CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2008, 06:45 PM
Mr.Chips's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,239
Mr.Chips is on a distinguished road
Question Alternative Skirt Design

I have seen a few Skirts in my day but this one is a little different.

It isn't mounted to the router but to the Z Axis fixed base. You would adjust the height for the right interference to the top of the work. And it would remain at the same height all the time. The skirt wouldn't collapse and make gaps as the router moved lower. This would be most useful on flat surface work.

What do you think?

Hager
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Thanks everyone for your comments, I have added them into this original posting.

PROS:
* Not in the way when changing tools.
* A better seal because it maintains the same optimum height no matter how deep you are cutting, which can cause gapping.
* Easy on and off

CONS:

* Material hold down clamps higher than the bristle area would have to be avoided.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Dust Skirt1.jpg‎
Views:	443
Size:	87.2 KB
ID:	50823  

Last edited by Mr.Chips; 01-16-2008 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Added Comments from Members of CNCZone
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 01-15-2008, 07:11 PM
dertsap's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 3,667
dertsap is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

thats a pretty good idea ! i can see benefits to that type of setup , changing the tool being one
__________________
A poet knows no boundary yet he is bound to the boundaries of ones own mind !! http://cnctoybox.org
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-15-2008, 07:15 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 697
wcarrothers1 is on a distinguished road

That is a good idea. Since my gantry Z is setup oposit I don't have anything solid till back up on the Y. But lots a people have their Z like the picture making this possiable. I'd say it could be an improvement long as you don't reqire the skirt to move in order to avoide stuff like clamps around the work or something like that (which could be avoided while riding with the router).

b.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 01-15-2008, 07:29 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,407
martinw is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Mr.Chips View Post
I have seen a few Skirts in my day but this one is a little different.

It isn't mounted to the router but to the Z Axis fixed base. You would adjust the height for the right interference to the top of the work. And it would remain at the same height all the time. The skirt wouldn't collapse and make gaps as the router moved lower. This would be most useful on flat surface work.

What do you think?

Hager
Dear Hager,

I think this is an excellent idea. If you consider how hand-held router dust extraction works, the tool moves into the work-piece through a "collar" that is at a fixed height compared to the top surface of the surface that has to be cut. The collar extracts the dust very well.

However, if you want to do "stuff" that makes the top surface of the work-piece somewhat less than flat, we have problems.

My guess is that you are correct. It will usually be the case that the wonky surface of the work-piece will always be better sealed, as regards dust, by a fixed shroud rather than a mobile one on the Z axis. After all, the Z axis will always be moving vertically greater distances than the profiles of the workpiece , and that suggests that a shroud that is not driven from the Z axis will work better.

Just a thought, errh, probably badly expressed...

Best wishes,
Martin
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-15-2008, 07:41 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,407
martinw is on a distinguished road

Sorry, quick correction..

By "fixed", I mean a shroud that could be adjusted vertically for each job, as originally suggested.

Thanks for your patience,

Best wishes,
Martin
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 01-15-2008, 07:42 PM
dertsap's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: canada
Posts: 3,667
dertsap is on a distinguished road
Buy me a Beer?

the more i think about it , i like the idea of having something like that because it can be setup to pop it on pop it off which is simple and i like to keep things simple and convenient .
when i'm cutting wood and especially mdf it would be nice to have the dust extraction but i haven t added one because it would be in the way when im cutting aluminum , something like that is perfect
__________________
A poet knows no boundary yet he is bound to the boundaries of ones own mind !! http://cnctoybox.org
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-15-2008, 07:52 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,407
martinw is on a distinguished road

Somebody on the Zone came up with the idea of fixing dust shrouds with magnets.

Easy to fix, and easy to remove. Brilliant. Do a search.

Best wishes,
Martin
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 01-16-2008, 10:25 AM
Mr.Chips's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,239
Mr.Chips is on a distinguished road

Thanks everyone for your comments, I have added them into the original posting above.

PROS:
* Not in the way when changing tools.
* A better seal because it maintains the same optimum height no matter how deep you are cutting, which can cause gapping.
* Easy on and off

CONS:
* Material hold down clamps higher than the bristle area would have to be avoided.
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 01-17-2008, 12:20 AM
Mr.Chips's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,239
Mr.Chips is on a distinguished road
Question Upholstery Brush as Skirt

I went to the dollar store today looking for a broom, brush, or what ever to use the bristles, and I thought about a vacuum cleaner upholstery brush. See photo below.

Simply cut off the top portion and glue it into a box. The circular brush would surround the bit and focus the suction. Drawing below, but not to scale.

I know most of the Dust Skirts I have seen have had the Skirt part as large as the shoe, but is this necessary?

Any comments on this type Dust Shoe/Skirt?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UpholstryBrush.jpg‎
Views:	89
Size:	4.5 KB
ID:	50885   Click image for larger version

Name:	UpholstryBrush2.jpg‎
Views:	139
Size:	24.6 KB
ID:	50886  
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 01-17-2008, 04:43 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 740
BobF is on a distinguished road

I bought a router mount bracket from K2. It has a 1/2" hole drilled vertically through a corner of the bracket. The purpose is to mount the dust shield. The shield is attached to a 1/2" rod that slips up through the hole and there is a set screw to hold it in place. This is easy to remove and easy to set the height of the shield. You may want to adapt that idea.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11  
Old 01-18-2008, 12:09 AM
Mr.Chips's Avatar
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: USA Tucson AZ
Posts: 1,239
Mr.Chips is on a distinguished road
Question DOES SIZE MATTER?

Let me rephrase the question.

How well do you think a 2" diameter Dust Skirt would work?

Has anyone tried one this small?

Thanks
Hager
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	UpholstryBrush.jpg‎
Views:	72
Size:	4.5 KB
ID:	50986   Click image for larger version

Name:	UpholstryBrush2.jpg‎
Views:	70
Size:	24.6 KB
ID:	50987  
Reply With Quote

  #12   Ban this user!
Old 01-18-2008, 05:59 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 454
Buzz9075 is on a distinguished road

One thing to keep in mind if you are using a smaller dust collect it is not like a vacuum. This is what I have been told by the local store where I got my dust collector, if you reduce the size of the vacuum hose you reduce the suction capability, so what I have been doing with all my designs is ensure at no point does the cross section of the air path go below the size of the cross section of my 4" vacuum hose. So when you design your head if you using a dust colletor you want to try and keep the paths moving the through your head design equal or very close to the size of the vacuum hose it self. For example area of a 4" hose is 12.56 sq" or a path 6 * 2.1" or 12.56" * 1". If you are using a shop vac this is not the same.

It is rather easy to prove, take a piece of card board and cut a 2" diameter hole in it and place it over the end of you dust collection hose. If it acts like a vacuum you will get more suction through this hole than you do through the 4" hose itself.
I have never tried one at 2" all mine are much larger. As your hole is not permitting the router to go through the vacuum head make sure you test with shorter cutters to ensure they will make it deep enough, for example my 1/16" cutter are much shorter than the rest of my cutters.

Buzz
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finding Engineering Design Software For Automatic Machine Design hellokitty General CAM Discussion 0 01-06-2008 12:39 AM
Alternative Material Jim Mill General Metalwork Discussion 5 12-30-2006 02:08 PM
PIC Alternative Lston General Electronics Discussion 3 07-10-2006 02:35 PM
bridgeport quil skirt tmule Bridgeport and Hardinge Mills 4 03-03-2006 04:04 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361