CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 12:51 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 161
SatanKlawz is on a distinguished road
Will this work?

I asked a more technical question about this setup in another thread and now I am looking for more feedback about it. Basically I am kicking around the idea of mounting 2 linear bearings on the back of my z axis since the mounting pattern will fit perfectly. Originally I was going to make a plate that the z axis mounted to and that plate would of mounted to 4 linear bearings. I know that 4 would be more than sufficient I am just wondering if 2 will work.... I attached a pic of what I am considering and also of the specs of the linear bearing. I am using 381oz-in steppes to move this axis (the Y axis). Does anyone know if these HIWIN blocks can be mounted in this orientation and if it affects its load bearing capabilities to do so?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Z axis with blocks.jpg‎
Views:	100
Size:	262.3 KB
ID:	98956   Click image for larger version

Name:	block load data.jpg‎
Views:	74
Size:	146.7 KB
ID:	98958  
Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 01:22 PM
YZF YZF is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
YZF is on a distinguished road
Two or four blocks

The blocks can certainly be mounted in this configuration but this setup will be less stiff and be able to take less force/torque in the My (see the block diagram) direction. What force is your stepper going to be applying on the tool when you take into account the ballscrew?
Think about pushing the bottom of your tool in parallel with your Y axis with your nut/ballscrew fixed, this creates a force/torque on the bearings. Having four blocks spaced apart will make a *big* difference (it's the distance between the corners that is important) and that's a fairly standard configuration. You could also do three! If you're not expecting heavy cutting forces you should be able to get away with two depending on the force and the distance to the tool.

By the way, is the surface you're mounting the blocks on flat? It needs to be.

Originally Posted by SatanKlawz View Post
I asked a more technical question about this setup in another thread and now I am looking for more feedback about it. Basically I am kicking around the idea of mounting 2 linear bearings on the back of my z axis since the mounting pattern will fit perfectly. Originally I was going to make a plate that the z axis mounted to and that plate would of mounted to 4 linear bearings. I know that 4 would be more than sufficient I am just wondering if 2 will work.... I attached a pic of what I am considering and also of the specs of the linear bearing. I am using 381oz-in steppes to move this axis (the Y axis). Does anyone know if these HIWIN blocks can be mounted in this orientation and if it affects its load bearing capabilities to do so?
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 01:58 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 161
SatanKlawz is on a distinguished road

If I were to lower the Z axis to where the tip of the cutter was on the table it would be in the very close neighborhood of 4.75" from the center of the lower rail to the end of the cutter. I did read that these HIWIN blocks can be mounted in this configuration just fine. I also read this but do not know where to start to figure the math....
# Use a 4-5 times safety factor for static and moment loading (10 times if you actually will be doing work i.e. gluing, routing, etc. while the load is moving).

# If you use two blocks on one rail you can double the direct load carrying capability and the Mr moment capability of a single block. You can also use a factor of 5 times the Mp and My moment loading capability of a single block.

# The Basic Dynamic Load Rating heading is a figure that says "90% of all identical guideway/bearing combinations will have a life of 50 km (31 miles) of travel at this load."
I am using 1/2-10, 5 start acme screw that has 1/2" of movement per rev. If that matters at all.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 06:24 PM
YZF YZF is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
YZF is on a distinguished road
1st order approximation

The rating of the bearing in My is 35.9kgf m or ~350Nm .

So if you have an arm of 1m you can apply 350N. Since your arm is 4.75" you can apply 1m/4.75" x 350N = 2900N per bearing block and approximately twice that for two closely situated bearing blocks.

My quick back of the envelope (hopefuly correct :-) ) calculation shows that maximum force your motor can put on the tool is 1270N. I don't think the actual cutting is going to be significantly larger.

So you should be fine...

Originally Posted by SatanKlawz View Post
If I were to lower the Z axis to where the tip of the cutter was on the table it would be in the very close neighborhood of 4.75" from the center of the lower rail to the end of the cutter. I did read that these HIWIN blocks can be mounted in this configuration just fine. I also read this but do not know where to start to figure the math....


I am using 1/2-10, 5 start acme screw that has 1/2" of movement per rev. If that matters at all.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 08:52 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 161
SatanKlawz is on a distinguished road

Ok, thanks for the info. I do not plan on doing anything heavy duty with this machine. Just wood and acrylic mainly. I may still do the 4 blocks just for peace of mind it is just going to be a bunch more work and the extra cost of the blocks and material to make it work with 4 blocks. It was just a freak coincidence that I noticed that the Z axis has the same mounting pattern as the bearing blocks that I bought. The blocks in the pic are for another axis so I have to buy more either way. Its just either going to be 2 or 4.

Also is what you figured in line with what was suggested above with a 10x safety factor?

Did I do my own conversion correctly that if you say each block can take 2900N in the My direction with an arm of 4.75". That calculates to near 652 lbs. of force right? And that would be near double with 2 blocks? I do not think I will be putting near that amount of pressure on the cutter.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 01-31-2010, 10:37 PM
YZF YZF is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 94
YZF is on a distinguished road
Safety factor...

Your conversion is right. So allowing for a safety factor of 10 you shouldn't put more than 580N on the tool which should be more than enough for your application. The blocks you're using are decent size and these things are designed to take large loads. There's also a question of the service life you're looking for. The other difference in using 4 blocks is that you'll see higher stiffness, i.e. in the presence of force there will be less deflection, but I don't think that is an issue for your application, we're talking very small deflections.

Originally Posted by SatanKlawz View Post
Ok, thanks for the info. I do not plan on doing anything heavy duty with this machine. Just wood and acrylic mainly. I may still do the 4 blocks just for peace of mind it is just going to be a bunch more work and the extra cost of the blocks and material to make it work with 4 blocks. It was just a freak coincidence that I noticed that the Z axis has the same mounting pattern as the bearing blocks that I bought. The blocks in the pic are for another axis so I have to buy more either way. Its just either going to be 2 or 4.

Also is what you figured in line with what was suggested above with a 10x safety factor?

Did I do my own conversion correctly that if you say each block can take 2900N in the My direction with an arm of 4.75". That calculates to near 652 lbs. of force right? And that would be near double with 2 blocks? I do not think I will be putting near that amount of pressure on the cutter.
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 02-01-2010, 09:46 AM
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 161
SatanKlawz is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the info you guys are some smart cookies. I will go with the 2 for now. If I do detect issues I can always add 2 more with a little work. The math says that I can still put around 130lbs of force on the cutter with a 10x safety factor.

Last edited by SatanKlawz; 02-01-2010 at 02:46 PM.
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help!- Would this work? rich200313 Controller Cards 4 07-16-2008 04:30 AM
Newbie- Work Planes / Work Coordinates MICFDI Esprit 9 05-11-2008 11:35 PM
looking for work joet1324 Employment Opportunity 0 11-10-2006 09:11 AM
Will This Work pzzamakr1980 General Electronics Discussion 1 11-05-2006 08:40 PM
How does a DRO work dberndt General Electronics Discussion 4 12-31-2004 09:24 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361