![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
I have an assortment of questions regarding fixed lead screw and rotating lead nut configurations. Everyone seems to use timing belts on lead screws. My local Harbor Freight type store (Princess Auto here in Canada) has an excellent selection of small sprockets and chain. Is there an advantage to timing belts and cogged pulleys? I think I could adjust the backlash out of a chain system. How much side load can I put on a stepper output shaft? I'd guess most steppers use bushings so they may not stand up well to significant side loading. Do I need to plan for a side load support on the motor side, in the event I go with a rotating nut system? Does anyone have pictures of a DIY implementation of a rotating nut system? I really like the idea of direct drive lead screws. I'm just kicking this around. It would really be a sweet idea if someone made a hollow shaft stepper that could act as both stepper and nut both. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Just did a simple sketch as a worst case scenario. Imagine a 4-tooth chain sprocket, not realistic, but is calculates easier. The line of the chain is horizontal. The sprocket is in the "X" position. The chain is now lifted during 45 degrees, if you move the chain. This means that true anti-backlash is not possible with a chain. A timing belt has chords, outside the pulley, that are driving. The tooth are actually just anti slip. So a timing belt gives true rotation transfer, a chain not. A stepper is a motor, it should be designed to transfer at least it's output. Last edited by fkaCarel; 09-17-2006 at 02:47 PM. Reason: added "move the chain" |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| It's the same as the rear drive axle from gearbox to differential (Hooke = Cardan?), double the system and offset the sets halftooth. Invent wearfree chain and put new batteries in your calculator, where you could have used a timing belt in the first place. This is just one the uses of geometry, where you see error introduction. In practice, you may never see it, or on the other side, you may never find it, if it bites you. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| What about something like this, i guess it wouldn be that hard to fabricate. 2 bearings 30mm inner diameter, a deldrin or aluminium rod, bored and taped to fit the leadscrew, and a standard pully turned to fit the rod |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I agree on the double bearing, the picture in post #4 leans on the shaft. I disagree on delrin for a bearing fit or aluminium for a nut. Bronze would be a better suited material. And the design should be expandable for anti-backlash. The difficult part in designing rotating nuts is, that there is almost the need to design space for spare belts, to avoid large scale disassembly. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Bronze then, as long as its soft enough to tap:-) My guess is that with a normal router for hobby usage the belt will last "forever", anyway you have to remove it from the rod to change belt so a few screws should'nt make a different. Maybe this inclosure would work |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
Courtesy of Google: simple universal joint, known in English-speaking countries as Hooke's joint and in continental Europe as a Cardan joint, So when you communicate in English you have to use Hooke but any other language you can use Cardan. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |