CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net!



Home Page Mark Forums Read Today's Posts My Replies Classifieds Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Share Files Advertise With Us Ad List
Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Largest Machinist Community on the net! > WoodWorking Machines > DIY-CNC Router Table Machines


DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here!


This forum is sponsored by:

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2007, 03:00 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 426
yukonho is on a distinguished road
What guage and size steel to use?

Hi guys, it has been a while since I posted, but I sold the old machine and am about to embark on a steel machine.
This machine will have a 4 foot gantry (x) and 3 foot Y. It will be driven by leadscrews on each side by 280 oz in steppers driven on 68 volts through geckos.
I am thinking that 2" X 4" tube will do the trick for the gantry, but what guage do I use? Or perhaps should I go to a larger size? I am not familiar with the standard sizes.
Any suggestions?
Also looking for suggestions for the endplates for the gantry that will go down to the linear slides beneath the table.
No drawings yet, you get to help design this one with me!
Thanks
Colin
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 01-16-2007, 04:02 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

2X4X.125" is easy to get, relatively easy to cut and weld and it's dimensions make it a convenient choice. 1/8" wall may not be substantial enough to hold a thread larger than #10, though. I have tapped 1/4-20 into 1/8" wall for holding a pneumatic regulator, etc and it is fine for that kind of application, but it may be too thin for attaching something like a motor mount or a linear bearing.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #3   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2007, 04:25 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 426
yukonho is on a distinguished road

Thanks for that. Will that be stout enough for my 4+ foot wide gantry? My Z axis will be fairly light, but I will be using an 11 amp router (heavier than the roto zips or trim routers)
I would plan on using nuts and access holes to bolt anything on. I plan on welding the gantry endplates on.
Colin
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 01-16-2007, 05:18 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

What are you planning on cutting?

2x4x.125 is going to deflect if you load it heavily (anything deflects - it's a matter of how much your process can tolerate). It also depends on how the tubing will be applied - if there are large cantilevered forces, the tubing might not be stout enough to span 4' and perform as you might want and you might look at making some alterations to the design, or include additional members to stiffen the beam - too many variables to say right now.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #5   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2007, 07:09 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 426
yukonho is on a distinguished road

Cuts will be MDF and plywood with 1/2" bit at the most. I want a very rigid machine, and I expect to use feeds around 60 ipm with rapids in the mid 200's. Gantry will be supported and driven at each end, thus the worst possible place for deflection will be in the middle of the gantry.
What is the next larger size rectangular tubing?
Colin
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #6  
Old 01-16-2007, 11:28 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Going with larger tubing may not be the answer. Larger tubing is going be heavier and you will have to accelerate the added mass.

You might want to investigate making a stiff structure for your gantry - maybe even using smaller tubing, but using more than just one beam. Something like three arranged in a triangular manner, tied together with spars could be made lightweight and stiff. I don't know if this makes sense... There are lots of ways to get a stiff structure without adding a lot of mass.

Tubing is available in pretty much every inch dimension - 2X2, 2X3, 3X3, 3X4, 4X4, 4X6, 2X6 etc. Common wall thicknesses are 1/8", 1/4", 3/16" and many sizes of tubing are available with gauge thickness walls - check google for 'steel tubing' and you will find online suppliers and their stock lists, and quite possibly pricing, but you will likely get a better price from a local supplier.

Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #7   Ban this user!
Old 01-16-2007, 11:57 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 426
yukonho is on a distinguished road

Thanks for the info.
Being driven by two steppers, I am less worried about the added mass, however I do agree that overkill in mass is not the way to go. I am not keen on using more than one tube for the gantry, too many alignment issues and less simple to build.
I will simply have to get my hands on some steel and make the decision then on size.
Again, thank you for your help.
Colin
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #8   Ban this user!
Old 01-17-2007, 12:02 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,419
Geof will become famous soon enough

To give you some idea about weights 4" x 6" x 1/4" wall tube is around 17lbs per foot. My gues is that this would be plenty stiff enough, probably more than stiff enough so you could maybe go down to 3/16 wall which is around 13lbs per foot for a total weight of just over 50lbs just for the tube.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 01-17-2007, 09:13 AM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Ok. Here are some available sizes and weights per foot of tubing. I also included a quick review of the calculated deflection of each using 500 pound load in the center of the tube with the ends simply supported. I used the tubing in the most favorable condition for the deflection calculation.

4X2 tubing:
.120 wall = 4.7 lbs per foot .027" deflection
.135 wall = 5.2 lbs per foot .025" deflection
.148 wall = 5.7 lbs per foot .023" deflection
.188 wall = 6.9 lbs per foot .018" deflection
.250 wall = 8.8 lbs per foot .015" deflection

4X6 tubing:
.188 wall = 12.0 lbs per foot .0043" deflection
.250 wall = 15.6 lbs per foot .0034" deflection
.313 wall = 19.0 lbs per foot .0028" deflection
.375 wall = 22.3 lbs per foot .0024" deflection


Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.

Last edited by mxtras; 01-17-2007 at 03:17 PM. Reason: I removed a statement that could add confusion about the calcs
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #10   Ban this user!
Old 01-17-2007, 10:17 AM
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 323
jcc3inc is on a distinguished road

Mxtras,

Thanks for the good listing of deflection vs load! It's good to see some technical info here instead of "I think that will be OK" approach.

The original poster can see that his deflection for a 50# load using the 2 x 4 x .120 wall will be .0027 inches!! He will have a heck of a lot more deflection/lost motion in the rest of his machine.

The engineering approach is very welcome.

Regards,
Jack C.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #11   Ban this user!
Old 01-17-2007, 10:26 AM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,419
Geof will become famous soon enough

Originally Posted by jcc3inc View Post
....The engineering approach is very welcome.

Regards,
Jack C.
Yes but the old fogies guess was pretty close.

mxtras how about a torsional load of about 100 lb ft applied at the center, the cutter forces do not act directly on the tube. I guess this will prove to be okay also.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 01-17-2007, 03:15 PM
mxtras's Avatar
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Age: 45
Posts: 1,810
mxtras is on a distinguished road

Originally Posted by Geof View Post
Yes but the old fogies guess was pretty close.

mxtras how about a torsional load of about 100 lb ft applied at the center, the cutter forces do not act directly on the tube. I guess this will prove to be okay also.
At about what distance would the forces be acting? Are you asking for 100 pounds of torsion about the center of the tube? I would guess that the torsional forces would be produced by the cutting forces at the tool which might be a few inches from the center of the tube.

With a 4"X2"X.120 tube standing vertically (4" in the Z axis) and a 100 pound force acting about 4" from the center of this simply supported tube, it would deflect about .0002". If the tube was layed on it's side and the same conditions apply, it would deflect about .0006". A 4"X4"X.120" tube would deflect .0001" - theoretically, of course.

So Geoff's guess is proven to be OK, I guess. It's luck, I am sure....



Scott
__________________
Consistency is a good thing....unless you're consistently an idiot.
Tweet this Post!Share on Facebook
Reply With Quote

Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Template-Modifications by TMS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353