![]() | |
| Home Page | Mark Forums Read | Today's Posts | My Replies | Classifieds | Reviews | Photo Gallery | Web Links | Share Files | Advertise With Us | Ad List |
| |||||||
| DIY-CNC Router Table Machines Discuss the building of home-made CNC Router tables here! |
| This forum is sponsored by: |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Mill, no... router, yes. That's assuming that you'd be properly mounting your linear rails on the bar, which would effectively increase the material depth and decrease extreme fiber loads and deflection. The 1/2 by 3 loaded on the 3" axis should be more than enough for any sensible router work, I'd think. Add the rail thickness and your deflections the other direction should be minimal as well. Tiger |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
Tiger, While I agree that the aluminum will suffice for a router, the rails will provide almost no structural support for the frame. Despite the fact that they are steel, they have a very small cross section. Rails are for motion, not for structural support! Carlo |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Hmmm. Seems to me that rails are by definition structural support members. They are, after all, rated largely by their load carrying capacity. Had a quick refresher look around, and the lightest duty units I could find were the techno model 1 rails which would add just under an inch (24.5 mm) of aluminum to that 1/2 plate. THK's smallest I found offhand was a 5mm thick stainless steel rail which would not be an inconsequential addition when figuring beam moments for lateral loads on that plate. Any way I look at it, the rails add to the total. Tiger |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |