraw. The part wouldn't open in Dynatorch, because the extents were "off the map." If I remember correctly, it had something to do with the DXF format I was exporting in. Does SolidWorks give you options for DXF compatibility (it should)? |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Win your own copy of SheetCam | CNCadmin | CNCzone Site News and Contests | 0 | 10-07-2005 08:27 AM |
| Help me with Mach 3 and sheetcam please | Apples | Mach Plasma / Laser | 1 | 08-28-2005 09:28 AM |
| SheetCAM? | eman5oh | SheetCam | 4 | 12-06-2004 07:09 PM |
| SheetCam now V2.20 | Al_The_Man | General CAM Discussion | 2 | 09-11-2004 06:51 PM |
| SheetCAM | fattuna | General CAM Discussion | 3 | 07-21-2004 02:24 PM |