![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I have 80 oz. motors on my router that will run the machine but can be stalled and prone to lose a few steps. They are 6v 1.2a Vextas and I am running them on 24 volts. I'm using a John K. Piker 4x Unipolar board to drive them. If I was to run them in Bipolar mode using a Xylotex board or Gheko drives would I get more torque? Would I still keep the same speed? Would I be better off increasing the voltage to 36v and run them Unipolar? Or should I buy motors with a higher torque? Chris |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Torque is made by Amps, and Speed needs Volts. Do you loose steps at very low RPM or at medium RPM? If at low RPM, only increasing the current will help. With a piker torque drops rather quickly at higher RPM's so if you are loosing steps during rapids or fast cuts, increasing the voltage would help a little bit. Changing to Xylotex or Gecko helps a lot. John |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I would agree with limbo, your best bet would be going to bipolar drives. Increasing the voltage will not help with low speed torque. I would go with the Xylotex due to the cost and the demand of your motors, the Geckos would be overkill. Now if you intend to replace the motors in the long term, it might be worth the added expence of the Gecko drives. Bill |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| The geckos will work great for any size motors up to 7a and 80V. they would only be overkill in the cost department. The Xylotex should deliver similar performance up to 2.5a and 24V, but the Geckos have the edge over the Xylotex because of the Xylotex's low voltage limit. They'll both give you the same low speed torque, but with a higher voltage power supply, the geckos will let you run at higher speeds. But, for motors under 150-200 oz-in, the performance increase from Geckos vs. Xylotex probably isn't worth the price. Save the Geckos (and the money) for bigger motors. If you do get a Xylotex, you'll still be limited in top speed by the 6V rating. So if you want to go faster, you really should upgrade both your motors and drivers.... I just looked at your machine thread. If you're going to keep that machine for a while and want better performance for low cost, get a Xylotex and try to find some 180-200oz-in motors.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Let me see if I can put the concensus together. Bipolar and Xylotex will get me the most results right now. Maybe increase my power supply to 30v (Max for Xylotex) Stronger motors in the longer run. Save the Ghekos for a more sophisticated machine and larger motors. That works for me, as a large cash outlay isn't justified for this machine. Thanks, Chris |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
I've seen people with homemade routers, using Xylotex, 1/2-10 acme, and these: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...808786316&rd=1 get about 30-40 ipm. ymmv
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| I can do 30 ipm. That is the max I have TCNC set at. When I am cutting I slow it down to 15 or 20. I seem to lose a few steps at that speed but there may be other issues involved. Namely RFI. The problem is that it is easy to stall the axes. That tells me that the steppers are underpowered (my interpretation). Chris |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| If you aren't losing steps on rapids at 30 ipm, then as you discribe it seems the low end torque is lacking. I would switch to a bipolar setup; not sure but you should gain 10-30 oz/in holding over unipolar. Then even if you still have a problem, going to a 120oz/in motor won't add too much more to the bill. Bill |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I think what I am going to do first is purchase a Xylotex board and build a 30v ~8a power supply. Also finish my shielded wiring. Maybe with those things I will see an improvement. One of the things I have found out is that the Porter Cable Trim router is noisy in RFI. That may be contributing to my lost steps. I think it is in part because of the two wire power cord with no ground. Maybe I will try a 3 wire cord and ground the frame. Right now the case is grounded but through the machine framework. Thanks for all of your advice, Chris |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#11
| ||||
| ||||
| Just a word of warning, the Xylotex is sometimes notoriously susceptible to noise problems.
__________________ Gerry Mach3 2010 Screenset http://home.comcast.net/~cncwoodworker/2010.html (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management) |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| A 6v motor at 24v!! can they handle that? I have some 6v motors and run them at 11.5v and they get very hot so I'm afraid they will burn out. Are they designed to handle that much overvoltage? Mine are 6v, 56oz-in. Japan Servo Company motors KP56LM2-097 thanks |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stepper Motor High Torque Low Amp | Sanghera | Stepper Motors and Drives | 13 | 03-21-2005 07:16 PM |
| Low torque | swarfmacdaddy | Stepper Motors and Drives | 9 | 12-29-2004 02:47 PM |
| singing motors, no torque | swarfmacdaddy | Stepper Motors and Drives | 2 | 12-13-2004 07:06 AM |
| Stepper question: torque re: current | cnczane | Stepper Motors and Drives | 14 | 10-21-2004 09:30 PM |
| dc servo motor torque | SJ781 | Servo Motors and Drives | 19 | 06-08-2004 04:38 AM |