![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
This is my first post here. I've been reading this forum for a while, until I decided what type and details of my project. Now I'm drawing the plants, and would like to have your thoughts about this topic. Almost all design here uses carriages with 4 skate bearings attached to a v profile, running over a v-profile. Why don't use a v-groove bearing running over a v-profile? Is the cost of the bearings the only reason? What would be the pros and cons of v-groove bearings? thanks in advance |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| The V-groove bearings are far superior imo. Most of the designs you see using Skateboard bearings are older designs. The V Bearings in the past were about $25 each, which made them about 25x more expensive than skate bearings. Only in the last year or two did they become more affordable, now about $12-$13 each. You'll see that a few newer designs are using the V bearings, including Joe's popular 4 x 4 Hybrid.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
miter saw and a cheap drill press.V-groove bearings would make your life a bit easier over skate bearings because you only have to worry about getting the mounting holes in a nice straight line. With skateboard bearings, you need many more, and the bearings need to me mounted accurately on three axises on another piece of angled material vs 2 axises on flat material with the v-groove. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| My opinions are on the fence about this. I do like the simplicity of construction. And definitely tune up is easier, especially if you use eccentric bolts for adjustment. Even though multiple bearings have to be used, there could be a benefit of having the "load" of the bearings distributed, putting less stress on the system. Plus no one can argue the cost While not necessary a problem, I do feel some design considerations should be considered to prevent overloading the bearings. For example if a design incorporates either a tall or heavy gantry, it might be beneficial to widen the bearing distance, or at least keep its weight centered between the bearings. |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| louieatienza, I agree with your thoughts. Also though, if you are using a very heavy gantry, I don't think I'd recommend even using V or skate bearings. Where are you guys buying the bearings? I seem to be seeing ~$8 for one bearing. Surly that can't be right. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| I bought mine here. http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/v-groovewheel2.aspx But I might go with larger ones from VXB for my X and Y axis, but I'll need to fabricate my own eccentrics, or find another source, as VXB doesn't sell them. If you download the Dual V catalog from Bishop Wisecarver, it gives load ratings and how to calculate them for the different sizes of Dual V's. The larger ones have very high load ratings, but can be expensive. As far as fabricating, I think a drill press would be the minimum requirement. By using a fence, it's easy to get the holes in a straight line, and perpendicular to the face.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
amishx64, the great widgetmaster had a build that used v-groove bearings, and though only 24 square by 9 high travvel in the z, the bearings still failed, despite doubling them in the direction of force. Granted it was an all-aluminum construction, but the weight, high z and relatively small bearing spread seemed to lead to their failure. He eventually rebuilt the machine with linear slides. I think however, for the y or z axis, where there is less weight, the v-grooves might perform better, and you get the advantage of the low-profile design i.e. carriage tighter to gantry... edit: Just noticed this thread must have one of the lowest reply to view ratios ever.... |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| However, what I said was, that I want to use larger size bearings from VXB, and they don't have larger size eccentrics available.
It's really quite simple. The bearings have both axial and radial load ratings. Don't exceed the ratings, and they'll work fine. ShopBot's been using them for 15 years. For the Z axis of the router I'm currently designing, I plan on using #3 bearings. The top (load carrying) bearings are rated for almost 700lbs each, and 380lbs axially. And by nit using a bushing, they are mounted with12mm bolts, which are plenty strong.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
| Sponsored Links |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 80/20 Linear Motion Bearings | MoneyB | Linear and Rotary Motion | 3 | 11-08-2007 08:32 PM |
| skate bearings versus linear bearings | paul langwade | Linear and Rotary Motion | 7 | 05-29-2006 10:06 AM |
| Skate Bearings | aggie_67 | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 1 | 03-03-2006 06:38 AM |
| Another use for skate bearings. | fyffe555 | CNCzone Club House | 3 | 10-23-2005 01:41 PM |
| A question on bearings......to skate or not to skate | HiString | DIY-CNC Router Table Machines | 1 | 11-12-2003 01:46 AM |