![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| Dolphin CADCAM Discuss Dolphin CAD/CAM software here. |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
What Post Processor are folks using for EMC2 with Partmaster? I've got Partmaster v8, and can't seem to reliably generate code that EMC2 finds palatable. Sometimes I can manually modify the generated nc code and get it to work, and other times it is beyond my meager gcode skills to fix. Surely there are folks reliably generating nc code for EMC2?!?!? Thanks, Jim |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Hi Chad, I've done some mucking around with the default TurboCnc post processor, and have come up with the attached. I'd very much appreciate someone who knows the Post Processing system taking a look to see if I'm doing anything dumb and/or note where things could be done better. I started out using the Mach2 post, but that was creating gcode that EMC2 was unhappy with - it was producing some gcodes that EMC seemed not to support, some "bad characters", etc. I found that the TurboCNC Post was better syntax-wise, but it was only using 3 decimal digits of precision, which was causing "radius to end of arc differs from radius to start" errors when I did quadrant-based circles. Increasing the decimal precision to 4 digits seems to have resolved that issue. I've also done some other trivial things such as removing the "N" line numbers, removing some header comments that didn't seem to get populated, changing G70/71 to 20/21 (EMC didn't like the 70/71 gcodes), and adding a "%" to the top of the file (EMC was complaining about that, too). At any rate, if you'd be willing to take a look and provide some observations/recommendations, I'd be much obliged! Perhaps I'm better off modifying the Mach2 post (or another altogether) vs the TurboCNC post - the Mach2 post seems much more complicated, so perhaps there are some extra capabilities, efficiencies, etc that I'm missing out on by using the simpler TurboCNC post - I just don't know enough about the Post Processor to make that determination. I'm currently only doing 2.5D stuff, but plan to add a 4th axis at some point, and would also like to do some contour/profile merge milling via the CAM system. I haven't done any merges yet, so don't know if I'll run into problems w/ the PP on that or not. Thanks! |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Chad - just for my general edification - what is the purpose of the 2nd set of format/precision patterns in the Post file you modified for me? (XAXIS, YAXIS, ZAXIS, XARC, YARC and RPLANE) When is one used vs the other, and what is the advantage of having both the lower- and higher-precision patterns? Thanks Again!! Jim |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
The first set is used for Metric units i.e. 3 Decimal Places, the 2nd set is used for Inch units i.e. 4 Decimal Places. If only one set of formats is present then this is used for both Inch and Metric. Chad |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Could the dolphin cad/cam post be put on the emc2 wiki? http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl sam |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
Chad |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
hi guys, i've been trying to get a hold of a post processor for Dolphin CAM that produces G-code for EMC2. Of course I found this thread.. could someone please please send me the post processor itself? It would be much appreciated. Thanks for your support! My email is blake.sessions@gmail.com Blake |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CAMworks / EMC2 post processor | spacewalker | LinuxCNC (formerly EMC2) | 10 | 01-11-2012 03:10 AM |