CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 09-18-2007, 02:54 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
flash319 is on a distinguished road
Belt Tension Options??

I am doing a 4X8 router table with some belts for power transmission. I have been looking at different ways to hold tension. One is just to pull one pully away from the other. I think this would work when the distance is not to great but what about when the distance is 8 feet? Should I use a roller under and over the pullies to hold tension? Here is my Y axis. I am thinking with this that pulling one away from the other will work here. The issue will be when I mount this on the rails and the whole assy moves 8 feet. What are some solutions for tension on a long belt?



Reply With Quote

  #2   Ban this user!
Old 09-19-2007, 08:57 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 697
wcarrothers1 is on a distinguished road

I don't see any major issues with it other then the gear ratios. I'm not a huge fan of my ball screw drive on Y since it's slow (high limit to maybe 200ipm) .. If I really wanted to go faster I'd look into a belt.

But I'd be thinking of smaller pullies on the ends. Guessing you are tensioning them by pulling one of them away from the other? I'd rather try that then having an idle pulley how ever the having a little idler pullie on the slack side might be nice just to control any belt flap or vibration on that long section. Also figure on having some sort of screw setup to pull on your bearing blocks to put tension on the belt as you are pulling them apart.. Don't think you will get the tension on that belt that you will want to have with out some sort of tension knob type thing before tightening the blocks down.

You going with stepers or what here? (thinking about the ratio.) as you might also be looking at needing a planetary trans or something to gear it down. On my X I have it geared with a 10:1 planetary to 18t/24t belt to 1" round rack pinion. So in this case if you were to have 1" round belt pulley's on the main belt you would still need to gear it down more before the drive motor (least in my little world.) I would not mind gearing mine down even more then it is how ever I can get 600ipm to 800ipm on that axis as it is so it's about perfect the way I got mine..

HOpeufully some good suggestions.

b.
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 09-19-2007, 11:20 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
flash319 is on a distinguished road

I am using servo motors. The small one is around 300Watts and the large is 750. I am going to go with a belt system to the Z axis ball screw. The large motor is for the Y travel as you can see. I am going to gear it down as much as possible (5:1) with pullies off the motor to the belt system. the reason I have the large pullies on the belt system is that I am thinking more tooth engagement with the belt. Is there a down side to doin this? Why would I want smaller pullies?

You can see from the picture that I am missing a linear rail running inside the belt. This is the other reason that the pullies are big so that I can clear the rail.
Reply With Quote

  #4   Ban this user!
Old 09-19-2007, 12:31 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 697
wcarrothers1 is on a distinguished road

Just was thinking smaller pullies on either side as the bigger they get the more you are increasing your gear ratio and the slower your servo will move per movement of the gantry. Servos like more rotation per move far as I know. Thus smaller pullies on either side would gear you down even more. Tooth engagement is something you will have to consider how ever I don't think they have to be 2" or bigger round pullies to have enought teeth in to do the job but that is just in my head.
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 09-19-2007, 01:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 93
flash319 is on a distinguished road

I see what you mean now. 1 turn equals more distance traveled because diameter is larger. Sometimes I do not think about everthing! I will keep them as small as possible, just enough to clear my rail and truck. Thanks.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6   Ban this user!
Old 09-19-2007, 02:06 PM
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 697
wcarrothers1 is on a distinguished road

Actually I'd have the loop either above or below the truck if I were you. Around the truck means dissassembly if you needed to put a new belt on. Unless you are using a split belt with a holder in the middle or something I guess..

if it's a solid loop best to make it able to be removed and replaced with the least amount of rebuilding or taking apart of other things... Also depending on how much force you are going to want to apply you are perhaps going to want to see a 10:1 reduction on the belt drive shaft if you used a small 1" pulley. But again I'm just juggleing eyeball numbers in my head and based on how I'm driving my Z...

b./
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timing belt tension requirements vs backlash jensor Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 1 05-20-2007 02:04 PM
Torch tension input for a PIC [ THC ] MaXx General Electronics Discussion 4 05-13-2007 07:23 PM
Tension/compression tap holders Caprirs General Metalwork Discussion 8 04-05-2007 07:59 AM
Wire tension gguidi CNC Wire Foam Cutter Machines 1 10-20-2006 09:40 AM
Belt Tension Adjuster Design mxtras Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design 8 05-16-2005 10:33 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361